Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is laparoscopic appendectomy safe in pregnant women?

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Because of limited laboratory and clinical data, no accepted guidelines concerning the safety of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in pregnancy have been established yet. In this prospective study, we evaluated the safety and outcome of LA in pregnant women as compared with the same control group of pregnant women who underwent open appendectomy (OA) during the same period.

Methods

During the years 1996 to 1999, 11 consecutive pregnant women (mean age, 27 years; range 21–39 years; gestation age range, 7–34 weeks) who underwent LA were prospectively evaluated and compared with a matched group of 11 women (mean age, 30 years; range 18–42 years; gestation age range, 11–37 weeks) who underwent OA. The following parameters were analyzed: obstetric and gynecologic risk factors, length of procedure, perioperative complications, length of stay, and outcome of pregnancy. Both groups were well matched in age and risk factors for pregnancy loss.

Results

There was no significant difference in the length of procedure (60 vs. 46 min) and the complications rate (one in each group) between the LA and OA groups, respectively. There was no conversion in the LA group. The length of postoperative stay was shorter in the LA group (3.6 vs 5.2 days; p=0.05). There was no fetal loss or other adverse outcome of pregnancy in either group, and all the women in both groups had normal full-term delivery. The infants’ development was normal in both groups for a mean follow-up period of 30 months.

Conclusions

According to this relatively small-scale study laparoscopic appendectomy in pregnant women may be as safe as open appendectomy. This procedure is technically feasible in all trimesters of pregnancy and associated with the same known benefits of laparoscopic surgery that nonpregnant patients experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amos JD, Schorr SJ, Norman PF, Poole GV, Thomae KR, Mancino AT, Hall TJ, Scott Conner CE (1996) Laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy. Am J Surg 171: 435–437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barnard JM, Chaffin D, Droste S, Tierney A, Phernetton T (1995) Fetal response to carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum in the pregnant ewe. Obstet Gynecol 85: 669–674

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bennett TL, Estes N (1993) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the second trimester of pregnancy: a case report. J Reprod Med 38: 833–834

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cruz AM, Southerland LC, Duke T, Townsend HG, Ferguson JG, Crone LA (1996) Intra-abdominal carbon dioxide insufflation in the pregnant ewe: uterine blood flow, intra-aminiotic pressure, and cardiopulmonary effects. Anesthesiology 85: 1395–1402

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Curet MJ, Allen D, Josloff RK, Pitcher DE, Curet LB, Miscall BG, Zucker KA (1996) Laparoscopy during pregnancy. Arch Surg 131: 546–550

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Curet MJ, Vogt DA, Schob O, Qualls C, Izquierdo LA, Zucker KA (1996) Effects of CO2 pneumoperitoneum in pregnant ewes. J Surg Res 63: 339–344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gannedahl P, Odeberg S, Brodin LA, Sollevi A (1996) Effects of posture and pneumoperitoneum during anaesthesia on the indices of left ventricular filling. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 40: 160–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gurbuz AT, Peetz ME (1997) The acute abdomen in the pregnant patients: Is there a role for laparoscopy? Surg Endosc 11: 98–102 DOI: 10.1007/s004649900306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ho HS, Saunders CJ, Gunther RA, Wolfe BM (1995) Effector of hemodynamics during laparoscopy: CO2 absorption or intraabdominal pressure?. J Surg Res 59: 497–503

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hunter JG, Swanstron L, Thornburg K (1995) Carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum induces fetal acidosis in a pregnant ewe model. Surg Endosc 9: 272–277

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ivankovich AD, Miletich DJ, Albrecht RF, Heyman HJ, Bonnet RF (1975) Cardiovascular effects of intraperitoneal insufflation with carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide in the dog. Anesthesiology 42: 281–287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Joris JL, Noirot DP, Legrand MJ, Jacquet NJ, Lamy ML (1993) Hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 76: 1067–1071

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Joshi GP, Hein HAT, Ramsay MAE, Foreman ML (1996) Hemodynamic response to anesthesia and pneumoperitoneum in orthotopic cardiac transplant recipients. Anesthesiology 85: 929–933

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kashtan J, Green JF, Parsons EQ, Holcroft JW (1981) Hemodynamic effect of increased abdominal pressure. J Surg Res 30: 249–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Motew M, Ivankovich AD, Bieniarz J, Albrecht RF, Zahed B, Scommegna A (1973) Cardiovascular effects and acid-base and blood gas changes during laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 115: 1002–1012

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schreiber JH (1987) Early experience with laparoscopic appendectomy in women, Surg Endosc 1: 211–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schreiber JH (1990) Laparoscopic appendectomy in pregnancy. Surg Endosc 4: 100–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schwartzberg BS, Conyers JA, Moore JA (1997) First trimester of pregnancy laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 11: 1216–1217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Vaizey CJ, Jacobson MJ, Cross FW (1994) Trauma in pregnancy. Br J Surg 81: 1406–1415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Westerband A, Van-De WJ, Amzallag M, Lebowitz PW, Nwasokwa ON, Chardavoyne R, Abou TA, Wang X, Wise L (1992) Cardiovascular changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 175: 535–538

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Post Office Box 12000, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel

    S. Lyass, A Pikarsky & P. Reissman

  2. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Post Office Box 12000, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel

    V. H. Eisenberg, U. Elchalal & J. G. Schenker

Authors
  1. S. Lyass
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A Pikarsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. H. Eisenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. U. Elchalal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. G. Schenker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. P. Reissman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Online publication: 6 February 2001

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lyass, S., Pikarsky, A., Eisenberg, V.H. et al. Is laparoscopic appendectomy safe in pregnant women?. Surg Endosc 15, 377–379 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000368

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000368

Key words

Search

Navigation