Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding and optimizing laparoscopic videosystems

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As tactile feedback and degree of freedom for instrument movement are restricted in laparoscopic surgery, the video image plays the most crucial role in giving the surgeon information about the performance of the operation. The development of small, reliable, high-resolution imaging systems is essential for the surgeon’s acquisition detailed information about the tissues being manipulated. Image quality depends on each component of the laparoscopic imaging unit. In this context, it is crucial for the surgeon to have an understanding of how the video signal is formed, transmitted, and displayed. Moreover, the surgeon also needs to have an idea about the basic principles and specifications of the surgical video systems (i.e. chargecoupled device (CCD) camera, monitors, and digitizers). This knowledge is essential for choosing pieces of equipment and knowing how to assemble them into a functional operating suite. The aim of this review is to provide the surgeon with the basics of video signaling, and to familiarize him or her with the technical principles of the surgical video systems. An insight into the future of laparoscopic video systems also is made, and practical tips for improving image quality and troubleshooting are given throughout the article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berci G, Wren SM, Stain SC, Paz-Partlow M (1995) Individual assessment of visual perception by surgeons observing the same laparoscopic organs with various imaging systems. Surg Endosc 9: 967–973

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Birkett DH (1993) 3D imaging in gastrointestinal laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 7: 556–557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell FW, Gubisch RW (1966) Optical quality of the human eye. J Physiol 186: 558–578

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cartmill J, Aamodt D (1993) Video systems in laparoscopy. In: Graber JN, Schultz LS, Pietrafitta JJ, Hickok DF (eds) Laparoscopic abdominal surgery. McGraw Hill, New York, pp

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chan ACW, Chung SCS, Yim APC, Lau JYW, Ng EKW, Li AKC (1997) Comparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 11: 438–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dion YM, Gaillard F (1997) Visual integration of data and basic motor skills under laparoscopy: influence of 2D and 3D video-camera systems. Surg Endosc 11: 995–1000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Evans B (1995) Understanding digital TV: the route to HDTV. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, pp

    Google Scholar 

  8. Farrel JE (1991) Fitting physical screen parameters to the human eye. In: Roufs JAJ (ed) The man-machine interface. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fuller PN (1996) Microendoscopic surgery: a comparison of four microendoscopes and a review of the literature. Am J Gynecol 174: 1757–1762

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Geis WP (1996) Head-mounted video monitor for global visual access in mini-invasive surgery. Surg Endosc 10: 768–770

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Griffin WP (1994) Three-dimensional imaging in endoscopic surgery. Proceedings of Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI), 29th Annual Meeting and Exposition. Washington, DC, AAMI, 23: 41

  12. Grob B (1984) Basic television and video systems. 5th ed. McGraw Hill, New York, pp

    Google Scholar 

  13. Indman PD (1992) Instruments and video cameras for operative hysteroscopy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 35: 211–225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Klein SA, Carney T (1990) How many bits/m2 are needed for the perfect display? SID Digest 21: 456–459

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lange T (1993) State of the art technique for endoscopic surgery. End Surg 1: 29–35

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mathoas H, Paterson R (1985) Electronic cinematography. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, pp

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mc Dougall EM, Soble JJ, Wolf JS, Nakada SY, Elashry OM, Clayman RV, (1996) Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopic video systems. J Endourology 10: 371–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Morgan MJ (1991) Hyperacuity. In: Regan D (ed) Spatial vision. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp

    Google Scholar 

  19. Prentiss S (1994) HDTV: high-definition television. 2nd ed. TAB books, Blue Ridge Summit, PA, pp 162

    Google Scholar 

  20. Price RR (1993) Image manipulation. In: Wells PNT, Hendee WR (eds) The perception of visual information. Springer Verlag, New York, pp 318–333

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sanfilippo JS, Indman PD (1995) Photo documentation. In: Vitale GC, Sanfilippo JS, Perissat J (eds) Laparoscopic surgery: an atlas for general surgeons. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schwaitzberg SD (1995) Use of microlaparoscopy in diagnosctic procedures: a case report. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5: 407–409

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sippl CJ, Dah F (1981) Video-computers. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp

    Google Scholar 

  24. Surgical video systems used in laparoscopy (1995) Health Devices 24: 28–33

  25. Talamini MA, Gadacz TR (1991) Laparoscopic equipment and instrucmentation. In: Zucker KA (ed) Surgical laparoscopy. Quality Medical Publishing, St. Louis, pp

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tendick F, Bhoyrul S, Way LW (1997) Comparison of laparosopic imaging systems and conditions using a knot-tying task. Comput Aided Surg 2: 24–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Utz P (1984) Do-it-yourself video: a beginner’s guide. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp 27–29

    Google Scholar 

  28. van Bergen P, Kunert W, Schurr W, Buess GF (1996) Comparative study of endoscopic 2D and 3D imaging systems. Langenbeckss Archiv fur Chirurgie 113: 634–637

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Online publication: 2 May 2001

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berber, E., Siperstein, A.E. Understanding and optimizing laparoscopic videosystems. Surg Endosc 15, 781–787 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000391

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000391

Key words

Navigation