Skip to main content
Log in

Liver metastases are less established after gasless laparoscopy than after carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and laparotomy in a mouse model

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Although the liver is the most frequent site of cancer recurrence after conventional open surgery for colorectal cancer, the effect of laparoscopic procedures with or without gas insufflation on the development of liver metastases is largely unknown. Methods: Male BALB/C mice inoculated intraportally with colon 26 cells were randomized to undergo carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum (n = 14), abdominal wall lifting (n = 14), or full laparotomy (n = 12), or to serve as control subjects without any procedures other than tumor inoculation (n = 13). Results: The growth of liver metastases 14 days after surgery was enhanced after full laparotomy (p < 0.01) and pneumoperitoneum (p = 0.02), as compared with that in the control subjects, whereas there was no difference in the growth of liver metastases between abdominal wall lifting and the control condition (p = 0.99). Conclusions: These results suggest that the defense against liver metastasis is better preserved after the gasless procedure than after laparotomy and carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum in the reported animal model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ishida, H., Hashimoto, D., Takeuchi, I. et al. Liver metastases are less established after gasless laparoscopy than after carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and laparotomy in a mouse model. Surg Endosc 16, 193–196 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640080173

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640080173

Navigation