Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgical outcomes

What are they and why should they be measured?

  • Editorial
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Harmon JW, Tang DG, Gordon TA, et al (1999) Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection. Ann Surg 230: 404–413

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ritchie WP, Rhodes RS, Biester TW (1999) Work loads and practice patterns of general surgeons in the United States, 1995–1997: a report from the American Board of Surgery. Ann Surg 230: 533–543

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Traverso LW (1993) Clinical manifestations and impact of gallstone disease. Am J Surg 165: 405–409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Traverso LW, Koo KP, Hargrave K, et al (1997) Standardizing laparoscopic procedure time and determining the effects of patient age/gender and presence or absence of surgical residents during operation: a prospective multicenter trail. Surg Endosc 11: 226–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Traverso LW, Lonborg R, Pettingell K, Fenster LF (2000) Utilization of cholecystectomy—a prospective outcome analysis in 1325 patients. J Gastrointest Surg (in press)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Traverso, L.W. Surgical outcomes. Surg Endosc 14, 103–105 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900075

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900075

Navigation