Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcomes of pneumatic dilation in pediatric caustic esophageal strictures: a descriptive and analytic study from a developing country

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Corrosive substance ingestion in children represents a significant public health issue due to its long-term health sequelae. Esophageal stricture, main complication of this dangerous condition, is treated by pneumatic dilation and eventually by esophageal replacement. We aimed, through this study, to report the outcomes of esophageal pneumatic dilation complicating corrosive substance ingestion in children in a developing country.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was performed on the population of pediatric patients with caustic esophageal stenosis between January 2005 and December 2020. All patients underwent pneumatic balloon dilation. A logistic regression model was built to predict the probability of the occurrence of the event (success/failure) of the dilation. The ROC curve is used to evaluate the performance of the logistic regression model to discriminate between positive and negative values of the dependent variable.

Results

The success rate of pneumatic balloon dilation was 80.4%. The median duration of overall management was 11 months. The severity of caustic stricture observed during endoscopy was significantly linked to worse outcomes (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that the severity of stenosis and the number of dilation sessions were independent risk factors for failure of dilation. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve was 71.7%. A Cut-Off point value of 7 provided the best sensitivity and specificity.

Conclusion

Pneumatic balloon dilation has been proven to be efficacious in infants with caustic esophageal stricture. Pediatric surgeons should take into account factors to promptly switch to replacement surgery and avoid unnecessary and time-consuming serial dilations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Katibe R, Abdelgadir I, McGrogan P, Akobeng AK (2018) Corticosteroids for preventing caustic esophageal strictures: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 66(6):898–902

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tharavej C, Pungpapong S, Chanswangphuvana P (2018) Outcome of dilatation and predictors of failed dilatation in patients with acid-induced corrosive esophageal strictures. Surg Endosc 32(2):900–907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shub MD (2015) Therapy of caustic ingestion: new treatment considerations. Curr Opin Pediatr 27(5):609–613

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rabeh RB, Mazigh S, Yahyaoui S, Boukthir S (2022) Caustic ingestion in Tunisian children: endoscopic findings, complications and predictors of severe injuries in a cohort of 1059 patients. Arch Pediatr 29(8):573–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arnold M, Numanoglu A (2017) Caustic ingestion in children—a review. Semin Pediatr Surg 26:95–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bird J, Kumar S, Paul C, Ramsden J (2017) Controversies in the management of caustic ingestion injury: an evidence-based review. Clin Otolaryngol 42(3):701–708

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Uygun I, Bayram S (2020) Corrosive ingestion managements in children. Esophagus 17(4):365–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Karaman I, Koç O, Karaman A, Erdoğan D, Çavuşoğlu YH, Afşarlar ÇE et al (2015) Evaluation of 968 children with corrosive substance ingestion. Indian J Crit Care Med Peer-Rev Off Publ Indian Soc Crit Care Med 19(12):714

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Küçük G, Göllü G, Ateş U, Çakmak ZA, Koloğlu M, Yağmurlu A et al (2016) Evaluation of esophageal injuries secondary to ingestion of unlabeled corrosive substances: pediatric case series. Arch Argent Pediatr 115:e85

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sánchez-Ramírez CA, Larrosa-Haro A, Vásquez Garibay EM, Larios-Arceo F (2011) Caustic ingestion and oesophageal damage in children: clinical spectrum and feeding practices. J Paediatr Child Health 47(6):378–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Park KS (2014) Evaluation and management of caustic injuries from ingestion of acid or alkaline substances. Clin Endosc 47(4):301–307

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Isa HM, Hasan KA, Ahmed HY, Mohamed AM (2021) Efficacy and safety of endoscopic esophageal dilatation in pediatric patients with esophageal strictures. Int J Pediatr. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1277530

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sami SS, Haboubi HN, Ang Y, Boger P, Bhandari P, De Caestecker J et al (2018) UK guidelines on oesophageal dilatation in clinical practice. Gut 67(6):1000–1023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Taşkinlar H, Bahadir GB, Yiğit D, Erdoğan C, Avlan D, Nayci A (2017) Effectiveness of endoscopic balloon dilatation in grade 2a and 2b esophageal burns in children. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 26(5):300–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Youn BJ, Kim WS, Cheon JE, Kim WY, Shin SM, Kim IO et al (2010) Balloon dilatation for corrosive esophageal strictures in children: radiologic and clinical outcomes. Korean J Radiol 11(2):203–210

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. El-Asmar KM, Allam AM (2021) Predictors of successful endoscopic management of caustic esophageal strictures in children: when to stop the dilatations? J Pediatr Surg 56(9):1596–1599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. El-Asmar KM, Elghandour MM, Allam AM (2021) Iatrogenic esophageal perforation caused by endoscopic dilatation of caustic stricture: current management and possibility of esophageal salvage. J Pediatr Surg 56(4):692–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chang CH, Chao HC, Kong MS, Chen SY, Chen CC, Lai MW (2019) Clinical and nutritional outcome of pediatric esophageal stenosis with endoscopic balloon dilatation. Pediatr Neonatol 60(2):141–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cakmak M, Boybeyi O, Gollu G, Kucuk G, Bingol-Kologlu M, Yagmurlu A et al (2016) Endoscopic balloon dilatation of benign esophageal strictures in childhood: a 15-year experience. Dis Esophagus 29(2):179–184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Uygun I, Arslan MS, Aydogdu B, Okur MH, Otcu S (2013) Fluoroscopic balloon dilatation for caustic esophageal stricture in children: an 8-year experience. J Pediatr Surg 48(11):2230–2234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Marom A, Davidovics Z, Bdolah-Abram T, Ledder O (2022) Endoscopic versus fluoroscopic esophageal dilatations in children with esophageal strictures: 10-year experience. Dis Esophagus 36(1):doac048. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doac048. (PMID: 35796004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mark JA, Anderson BT, Pan Z, Menard-Katcher C, Kramer RE (2019) Comparative analysis of adverse events after esophageal balloon and bougie dilations in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 68(5):630–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tandon S, Burnand KM, De Coppi P, McLaren CA, Roebuck DJ, Curry JI (2019) Self-expanding esophageal stents for the management of benign refractory esophageal strictures in children: a systematic review and review of outcomes at a single center. J Pediatr Surg 54(12):2479–2486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Atabek C, Surer I, Demirbag S, Caliskan B, Ozturk H, Cetinkursun S (2007) Increasing tendency in caustic esophageal burns and long-term polytetraflourethylene stenting in severe cases: 10 years experience. J Pediatr Surg 42(4):636–640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaltsidis H, Mansoor W, Park JH, Song HY, Edwards DW, Laasch HU (2018) Oesophageal stenting: status quo and future challenges. Br J Radiol 91(1091):20170935

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kramer RE, Quiros JA (2010) Esophageal stents for severe strictures in young children: experience, benefits, and risk. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 12:203–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Soccorso G, Parikh DH (2016) Esophageal replacement in children: challenges and long-term outcomes. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 21(3):98

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Eskander A, Ghobrial C, Mohsen NA, Mounir B, Abd EL-Kareem D, Tarek S et al (2019) Histopathological changes in the oesophageal mucosa in Egyptian children with corrosive strictures: a single-centre vast experience. World J Gastroenterol 25(7):870

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben Youssef Sabrine.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Ben Youssef Sabrine, Marwa Messaoud, Belhassen Samia, Ben Fredj Meriem, Ben Salah Radhouane, Ben Mansour Maha, Chakroun Sawsen, Sfar Sami, Mosbahi sana, Ksia Amine, Gara Amel, Zemni Imen, Sahnoun Lassaad, Mekki Mongi, and Belghith Mohsen have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sabrine, B.Y., Messaoud, M., Samia, B. et al. Outcomes of pneumatic dilation in pediatric caustic esophageal strictures: a descriptive and analytic study from a developing country. Surg Endosc 37, 9291–9298 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10489-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10489-w

Keywords

Navigation