Skip to main content
Log in

Efficiency comparison of an augmented finite element formulation with standard return mapping algorithms for elastic-inelastic materials

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The numerical simulation of elastic-inelastic material behaviour is reviewed and an alternative method, i. e., an augmented Finite Element (FE) formulation is presented. For the augmented FE formulation, the history variables, which provide the information of inelastic deformations from previous time-steps, are represented as FE functions. The discretisation of the augmented system results in additional degrees of freedom (DOF). As a result, generally accepted standard formulations for evaluating inelastic deformations in a numeric sub-step can now be replaced by a fully coupled Newton method. Then, it is not required to solve additional local systems. Both numerical methods are exemplarily applied to a viscoplastic Perzyna-type regularisation of softening material behaviour within a geometrically linear approach in order to simulate the development of shear bands occurring in a tensile bar. Numerical studies prove comparative results, while exhibiting a computational speed-up for the augmented FE formulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ammann M (2005) Parallel finite element simulations of localization phenomena in porous media. Dissertation, Report No. II-11 of the Institute of Applied Mechanics (CE), University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart

  2. Becker M, Miehe C (2005) Incompatibility induced nonlocal crystal plasticity. Proc Appl Math Mech (PAMM) 5: 259–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ehlers W (1995–2010) Vector and tensor calculus: an introduction. Lecture notes, Institute of Applied Mechanics (CE), University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart. http://www.mechbau.de

  4. Ehlers W (2002) Foundations of multiphasic and porous materials. In: Ehlers W, Bluhm J (eds) Porous Media: Theory, Experiments and Numerical Applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–86

    Google Scholar 

  5. Engelen RAB, Geers MGD, Baaijens FPT (2003) Nonlocal implicit gradient-enhanced elasto-plasticity for the modelling of softening behaviour. Int J Plast 19: 403–433

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Herres OM, Suiker ASJ, de Borst R (2002) A comparison between the Perzyna viscoplastic model and the Consistency viscoplastic model. Eur J Mech A, Solids 21: 1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Krabbenhoft K, Lyamin AV, Sloan SW, Wriggers P (2007) An interior-point algorithm for elastoplasticity. Int J Num Meth Eng 69: 592–626

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Kulkarni DV, Tortorelli DA, Wallin M (2007) A Newton-Schur alternative to the consistent tangent approach in computational plasticity. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 196: 1169–1177

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Liebe T, Steinmann P (2001) Theory and numerics of a thermodynamically consistent framework for geometrically linear gradient plasticity. Int J Num Meth Eng 51: 1437–1467

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Lourenço PB, de Borst R, Rots JG (1997) A plane stress softening plasticity model for orthotropic materials. Int J Num Meth Eng 40: 4033–4057

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Perzyna P (1966) Fundamental problems in viscoplasticity. Adv Appl Mech 9: 243–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Simo J, Hughes TJR (1998) Computational Inelasticity. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Simo JC, Taylor RL (1985) Consistent tangent operators for rate-independent elastoplasticity. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 48: 101–118

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Simo JC, Kennedy JG, Govindjee S (1988) Non-smooth multisurface plasticity and viscoplasticity. Loading/unloading conditions numerical algorithms. Int J Num Meth Eng 26: 2161–2185

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Wieners C (2007) Nonlinear solution methods for infinitesimal perfect plasticity. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik (ZAMM) 87: 636–660

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Ehlers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rempler, HU., Wieners, C. & Ehlers, W. Efficiency comparison of an augmented finite element formulation with standard return mapping algorithms for elastic-inelastic materials. Comput Mech 48, 551–562 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-011-0602-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-011-0602-9

Keywords

Navigation