Skip to main content
Log in

Intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy during residency in general surgery

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The role of laparoscopic intraoperative cholangiography (IC) in the diagnosis of asymptomatic choledocholithiasis is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic-therapeutic impact and the educational implications of this method for residents specializing in general surgery.

Methods

We reviewed the records of 835 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystolithiasis without choledocholithiasis. IC was routinely performed by both expert surgeons and residents in general surgery.

Results

The cholecystectomy was completed laparoscopically in 804 cases, but conversion to open surgery was required in 31 cases. IC was not completed in 140 cases (17.4%), and in 44 cases it revealed a suspected choledocholithiasis. The stones were treated via laparoscopy in 36 cases, laparotomy in six cases, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in two cases. Five patients were not diagnosed with choledocholithiasis. In one case, a lesion of the choledochus was discovered and treated laparoscopically. A total of 610 IC were done by expert surgeons and 225 by residents. The duration of the cholecystectomy with IC was significantly different between the two groups (76.9±12 vs 92.4±11), as was the feasibility index (88.6% vs 80.6%).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic IC is a safe and accurate procedure for the diagnosis of unrecognized choledocholithiasis. Teaching of this procedure as part of the specialization in general surgery would be opportune because it would provide surgical residents with an additional tool for the diagnosis and treatment of this pathology of the common bile duct.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Caroll BJ, Friedman RL, Liberman MA, Phillips EH (1996) Routine cholangiography reduces sequelae of common bile duct injuries. Surg Endosc 10: 1194–1197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Duensing RA, Williams RA, Collins JC, Wilson SE (2000) Common bile duct stone characteristics: correlation with treatment choice during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 4: 6–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Flowers JL, Zucker KA, Grahm SM, Scovill WA, Imbembo AL, Bailey RW (1992) Laparoscopic cholangiography: results and indications. Ann Surg 215: 209–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hunter JG (1992) Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration. Am J Surg 163: 53–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Keeling NJ, Menzies D, Motson RW (1999) Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct: beyond the learning curve. Surg Endosc 13: 109–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kondylis PD, Simmons DR, Agarwal SK, Ciardillo KA, Reinhold RB (1997) Abnormal intraoperative cholangiography: treatment options and long-term follow-up. Arch Surg 132: 347–350

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Koo KP, Traverso LW (1996) Do preoperative indicators predict the presence of common bile stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Am J Surg 171: 495–499

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kullman E, Borch K, Lindstrom E, Svanvik J, Anderberg B (1996) Value of routine intraoperative cholangiography in detecting aberrant bile ducts and bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 83: 171–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kullman E, Borch K, Lindstrom E, Svanvik J, Anderberg B (1996) Management of bile duct stones in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: appraisal of routine operative cholangiography and endoscopic treatment. Eur J Surg 162: 873–380

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ladosci LT, Benitez LD, Filippone DR, Nance FC (1997) Intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review of 734 consecutive cases. Am Surg 63: 150–156

    Google Scholar 

  11. Machi J, Tateishi T, Oishi AJ, Furumoto NL, Oishi RH, Uchida S, Sigel B (1999) Laparoscopic ultrasonography versus operative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: review of the literature and a comparison with open intraoperative ultrasonography. J Am Coll Surg 188: 360–367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Olsen D (1997) Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 11: 133–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Paul A, Millat B, Holthausen U, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E (1998) Diagnosis and treatment of common bile duct stones (CBDS): results of a consensus development conference. Surg Endosc 12: 856–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Petelin JB (1993) Laparoscopic approach to common duct pathology. Am J Surg 165: 487–491

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ryberg AA, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Tseng A, Maffi TR, Burr LJ, Doris PE (1997) Abnormal cholangiograms during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is treatment always necessary? Surg Endosc 11: 456–459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sabharwal AJ, Minford EJ, Marson LP, Muir IM, Hill D, Auld CD (1998) Laparoscopic cholangiography: a prospective study. Br J Surg 85: 624–626

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stuart SA, Simpson GI, Alvord LA, Williams MD (1998) Routine intraoperative laparoscopic cholangiography. Am J Surg 176: 632–637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Online publication: 11 May 2001

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bresadola, V., Intini, S., Terrosu, G. et al. Intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy during residency in general surgery. Surg Endosc 15, 812–815 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640090006

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640090006

Key words

Navigation