Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic surgery and Kupffer cell activation

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Evidence tends to support a relative preservation of the systemic immune response with laparoscopy as compared with laparotomy. However, the role of hepatic macrophages, or Kupffer cells, in modulating this immune advantage is unknown. This study investigated the functions of Kupffer cells after either laparoscopy or laparotomy in a rat model.

Methods: Rats underwent laparoscopy, laparotomy, or control operations. Kupffer cells were harvested, cultured, and stimulated with lipopolysaccharide. Culture supernatants were analyzed for tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). Cytoplasmic lysates were analyzed for activation of two mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs).

Results: Production of TNF-α and IL-6 was similar in laparoscopy, laparotomy, and control groups. Both laparotomy and laparoscopy showed increased activation of p38 MAPK as compared with controls. Activation of ERK1/2 was decreased during laparotomy as compared with laparoscopy.

Conclusions: Although cytokine production was similar in the laparoscopy and laparotomy groups, changes in MAPK activation suggest that intracellular pathways are more affected during laparotomy than during laparoscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 1 April 1999/Accepted: 18 August 1999/Online publication: 26 July 2000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vittimberga, F., Nolan, B., Perugini, R. et al. Laparoscopic surgery and Kupffer cell activation. Surg Endosc 14, 1171–1176 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640010065

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640010065

Navigation