Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic hernioplasty has been criticized because of its technical complexity and increased costs. Disposable dissection balloons can be used to facilitate the creation of the initial working space in totally extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty (TEP), but their use adds to the cost of the operation.
Methods
A total of 322 men with unilateral, primary, or recurrent inguinal hernias were randomized to undergo TEP with or without a dissection balloon.
Results
In the group with the balloon, three of 161 patients (2.5%) required conversion to transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty (TAPP), or open herniorraphy, whereas 17 of 161 patients (10.6%) were converted to TAPP or open herniorraphy in the group without the balloon (p = 0.002). The mean operation time was 55 min in the group with the balloon and 63 min in the group without the balloon (p=0.004). There was no difference between them in postoperative morbidity, and there were no major complications in either group. The recurrence rate was 3.1% in the group with the balloon and 3.7 % in the group without the balloon (p = 0.8).
Conclusion
The use of a dissection balloon in TEP reduces the conversion rate and may be especially beneficial early in the learning curve.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL (1995) An analytic comparison of laparoscopic hernia repair with open “tension-free” hernio-plasty. Int Surg 80: 9–17
Cohen RV, Alvarez G, Roll S, Garcia ME, Kawahara N, Schiavon CA, Schaffa TD, Pereira PR, Margarido NF, Rodrigues AJ (1998) Trans-abdominal or totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair? Surg Laparosc Endosc 8: 264–268
Felix EL, Michas CA, Gonzalez MHJr (1995) Laparoscopic hernio-plasty: TAPP vs TEP. Surg Endosc 9: 984–989
Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Koivukangas P, Hulkko A (1998) A prospective randomized outcome and cost comparison of totally extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty versus Lichtenstein hernia operation among employed patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8: 338–344
Johansson B, Hallerback B, Glise H, Anesten B, Smedberg S, Roman J (1999) Laparoscopic mesh versus open preperitoneal mesh versus conventional technique for inguinal hernia repair: a randomized multicenter trial. SCUR Hernia Repair Study. Ann Surg 230: 225–231
Kald A, Anderberg B, Carlsson P, Park PO, Smedh K (1997) Surgical outcome and cost-minimisation analyses of laparoscopic and open hernia repair: a randomised prospective trial with one-year follow-up. Eur J Surg 163: 505–510
Kald A, Anderberg B, Smedh K, Karlsson M (1997) Transperitoneal or totally extraperitoneal approach in laparoscopic hernia repair: results of 491 consecutive herniorrhaphies. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7: 86–89
Kald A, Nilsson E (1991) Quality assessment in hernia surgery. Qual Assur Health Care 3: 205–210
Kald A, Nilsson E, Anderberg B, Bragmark M, Engstrom P, Gunnarsson U, Haapaniemi S, Lindhagen J, Nilsson P, Sandblom G, Stubberod A (1998) Reoperation as surrogate endpoint in hernia surgery: a three year follow-up of 1565 herniorrhaphies. Eur J Surg 164: 45–50
Katkhouda N, Campos GM, Mavor E, Trussler A, Khalil M, Stoppa R (1999) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a safe approach based on the understanding of rectus sheath anatomy. Surg Endosc 13: 1243–1246 DOI: 10.1007/s004649901237
Knook MT, Weidema WF, Stassen LP, van Steensel CJ (1999) Endoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of primary and recurrent inguinal hernias. Surg Endosc 13: 507–511 DOI: 10.1007/s004649901023
Leibl BJ, Schmedt CG, Ulrich M, Kraft K, Bittner R (1999) Laparoscopic hernia repair—the facts, but no fashion. Langenbecks Arch Surg 384: 302–311
Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montllor MM (1988) Cause and prevention of postherniorrhaphy neuralgia: a proposed protocol for treatment. Am J Surg 155: 786–790
Liem MS, Halsema JA, van der Graaf Y, Schrijvers AJ, van Vroonhoven TJ (1997) Cost-effectiveness of extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized comparison with conventional herniorrhaphy. Coala Trial Group. Ann Surg 226: 668–675 discussion 675-676
Liem MS, van Steensel CJ, Boelhouwer RU, Weidema WF, Clevers GJ, Meijer WS, Vente JP, de Vries LS, van Vroonhoven TJ (1996) The learning curve for totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg 171: 281–285
Marsden A (1962) Inguinal hernia: a three-year review of two thousand cases. Br J Surg 49: 384–394
Nilsson E, Kald A, Anderberg B, Bragmark M, Fordell R, Haapaniemi S, Heuman R, Lindhagen J, Stubberod A, Wickbom J (1997) Hernia surgery in a defined population: a prospective three year audit. Eur J Surg 163: 823–829
Ramshaw BJ, Tucker JG, Conner T, Mason EM, Duncan TD, Lucas GW (1996) A comparison of the approaches to laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Surg Endosc 10: 29–32 DOI: 10.1007/s004649910006
Rutkow IM (1997) Surgical operations in the United States. Then (1983) and now (1994). Arch Surg 132: 983–990
Smith AI, Royston CM, Sedman PC (1999) Stapled and nonstapled laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 13: 804–806 DOI: 10.1007/s004649901104
Stark E, Oestreich K, Wendl K, Rumstadt B, Hagmuller E (1999) Nerve irritation after laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Endosc 13: 878–881 DOI: 10.1007/s004649901124
Wellwood J, Sculpher MJ, Stoker D, Nicholls GJ, Geddes C, Whitehead A, Singh R, Spiegelhalter D (1998) Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost. Br Med J 317: 103–110 erratum in Br Med J 1998; 317: 631 ].
Voitk AJ (1998) The learning curve in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair for the community general surgeon. Can J Surg 41: 446–450
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bringman, S., Ek, Å., Haglind, E. et al. Is a dissection balloon beneficial in totally extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty (TEP)?. Surg Endosc 15, 266–270 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000367
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000367