Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Optimization method for the determination of the most unfavorable imperfection of structures

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents an optimization method for direct determination of the most unfavorable imperfection of structures by means of ultimate limit states. When analyzing imperfection sensitive structures it turns out that the choice of the shape and size of initial imperfections has a major influence on the response of the structure and its ultimate state. Within the optimization algorithm the objective function is constructed by means of a fully nonlinear direct and first order sensitivity analysis. The method is not limited to small imperfections and also allows the imposition of “technological” constraints on the shape of the imperfection, thus making it possible to avoid unrealistically low ultimate loads. When carefully constructed, the objective function and constraints remain linear enabling the use of numerically efficient and readily available linear programming algorithms. Imperfection analyses are shown for thin-walled girders and a cylinder to demonstrate the applicability and efficiency of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bažant ZP, Cedolin L (2003) Stability of structures: elastic, inelastic, fracture, and damage theories. Dover Publications, Mineola

    Google Scholar 

  2. CEN (2004) Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures, Part 1.5: Plated structural elements. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

  3. CEN (2006) Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures, Part 1.6: Strength and stability of Shell Structures. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

  4. Crisfield MA (1996) Non-linear finite element analysis of solids and structures. New Ed edition. Wiley, New York, pp 362

  5. Crisfield MA (1997) Non-linear finite element analysis of solids and structures, vol 2, Advanced Topics. Wiley, New York, p 508

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deml M, Wunderlich W (1997) Direct evaluation of the ‘worst’ imperfection shape in shell buckling. Comput Method Appl M 149: 201–222

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dinkler D, Pontow J (2006) A model to evaluate dynamic stability of imperfection sensitive shells. Comput Mech 37: 523–529

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. El Damatty AA, Nassef AO (2001) A finite element optimization technique to determine critical imperfections of shell structures. Struct Multidiscip O 23: 75–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Elishakoff I (2000) Uncertain buckling: its past, present and future. Int J Solids Struct 37: 6869–6889

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Ewert E, Schweizerhof K, Vielsack P (2006) Measures to judge the sensitivity of thin-walled shells concerning stability under different loading conditions. Comput Mech 37: 507–522

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Godoy LA (2000) Theory of elastic stability: analysis and sensitivity. Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ho D (1974) Buckling load of non-linear systems with multiple eigenvalues. Int J Non-Linear Mech 6: 649–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Johansson B, Maquoi R, Sedlacek G, Müller C, Beg D (2005) Commentary to EN 1993-1-5 “Plated structural elements”. Luleå University of Technology

  14. Koiter WT (1945) Over de stabiliteit van het elastisch even- wicht. Techische Hooge School, Delft. English translation : Edward Riks (1969), The stability of elastic equilibrium. Stanford University

  15. Korelc J (2002) Multi-language and multi-environment generation of nonlinear finite element codes. Eng Comput-Germany 18: 312–327

    Google Scholar 

  16. Korelc J (2007) AceFEM, Mathematica finite element environment. University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering. http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/Symech/

  17. Korelc J (2007) AceGEN, Multi-Language, Multi-Environment numerical code generation. University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering. http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/Symech/

  18. Korelc J, Kristanič N (2005) Evaluation of design velocity field by direct differentiation of symbolically parameterized mesh. In: Onate E(eds) Plasticity: fundamentals and applications: proceedings of the eighth international conference on computational plasticity Swansea: CIMNE. Spain, Barcelona, pp 380–383

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lanzo AD, Garcea G (1996) Koiter’s analysis of thin-walled structures by a finite element approach. Int J Numer Meth Eng 39: 3007–3031

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Lanzo AD (2000) A Koiter’s perturbation strategy for the imperfection sensitivity analysis of thin-walled structures with residual stresses. Thin Wall Struct 37: 77–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Michaleris P, Tortorelli DA, Vidal CA (1994) Tangent operators and design sensitivity formulations for transient nonlinear coupled problems with applications to elastoplasticity. Int J Numer Meth Eng 37: 2471–2499

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Papadopoulos V, Papadrakakis M (2005) The effect of material and thickness variability on the buckling load of shells with random initial imperfections. Comput Method Appl M 194: 1405–1426

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Schenk CA, Schueller GI (2003) Buckling analysis of cylindrical shells with random geometric imperfections. Int J Non-Linear Mech 38: 1119–1132

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Schmidt H (2000) Stability of steel shell structures—general report. J Constr Steel Res 55: 159–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schneider W (2006) Stimulating equivalent geometric imperfections for the numerical buckling strength verification of axially compressed cylindrical steel shells. Comput Mech 37: 530–536

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Schneider W, Brede A (2005) Consistent equivalent geometric imperfections for the numerical buckling strength verification of cylindrical shells under uniform external pressure. Thin Wall Struct 43: 175–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schneider W, Tirnmel I, Hohn K (2005) The conception of quasi-collapse-affine imperfections: a new approach to unfavourable imperfections of thin-walled shell structures. Thin Wall Struct 43: 1202–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Song CY, Teng JG, Rotter JM (2004) Imperfection sensitivity of thin elastic cylindrical shells subject to partial axial compression. Int J Solids Struct 41: 7155–7180

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Wisniewski K, Turska E (2000) Kinematics of finite rotation shells with in-plane twist parameter. Comput Method Appl M 190: 1117–1135

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Wisniewski K, Turska E (2001) Warping and in-plane twist parameters in kinematics of finite rotation shells. Comput Method Appl M 190: 5739–5758

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Wriggers P, Simo JC (1990) A general procedure for the direct computation of turning and bifurcation points. Int J Numer Meth Eng 30: 155–176

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Wunderlich W, Albertin U (2000) Analysis and load carrying behaviour of imperfection sensitive shells. Int J Numer Meth Eng 47: 255–273

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Wunderlich W, Albertin U (2002) Buckling behaviour of imperfect spherical shells. Int J Non-Linear Mech 37: 589–604

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Jamova 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Niko Kristanič & Jože Korelc

Authors
  1. Niko Kristanič
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jože Korelc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jože Korelc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kristanič, N., Korelc, J. Optimization method for the determination of the most unfavorable imperfection of structures. Comput Mech 42, 859–872 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-008-0288-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-008-0288-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation