Skip to main content
Log in

Imposition of time-dependent boundary conditions in FEM formulations for elastodynamics: critical assessment of penalty-type methods

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the variationally consistent incorporation of time dependent boundary conditions. The proposed methodology avoids ad hoc procedures and is applicable to both linear as well as nonlinear problems. An integral formulation of the dynamic problem serves as a basis for the imposition of the corresponding constraints, which are enforced via the consistent form of the penalty method, e.g. a form that complies with the norm and inner product of the functional space where the weak formulation is posed. Also, it is shown that well known and broadly implemented modelling techniques such as “large mass” and “large spring” methods, arise as limiting cases of the penalty formulation. Further extension of the proposed methodology is provided in the case where a generalized weak formulation of the dynamic problem with an independent velocity field is assumed. Finally, a few examples serve to illustrate the above concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnold VI (1988) Mathematical methods of classical mechanics. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stakgold I (1998) Green’s functions and boundary value problem. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mindlin RD, Goodman LE (1950) Beam vibrations with time-dependent boundary conditions. ASME J Appl Mech 17: 377–380

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Babuška I (1973) The finite element method with penalty. Math Comput 27: 221–228

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cook RD, Malkus DS, Plesha ME (1989) Concepts and applications of finite element analysis. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Leger P, Idet IM, Paultre P (1990) Multiple-support seismic analysis of large structures. Comput Struct 36: 1153–1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Babuška I (1973) The finite element method with Lagrangian multipliers. Numer Math 20: 179–192

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Brezis H (1983) Analyse Functionelle, Thèorie et Applications. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rektorys K (1977) Variational methods in mathematics, science and engineering. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ženišek A (1990) Nonlinear elliptic and evolution problems and their finite element. Approximations Academic Press, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Courant R, Hilbert D (1989) Methods of mathematical physics, vol 2. Wiley-VCH, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hughes TJR, Hulbert GM (1988) Space-time finite element methods for elastodynamics: formulations and error estimates. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 66: 339–363

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Pitarresi JM, Manolis GD (1991) The temporal finite element method in structural dynamics. Comput Struct 41: 647–655

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Idesman AV (2007) Solution of linear elastodynamic problems with space-time finite elements on structured and unstructured meshes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196: 1787–1815

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Bathe KJ (1995) Finite element procedures. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brenan K, Campbell S, Petzold L (1989) Numerical solution of initial-value problems in differential-algebraic equations. North-Holland, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Geradin M, Cardona A (2001) Flexible multibody dynamics: a finite element approach. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Belytschko T, Liu WK, Moran B (2001) Nonlinear finite elements for continua and structures. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lanczos C (1974) The variational principles of mechanics, 4th edn. University of Toronto Press

  20. Pars LA (1965) A treatise on analytical dynamics. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Hughes TJR (1976) Reduction scheme for some structural eigenvalue problems by a variational theorem. Int J Numer Methods Eng 10: 845–852

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Paraskevopoulos EA, Talaslides DG (2004) A rational approach to mass matrix diagonalization in two dimensional elastodynamics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 61: 2639–2659

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Paraskevopoulos EA, Panagiotopoulos CG, Talaslides DG (2008) Rational derivation of conserving time integration schemes: the moving mass case. In: Papadrakakis M, Charmpis DC, Lagaros ND, Tsompanakis Y (eds) Progress in computational dynamics and earthquake engineering. Taylor and Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  24. Panagiotopoulos CG, Manolis GD (2009) Velocity-based reciprocal theorems in elastodynamics and BIEM implementation issues. Archives of Applied Mechanics, accepted, to appear in 2009

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George D. Manolis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paraskevopoulos, E.A., Panagiotopoulos, C.G. & Manolis, G.D. Imposition of time-dependent boundary conditions in FEM formulations for elastodynamics: critical assessment of penalty-type methods. Comput Mech 45, 157–166 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-009-0428-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-009-0428-x

Keywords

Navigation