Skip to main content
Log in

Goal-Oriented Error Estimates Based on Different FE-Spaces for the Primal and the Dual Problem with Applications to Fracture Mechanics

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to derive goal-oriented a posteriori error estimators for the error obtained while approximately evaluating the nonlinear J-integral as a fracture criterion in linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) using the finite element method. Such error estimators are based on the well-established technique of solving an auxiliary dual problem. In a straightforward fashion, the solution to the discretized dual problem is sought in the same FE-space as the solution to the original (primal) problem, i.e. on the same mesh, although it merely acts as a weight of the discretization error only. In this paper, we follow the strategy recently proposed by Korotov et al. [J Numer Math 11:33–59, 2003; Comp Lett (in press)] and derive goal-oriented error estimators of the averaging type, where the discrete dual solution is computed on a different mesh than the primal solution. On doing so, the FE-solutions to the primal and the dual problems need to be transferred from one mesh to the other. The necessary algorithms are briefly explained and finally some illustrative numerical examples are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ainsworth M, Oden JT (2000) A posteriori error estimation in finite element analysis. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson TL (1995) Fracture mechanics – fundamentals and applications, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Babuška I, Miller A (1984) The post-processing approach in the finite element method. Part 3: a posteriori error estimates and adaptive mesh selection. Int J Numer Meth Eng 20:2311–2324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Becker R, Rannacher R (1996) A feed-back approach to error control in finite element methods: Basic analysis and examples. East–West J Numer Math 4:237–264

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Carstensen C, Funken S (2001) Averaging technique for FE – a error control in elasticity. Part I: Conforming FEM. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:2483–2498

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Cherepanov GP (1967) Crack propagation in continuous media. J Appl Math Mech 31:503–512

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Cirak F, Ramm E (1998) A posteriori error estimation and adaptivity for linear elasticity using the reciprocal theorem. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 156:351–362

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Eriksson K, Estep D, Hansbo P, Johnson C (1995) Introduction to adaptive methods for differential equations. Acta Numer pp 106–158

  9. Giner E, Fuenmayor FJ, Tarancón JE (2004) An improvement of the EDI method in linear elastic fracture mechanics by means of an a posteriori error estimator in G. Int J Numer Meth Eng 59:533–558

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Heintz P, Larsson F, Hansbo P, Runesson K (2004) Adaptive strategies and error control for computing material forces in fracture mechanics. Int J Numer Meth Eng 60:1287–1299

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hlaváček I, Křížek M (1987) On a superconvergent finite element scheme for elliptic systems. I. Dirichlet boundary condition. Appl Math 32:131–154

    Google Scholar 

  12. Korotov S (2006) Error control in terms of linear functionals based on gradient averaging techniques. Comp Lett (in press)

  13. Korotov S, Neittaanmäki P, Repin S (2003) A posteriori error estimation of goal-oriented quantities by the superconvergence patch recovery. J Numer Math 11:33–59

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Larsson F, Hansbo P, Runesson K (2002) On the computation of goal-oriented a posteriori error measures in nonlinear elasticity. Int J Numer Meth Eng 55:879–894

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Rice JR (1968) A path independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain concentration by notches and cracks. J Appl Mech 35:379–386

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rodríguez R (1994) Some remarks on Zienkiewicz-Zhu estimator. Numer Methods Partial Diff Eqs 10:625–635

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Rüter M, Stein E (2004) Adaptive finite element analysis of crack propagation in elastic fracture mechanics based on averaging techniques. Comp Math Sci 31:247–257

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rüter M, Stein E (2006) Goal-oriented a posteriori error estimates in linear elastic fracture mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:251–278

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Rüter M, Heintz P, Larsson F, Hansbo P, Runesson K, Stein E (2002) Strategies for goal-oriented a posteriori error estimation in elastic fracture mechanics. In: Lund E, Olhoff N, Stegmann J (eds) Proceedings of the 15th Nordic Seminar on Computational Mechanics, NSCM 15. Aalborg, Denmark, pp 43–46

  20. Rüter M, Larsson F, Hansbo P, Runesson K, Stein E (2004) Strategies for obtaining goal-oriented a posteriori error estimators in finite elasticity. Submitted to Comput & Struct

  21. Rüter M, Korotov S, Steenbock C (2005) A posteriori error estimates in linear elastic fracture mechanics based on different FE-solution spaces for the primal and the dual problem. Rakenteiden Mekaniikka J Struct Mech 38:87–90

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shih CF, Moran B, Nakamura T (1986) Energy release rate along a three-dimensional crack front in a thermally stressed body. Int J Fract 30:79–102

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stein E, Rüter M (2004) Finite element methods for elasticity with error-controlled discretization and model adaptivity. In: Stein E, de Borst R, Hughes TJR (eds) Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanics. Wiley, Chichester, pp 5–58

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stein E, Rüter M, Ohnimus S (2004) Adaptive finite element analysis and modelling of solids and structures. Findings, problems and trends. Int J Numer Meth Eng 60:103–138

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Steinmann P, Larsson R, Runesson K (1997) On the localization properties of multiplicative hyperelasto-plastic continua with strong discontinuities. Int J Solids Struct 34:969–990

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Steinmann P, Ackermann D, Barth F (2001) Application of material forces to hyperelastostatic fracture mechanics. II. Computational setting. Int J Solids Struct 38:5509–5526

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Xuan ZC, Parés N, Peraire J (2006) Computing upper and lower bounds for the J-integral in two-dimensional linear elasticity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:430–443

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Zienkiewicz OC, Zhu JZ (1987) A simple error estimator and adaptive procedure for practical engineering analysis. Int J Numer Meth Eng 24:337–357

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Zienkiewicz OC, Zhu JZ (1992) The superconvergent patch recovery and a posteriori error estimates. Part 1: The recovery technique. Int J Numer Meth Eng 33:1331–1364

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcus Rüter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rüter, M., Korotov, S. & Steenbock, C. Goal-Oriented Error Estimates Based on Different FE-Spaces for the Primal and the Dual Problem with Applications to Fracture Mechanics. Comput Mech 39, 787–797 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-006-0069-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-006-0069-2

Keywords

Navigation