Abstract
Background
Adhesions are believed to be one of the principal causes of chronic pelvic pain. Although there may be some discrepancy between the degree of adhesions and the severity of the symptoms, surgical adhesiolysis is still considered to be useful for the relief of pain.
Methods
A total of 187 patients who underwent laparoscopic adhesiolysis at the Medical University of Ulm, Germany, within a 2-year period were asked to rank their discomfort on a visual pain scale before surgery and up to 1 1/2 years postoperatively.
Results
In this retrospective study, we found that nearly one-third of patients suffered from functional irritations that were either ameliorated or completely relieved by laparoscopic adhesiolysis. When other causes of chronic pain (such as endometriosis) are excluded, the results show that most patients benefited from laparoscopic adhesiolysis.
Conclusions
It appears that laparoscopic adhesiolysis is an effective therapeutic measure to relieve chronic pelvic pain. Therefore, adhesiolysis should be performed in all patients with chronic or intermittent pain, and a complete lysis of adhesions should be planned. However, since pelvic pain may have organic or functional causes other than adhesions, complete adhesiolysis in patients with persistent pelvic pain may be of only limited importance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chan CL, Wood C (1985) Pelvic adhesiolysis: the assessment of symptoms relief by 100 patients. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 25: 295–298
Duigan MP, Jordan JA, Coughlan BM, Logern-Edwards R (1972) One thousand consecutive cases of diagnostic laparoscopy. J Obstet Gynecol Brit Commonwealth 79: 1016–1024
Herschlein HJ, Lechner W (1974) The diagnosis and treatment of pelvic adhesions causing recurrent pelvic pain in cases with normal findings on pelvic palpation. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 34: 303–306
Kolmorgen K, Schulz AM (1991) Results of laparoscopic lysis of adhesions in patients with chronic pelvic pain. Zentralbl Gynäkol 113: 291–295
Kresch AJ, Seifer DB, Sachs LB, Barrese I (1984) Laparoscopy in 100 women with chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 64: 672–674
Lehmann KA, Stern S, Breuker KH (1992) Obstetrical peridural anesthesis with bupivacaine and buprenorphine: a randomized double-blind study in comparison with untreated controls. Anaesthesist 41: 414–422
Malik E, Stoz F, Möbus V, Kreienberg R (1997) Subcostal insertion in the midclavicular line for primary insufflation und inspection in gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 57: 388–390
March CM, Boyers S, Franklin R, Haney AF, Hurst B, Lotze E, Rock JA, Rowe G, Schalaff W (1993) Prevention of adhesions formation/ reformation with the Gore-Tex surgical membrane. In: Diamond MP, di Zerga GS, Linsky CB, Reid RL (eds) Gynecologic surgery and adhesion prevention. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 253–259
Mecke H, Semm K, Lehmann-Willenbrock E (1988) Pelviscopic adhesiolysis: success in treatment of chronic lower abdominal pain in adhesion in the lower abdominal and mesogastric regions. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 48: 155–159
Rapkin AJ (1986) Adhesions and pelvic pain: a retrospective study. Obstet Gynecol 68: 13–15
Tavmergen EN, Mecke H, Semm K (1990) Incidence of intraabdominal adhesions following pelviscopy and laparotomy. Zentralbl Gynäkol 112: 1163–1169
Wipfli-Funke A, Heidrich J, Riedel HH (1995) Chronic abdominal pain: success of laparoscopic/pelviscopic adhesiolysis. Zentralbl Gynäkol 117: 72–76
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malik, E., Berg, C., Meyhöfer-Malik, A. et al. Subjective evaluation of the therapeutic value of laparoscopic adhesiolysis. Surg Endosc 14, 79–81 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900017
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900017