Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy and safety of gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (GPOEM) in lung transplant patients with refractory gastroparesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Post-lung transplant gastroparesis is a frequent debilitating complication of lung transplant recipients, as it can increase the risk for gastro-esophageal reflux disease and subsequent graft dysfunction. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GPOEM in lung transplant patients with refractory gastroparesis.

Methods

The present systematic review and meta-analysis wer performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We selected studies that analyzed the gastroparesis cardinal symptom index (GCSI) before and after the procedure to verify the efficacy of GPOEM. Random-effects model was used and the analysis was performed with STATA 17.

Results

Four observational studies (one conference abstract) with 104 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Prior treatments for gastroparesis included prokinetic agents and botulinum toxin in 78% (78/104) and 66.7% (66/99), respectively. Pooled estimate for clinical efficacy of GPOEM was 83% (95% CI 76%–90%). The pooled mean reduction in GCSI following the procedure was − 2.01 (− 2.35, − 1.65, p = 0.014). Three studies reported statistically significant improvement of gastro-esophageal retention or emptying in the post-GPOEM period. 30-day post-operative complications included minor or major bleeding (11.6%), severe reflux (1.2%), and pyloric stenosis (1.2%) requiring re-intervention. 90-day all-cause mortality was 2.6% with one patient dying from severe allograft rejection.

Conclusion

Our study showed that GPOEM is an effective and safe strategy for lung transplant patients with refractory gastroparesis and should be considered as a therapeutic strategy in this population. Larger multicenter trials are needed in the future to further evaluate the effect of GPOEM on allograft function and rates of rejection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bobadilla JL, Jankowska-Gan E, Xu Q et al (2010) Reflux-induced collagen type v sensitization: potential mediator of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Chest 138(2):363–370. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.09-2610

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Verleden GM, Besse T, Maes B (2002) Successful conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus for gastric motor dysfunction in a lung transplant recipient. Transplantation 73(12):1974–1976. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-200206270-00027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Suen HC, Hendrix H, Patterson GA (1999) Physiologic consequences of pneumonectomy. Consequences on the esophageal function. Chest Surg Clin N Am 9(2):475–483

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kayawake H, Chen-Yoshikawa TF, Motoyama H et al (2018) Gastrointestinal complications after lung transplantation in Japanese patients. Surg Today 48(9):883–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-018-1666-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Raviv Y, D’Ovidio F, Pierre A et al (2012) Prevalence of gastroparesis before and after lung transplantation and its association with lung allograft outcomes. Clin Transplant 26(1):133–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0012.2011.01434.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jamie Dy F, Freiberger D, Liu E, Boyer D, Visner G, Rosen R (2017) Impact of gastroesophageal reflux and delayed gastric emptying on pediatric lung transplant outcomes. J Hear Lung Transplant 36(8):854–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2017.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bodet-Milin C, Querellou S, Oudoux A et al (2006) Delayed gastric emptying scintigraphy in cystic fibrosis patients before and after lung transplantation. J Hear Lung Transplant 25(9):1077–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2006.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berkowitz N, Schulman LL, McGregor C, Markowitz D (1995) Gastroparesis after lung transplantation. Potential role in postoperative respiratory complications. Chest 108(6):1602–1607. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.108.6.1602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahmad S, Shlobin OA, Nathan SD (2011) Pulmonary complications of lung transplantation. Chest 139(2):402–411. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.10-1048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Adegunsoye A, Strek ME, Garrity E, Guzy R, Bag R (2017) Comprehensive care of the lung transplant patient. Chest 152(1):150–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Arjuna A, Olson MT, Walia R, Bremner RM, Smith MA, Mohanakumar T (2021) An update on current treatment strategies for managing bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung transplantation. Expert Rev Respir Med 15(3):339–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2021.1835475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Camilleri M, Kuo B, Nguyen L et al (2022) ACG clinical guideline: gastroparesis. Am J Gastroenterol 117(8):1197–1220. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001874

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bai Y, Xu M-J, Yang X et al (2010) A systematic review on intrapyloric botulinum toxin injection for gastroparesis. Digestion 81(1):27–34. https://doi.org/10.1159/000235917

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Khashab MA, Stein E, Clarke JO et al (2013) Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy for refractory gastroparesis: first human endoscopic pyloromyotomy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 78(5):764–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2013.07.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Spadaccini M, Maselli R, Chandrasekar VT et al (2020) Gastric peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy for refractory gastroparesis: a systematic review of early outcomes with pooled analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 91(4):746-752.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. AghaieMeybodi M, Qumseya BJ, Shakoor D et al (2019) Efficacy and feasibility of GPOEM in management of patients with refractory gastroparesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int open 7(3):E322–E329. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0812-1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Martinek J, Hustak R, Mares J et al (2022) Endoscopic pyloromyotomy for the treatment of severe and refractory gastroparesis: a pilot, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Gut 71(11):2170–2178. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2022-326904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rappaport JMP, Raja S, Gabbard S et al (2022) Endoscopic pyloromyotomy is feasible and effective in improving post-lung transplant gastroparesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 164(3):711-719.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.10.063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ichkhanian Y, Hwang JH, Ofosu A et al (2022) Role of gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (GPOEM) in post-lung transplant patients: a multicenter experience. Endosc Int open 10(6):E832–E839. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1797-9587

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Vitton V, BenoîtD’Journo X, Reynaud-Gaubert M, Barthet M, Gonzalez J-M (2021) Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (GPOEM) for severe gastroparesis after lung transplantation: A promising minimally invasive option. Clin Transplant 35(9):e14434. https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.14434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Li A, Ofosu A, Kim W, Podboy A, Esquivel M, Hwang JH (2021) Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (GPOEM) improves symptoms and need for hospital admission for gastroparesis and lung transplant patients. Am J Gastroenterol 116:S466

  22. Xu J, Chen T, Elkholy S et al (2018) Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (GPOEM) as a treatment for refractory gastroparesis: long-term outcomes. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018:6409698. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6409698

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Revicki DA, Rentz AM, Dubois D et al (2003) Development and validation of a patient-assessed gastroparesis symptom severity measure: the gastroparesis cardinal symptom index. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 18(1):141–150. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01612.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D et al (2014) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses

  26. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327(7414):557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Podboy A, Clarke J, Nguyen L, Mooney J, Dhillon GS, Hwang J (2020) Outcomes of gastric per-oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy for severe gastroparesis in a lung transplant patient population. J Hear Lung Transplant 39(4):S317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2020.01.714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ichkhanian Y, Vosoughi K, AghaieMeybodi M et al (2021) Comprehensive analysis of adverse events associated with gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy: an international multicenter study. Surg Endosc 35(4):1755–1764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07570-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kamal F, Khan MA, Lee-Smith W et al (2022) Systematic review with meta-analysis: one-year outcomes of gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy for refractory gastroparesis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 55(2):168–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.16725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Spadaccini M, Maselli R, Thoguluva-Chandrasekar V et al (2019) Gastricperoral endoscopic pyloromyotomy for refractory gastroparesis: a systematic review with pooled analysis. United Eur Gastroenterol J 7(8):975–976. https://doi.org/10.1177/205064061985467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Khush KK, Cherikh WS, Chambers DC et al (2018) The international thoracic organ transplant registry of the international society for heart and lung transplantation: thirty-fifth adult heart transplantation report-2018; focus theme: multiorgan transplantation. J Hear lung Transplant Off Publ Int Soc Hear Transplant 37(10):1155–1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2018.07.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hathorn KE, Chan WW, Lo W-K (2017) Role of gastroesophageal reflux disease in lung transplantation. World J Transplant 7(2):103–116. https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v7.i2.103

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Li A, Ofosu A, Kim W, Podboy A, Esquivel M, Hwang JH (2021) Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (GPOEM) improves symptoms and need for hospital admission for gastroparesis and lung transplant patients. Am J Gastroenterol 116:S466. https://doi.org/10.1409/01.ajg.0000777436.28650.16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Verleden SE, Sacreas A, Vos R, Vanaudenaerde BM, Verleden GM (2016) Advances in understanding bronchiolitis obliterans after lung transplantation. Chest 150(1):219–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2016.04.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Blackett JW, Benvenuto L, Leiva-Juarez MM, D’Ovidio F, Arcasoy S, Jodorkovsky D (2022) Risk Factors and outcomes for gastroparesis after lung transplantation. Dig Dis Sci 67(6):2385–2394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07249-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Derousseau T, Chan WW, Cangemi D, Kaza V, Lo W-K, Gavini S (2022) Delayed gastric emptying in prelung transplant patients is associated with posttransplant acute cellular rejection independent of reflux. J Clin Gastroenterol 56(2):e121–e125. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000001502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no specific grant support from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Spyros Peppas.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Spyridon Peppas, Dr. Akram I Ahmad, Dr. Nadera Altork, and Dr. Won Kyoo Cho have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 14 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peppas, S., Ahmad, A.I., Altork, N. et al. Efficacy and safety of gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (GPOEM) in lung transplant patients with refractory gastroparesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 37, 6695–6703 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10287-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10287-4

Keywords

Navigation