Skip to main content
Log in

The development and implementation of a computerized database for clinical research in minimal access surgery

An international pilot study

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The measurement of outcomes after minimal access surgery (MAS) relies on the maintenance of an accurate, prospective clinical database. The development of a system for data management often proves to be challenging, expensive, and extremely time-consuming.

Methods

We developed a computerized relational database for MAS using Microsoft Access 97 to reside on a hospital server, taking advantage of existing network connections, security, and backup systems. The design of the database includes a point-and-click approach with dropdown boxes for diagnoses, procedures, and complications (limited free-text entry). A fundamental feature of this database allows surgeons and surgical trainees to record clinical information at the point and time of data acquisition.

Results

A “beta version” or fully functional draft of the database was presented to a group of surgeons from a variety of specialties (n=8), and a structured interview based on a questionnaire was used to elicit the surgeon’s evaluations of the database. Using the information from the interviews, the database was extensively revised and restructured.

Conclusions

We have developed a relational database that reflects the needs of surgeons interested in clinical research. This database may serve as a template for other centers. It can be expanded to adopt new procedures or modified for other surgical specialties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burney RE, Jones KR, Coon JW, Blewitt DK, Herm A, Peterson M (1997) Core outcomes measures for inguinal hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 165: 509–515

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hawker GA, Coyte PC, Wright JG, Paul JE, Bombardier C (1997) Accuracy of administrative data for assessing outcomes after knee replacement surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 50: 265–273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hlatky M (1991) Using databases to evaluate therapy. Stat Med 10: 647–652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hunt JP, Baker CC, Fakhry SM, Rutledge RR, Ransohoff D, Meyer AA (1999) Accuracy of administrative data in trauma. Surgery 126: 191–197

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hunter JG, Llyon C, Galloway K, Putterill M, van Rij A (1999) Complete clinical outcomes audit. Surg Endosc 13: 699–704

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Online publication: 5 July 2001

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Birch, D.W., Park, A., Bailey, M. et al. The development and implementation of a computerized database for clinical research in minimal access surgery. Surg Endosc 15, 1008–1010 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640080028

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640080028

Key words

Navigation