Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Variability in surgical approaches to hernias in patients with ascites

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Hernias in patients with ascites are common, however we know very little about the surgical repair of hernias within this population. The study of these repairs has largely remained limited to single center and case studies, lacking a population-based study on the topic.

Study design

The Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative and its corresponding Core Optimization Hernia Registry (MSQC-COHR) which captures specific patient, hernia, and operative characteristics at a population level within the state was used to conduct a retrospective review of patients with ascites undergoing ventral or inguinal hernia repair between January 1, 2020 and May 3, 2022. The primary outcome observed was incidence and surgical approach for both ventral and inguinal hernia cohorts. Secondary outcomes included 30-day adverse clinical outcomes as listed here: (ED visits, readmission, reoperation and complications) and surgical priority (urgent/emergent vs elective).

Results

In a cohort of 176 patients with ascites, surgical repair of hernias in patients with ascites is a rare event (1.4% in ventral hernia cohort, 0.2% in inguinal hernia cohort). The post-operative 30-day adverse clinical outcomes in both cohorts were greatly increased compared to those without ascites (ventral: 32% inguinal: 30%). Readmission was the most common complication in both inguinal (n = 14, 15.9%) and ventral hernia (n = 17, 19.3%) groups. Although open repair was most common for both cohorts (ventral: 86%, open: 77%), minimally invasive (MIS) approaches were utilized. Ventral hernias presented most commonly urgently/emergently (60%), and in contrast many inguinal hernias presented electively (72%).

Conclusion

A population-level, ventral and incisional hernia database capturing operative details for 176 patients with ascites. There was variation in the surgical approaches performed for this rare event and opportunities for optimization in patient selection and timing of repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Telem DA, Schiano T, Divino CM (2010) Complicated hernia presentation in patients with advanced cirrhosis and refractory ascites: management and outcome. Surgery 148(3):538–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2010.01.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Guo C, Liu Q, Wang Y, Li J (2020) Umbilical hernia repair in cirrhotic patients with ascites: a systemic review of literature. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000891

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ecker BL et al (2014) Hernia repair in the presence of ascites. J Surg Res 190(2):471–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.05.039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang H, Fu J, Qi X, Sun J, Chen Y (2019) Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair in patients with liver cirrhosis accompanied by ascites. Medicine 98(43):e17078. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017078

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Li J, Qin C, Lai D, Hu Y, Wang L (2020) Safety and effectiveness of inguinal hernia repair in patients with liver cirrhosis: a retrospective study and literature review. Hernia 24(3):489–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02087-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Englesbe MJ, Dimick JB, Sonnenday CJ, Share DA, Campbell DAJ (2007) The Michigan surgical quality collaborative: will a statewide quality improvement initiative pay for itself? Ann Surg 246(6):1100–1103. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815c3fe5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Poulose BK et al (2012) Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia 16(2):179–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0879-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brooks DC (2023) Overview of treatment for inguinal and femoral hernia in adults. UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-treatment-for-inguinal-and-femoral-hernia-in-adults/print?search=incidence%20inguinal%20hernia&source=search_result&selectedTitle=3~114&usage_type=default&display_rank=3. Accessed 26 Jan 2023

  9. Weyhe D, Tabriz N, Sahlmann B, Uslar V-N (2017) Risk factors for perioperative complications in inguinal hernia repair—a systematic review. Innov Surg Sci 2(2):47–52. https://doi.org/10.1515/iss-2017-0008

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Howard R et al (2021) Hospital and surgeon variation in 30-day complication rates after ventral hernia repair. Am J Surg 222(2):417–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.12.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Simons MP et al (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 22(1):1–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Juo Y-Y, Skancke M, Holzmacher J, Amdur RL, Lin PP, Vaziri K (2017) Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair in patients with chronic liver disease. Surg Endosc 31(2):769–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5031-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kykalos S, Machairas N, Ntikoudi E, Dorovinis P, Molmenti EP, Sotiropoulos GC (2021) Inguinal hernias in cirrhotic patients: from diagnosis to treatment. Surg Innov 28(5):620–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350621995058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marsman HA, Heisterkamp J, Halm JA, Tilanus HW, Metselaar HJ, Kazemier G (2007) Management in patients with liver cirrhosis and an umbilical hernia. Surgery 142(3):372–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, K08HS025778-01A1, Dana Telem.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Devon E. Cassidy.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Justin Dimick—a cofounder of ArborMetrix, Inc, Dana A Telem—Consulting fees from Medtronic. Devon Cassidy, Zhihong Shao, Ryan Howard, Michael Englesbe, Justin Dimick, Dana A Telem, Anne P Ehlers have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cassidy, D.E., Shao, Z., Howard, R. et al. Variability in surgical approaches to hernias in patients with ascites. Surg Endosc 38, 735–741 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10598-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10598-6

Keywords

Navigation