Skip to main content
Log in

TAVAC: comprehensive review of currently available hemostatic products as adjunct to surgical hemostasis

  • SAGES/EAES Official Publication
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The use of hemostatic agents by general surgeons during abdominal operations is commonplace as an adjunctive measure to minimize risks of postoperative bleeding and its downstream complications. Proper selection of products can be hampered by marginal understanding of their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. While a variety of hemostatic agents are currently available on the market, the choice of those products is often confusing for surgeons. This paper aims to summarize and compare the available hemostatic products for each clinical indication and to ultimately better guide surgeons in the selection and proper use of hemostatic agents in daily clinical practice.

Methods

We utilized PubMed electronic database and published product information from the respective pharmaceutical companies to collect information on the characteristics of the hemostatic products.

Results

All commercially available hemostatic agents in the US are described with a description of their mechanism of action, indications, contraindications, circumstances in which they are best utilized, and expected results.

Conclusion

Hemostatic products come with many different types and specifications. They are valuable tools to serve as an adjunct to surgical hemostasis. Proper education and knowledge of their characteristics are important for the selection of the right agent and optimal utilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ghadimi K, Levy JH, Welsby IJ (2016) Perioperative management of the bleeding patient. Br J Anaesth 117:iii18–iii30. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Price JS, Tackett S, Patel V (2015) Observational evaluation of outcomes and resource utilization from hemostatic matrices in spine surgery. J Med Econ 18(10):777–786. https://doi.org/10.3111/13696998.2015.1046879. Erratum in: J Med Econ. 2016, 19(3):315–7. PMID: 25934148

  3. Ramirez Manuel G, Castillo George F, Ramirez MA (2019) The economic burden of bleeds and transfusions in selected surgeries: a retrospective multi center analysis from the US perspective. Am J Biomed Sci Res 2(5):211–216. https://doi.org/10.34297/AJBSR.2019.02.000610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hughes MJ, Ventham NT, Harrison EM, Wigmore SJ (2015) Central venous pressure and liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 17(10):863–871. https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carson JL, Stanworth SJ, Roubinian N, Fergusson DA, Triulzi D, Doree C, Hebert PC. (2016) Transfusion thresholds and other strategies for guiding allogeneic red blood cell transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (10):CD002042. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub4. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021, (12):CD002042. PMID: 27731885; PMCID: PMC6457993

  6. Connor JP, Destrampe E, Robbins D, Hess AS, McCarthy D, Maloney J (2023) Pre-operative anemia and peri-operative transfusion are associated with poor oncologic outcomes in cancers of the esophagus: potential impact of patient blood management on cancer outcomes. BMC Cancer 23(1):99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10579-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Seong H, Jang Y, Ko E, Lee J, Kim T, Lim CH, Shin HJ, Kim YH, Kim DS (2023) Impact of preoperative red blood cell transfusion on long-term mortality of liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore) 102(37):e34914. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034914

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown KGM, Solomon MJ (2024) Topical haemostatic agents in surgery. Br J Surg 111(1):znad361. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znad361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tam T, Harkins G, Dykes T, Gockley A, Davies M (2014) Oxidized regenerated cellulose resembling vaginal cuff abscess. JSLS. 18(2):353–356. https://doi.org/10.4293/108680813X13693422518597

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou Y, Ma X, Li Z, Wang B (2021) Efficacy, safety, and physicochemical properties of a flowable hemostatic agent made from absorbable gelatin sponge via vacuum pressure steam sterilization. J Biomater Appl 35(7):776–789. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328220950899

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Danker Iii W, DeAnglis A, Ferko N, Garcia D, Hogan A (2020) Comparison of fibrin sealants in peripheral vascular surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 9(61):161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Corral M, Ferko N, Hogan A, Hollmann SS, Gangoli G, Jamous N, Batiller J, Kocharian R (2016) A hospital cost analysis of a fibrin sealant patch in soft tissue and hepatic surgical bleeding. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res 21(8):507–519. https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S112762.PMID:27703386;PMCID:PMC5036832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Koea J, Baldwin P, Shen J, et al. (2015) Safety and hemostatic effectiveness of the fibrin pad for severe soft-tissue bleeding during abdominal, retroperitoneal, pelvic, and thoracic (non-cardiac) surgery: a randomized, controlled, superiority trial. World J Surg 39(11):2663-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3106-5. Erratum in: World J Surg 2015, 39(10):2610. PMID: 26041587

  14. Koea JB, Batiller J, Aguirre N et al (2016) A multicentre, prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing EVARREST™ fibrin sealant patch to standard of care in controlling bleeding following elective hepatectomy: anatomic versus non-anatomic resection. HPB (Oxford) 18(3):221–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2015.12.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Assessment of the hemostatic efficacy of PERCLOT, Surgicel Powder, and Arista in a porcine liver abrasion model. December 2021. Baxter Data on File. REF-36820.

  16. Water Mass Absorbance: PERCLOT versus Arista. August 2014. Baxter Data on File. REF-32407.

  17. Evaluation of the adhesive properties of PERCLOT and Arista. September 2022. Baxter Data on File. REF-37550.

  18. Ortel TL, Mercer MC, Thames EH, Moore KD, Lawson JH (2001) Immunologic impact and clinical outcomes after surgical exposure to bovine thrombin. Ann Surg 233(1):88–96. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200101000-00014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lew WK, Weaver FA (2008) Clinical use of topical thrombin as a surgical hemostat. Biologics 2(4):593–599. https://doi.org/10.2147/btt.s2435

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Baxter Healthcare. FLOSEAL with RECOTHROM instructions for use.

  21. Baxter Healthcare. Data on File.

  22. Stokes ME et al (2011) Impact of bleeding-related complications and/or blood product transfusions on hospital costs in inpatient surgical patients. BMC Health Serv Res 11:135

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Baxter Healthcare (n.d.) TISSEEL [fibrin sealant] full prescribing information. http://baxterpi.com/pi-pdf/Tisseel_PI.pdf

  24. Baxter Data on File. REF-27773.

  25. Maisano F, Kjaergård HK, Bauernschmitt R, Pavie A, Rábago G, Laskar M, Marstein JP, Falk V (2009) TachoSil surgical patch versus conventional haemostatic fleece material for control of bleeding in cardiovascular surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg: Off J Eur Assoc Cardio-Thorac Surg 36(4):708–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.04.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Genyk Y, Kato T, Pomposelli JJ, Wright JK, Sher LS, Tetens V, Chapman WC (2016) Fibrin sealant patch (TachoSil) vs oxidized Regenerated cellulose patch (surgicel original) for the secondary treatment of local bleeding in patients undergoing hepatic resection: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg 222(3):261–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.12.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Baxter Health (n.d.) ARTISS [Fibrin sealant (human)] full prescribing information: http://baxterpi.com/pi-pdf/Artiss_PI.pdf

  28. Spotnitz WD (2014) Fibrin sealant: the only approved hemostat, sealant, and adhesive-a laboratory and clinical perspective. ISRN Surg 4:203943. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/203943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Foster K, Greenhalgh D, Gamelli RL et al (2008) FS 4IU VH S/D clinical study group. Efficacy and safety of a fibrin sealant for adherence of autologous skin grafts to burn wounds: results of a phase 3 clinical study. J Burn Care Res 29(2):293–303. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0b013e31816673f8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. HesterShire TRJR, Nguyen DB, Gerut ZE et al (2013) Randomized, controlled, phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fibrin sealant VH S/D 4 s-apr (Artiss) to improve tissue adherence in subjects undergoing rhytidectomy. Aesthet Surg J 33(4):487–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X13479969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Baxter Healthcare Corporation (2009) COSEAL surgical sealant instructions for use. Hayward, CA

  32. Hill A, Estridge TD, Maroney M et al (2001) Treatment of suture line bleeding with a novel synthetic surgical sealant in a canine iliac PTFE graft model. J Biomed 58:308–312

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wallace DG, Cruise GM, Rhee WM et al (2001) A tissue sealant based on reactive multifunctional polyethylene glycol. J Biomed 58:545–555

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Natour E, Suedkamp M, Dapunt OE (2012) Assessment on the effect of blood loss and transfusion requirements when adding a polyethylene glycol sealant to the anastomotic closure of aortic procedures: a case-control analysis of 102 patients undergoing Bentall procedures. J Cardiothorac Surg 7:105

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Hagberg RC, Safi HJ, Sabik J et al (2004) Improved intraoperative management of anastomotic bleeding during aortic reconstruction: results of a randomized controlled trial. Am Surg 70:307–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Florek H-J, Brunkwall J, Orend K-H, Handley I, Pribble J, Dieck R (2015) Results from a first-in-human trial of a novel vascular sealant. Front Surg 2:29. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2015.00029

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Stone WM, Cull DL, Money SR (2012) A randomized prospective multicenter trial of a novel vascular sealant. Ann Vasc Surg 26(8):1077–1084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tenaxis Medical, Inc. (2013) Clinical evaluation report for ArterX surgical sealant

  39. Tenaxis Medical, Inc. (2013) Summary of safety and effectiveness: ArterX surgical sealant

  40. Chapman WC, Singla N, Genyk Y et al (2007) A phase 3, randomized, double-blind comparative study of the efficacy and safety of topical recombinant human thrombin and bovine thrombin in surgical hemostasis. J Am Coll Surg 205(2):256–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bracey A, Shander A, Aronson S et al (2017) The use of topical hemostatic agents in cardiothoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 105:353–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. CryoLife (2001) Summary of safety and effectiveness CryoLife, Inc., BioGlue surgical adhesive. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf/p010003b.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2023

  43. Artivon (n.d.) BioGlue® Surgical Adhesive–Artivion. https://artivion.com/product/bioglue/. Accessed 15 July 2023

  44. Hoffmann NE, Siddiqui SA, Agarwal S et al (2009) Choice of hemostatic agent influences adhesion formation in a rat cecal adhesion model. J Surg Res 155(1):77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2008.08.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cziperle DJ (2021) Avitene™ Microfibrillar Collagen Hemostat for adjunctive hemostasis in surgical procedures: a systematic literature review. Med Devices (Auckl) 1(14):155–163. https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S298207.PMID:34104007;PMCID:PMC8179802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry (1947) Absorbable gelatin sponge— new and nonofficial remedies. JAMA 135:921

    Google Scholar 

  47. Doria C, Fischer CP, Wood CG, Lifg PM, Marra S, Hart J (2008) Phase 3, randomized, double-blind study of plasma-derived human thrombin versus bovine thrombin in achieving hemostasis in patients undergoing surgery. Curr Med Res Opin 24(3):785–794

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. ClinicalTrials.gov (2007) Evaluation of an absorbable surgical hemostatic agent: Thrombi-Gel® versus Gelfoam-thrombin (control). NCT00652314. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00652314. Accessed 11 Jan, 2023.

  49. Hafer A, Verga J, Sulava E et al (2023) The evaluation of Hemoblast Bellows for arterial hemorrhage control in a swine model of vascular injury. Trauma. https://doi.org/10.1177/14604086231152670

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iswanto Sucandy.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

Dr Salvatore Docimo receives honorarium from Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and BD. Dr. Sharona Ross is a member of the Advisory Board for Intuitive Surgical Inc. Drs. Iswanto Sucandy, Jonathan DeLong, Michael Tran, Fred Qafiti, David Pechman, Tim Snow, Allyson Lim-Dy, Maria Christodoulou and David Renton have no financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sucandy, I., Ross, S., DeLong, J. et al. TAVAC: comprehensive review of currently available hemostatic products as adjunct to surgical hemostasis. Surg Endosc (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10806-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10806-x

Keywords

Navigation