Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of the optical axis-to-target view angle on endoscopic task performance

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: The location of the optical port and the choice of endoscope determine the angle subtended between the optical axis of the endoscope and the plane of the operation target: the optical axis-to-target view (OATV) angle. The aim of the study was to investigate the influence OATV angle on endoscopic task performance.

Methods: The Dundee Endoscopic Psychomotor Tester was used for objective assessment of endoscopic task performance. Ten surgeons carried out a standard task with the optical axis of the endoscope subtending 90°, 75°, 60° and 45° to the target surface. Each subject underwent three test sessions. Each session consisted of one run with each of the OATV angles in a random order. The outcome measures were the errors rate, the execution time, and the force applied on the target.

Results: The 90° OATV angle had the best accuracy, the shortest execution time, and the lowest force applied on the back plate. The errors rate increased from 17% with the 90° OATV angle to 79% with the 45° angle. There was a significant increase in execution time and force with the decrease in the OATV angle (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: The best task performance is obtained when the optical axis of the endoscope is perpendicular to the target plane.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 2 February 1998/Accepted: 24 July 1998

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hanna, G., Cuschieri, A. Influence of the optical axis-to-target view angle on endoscopic task performance. Surg Endosc 13, 371–375 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900992

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900992

Navigation