Skip to main content
Log in

Injuries incurred from minimally invasive access for abdominal surgery

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Injuries during initial port placement in minimally invasive abdominal surgery are rare but can cause major morbidity. We aimed to characterize the incidence, consequence, and risk factors for injury occurring on initial port placement.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of a General Surgery quality collaborative database with supplementary input from the Morbidity and Mortality conference database at our institution between 6/25/2018 and 6/30/2022. Patient characteristics, operative details, and postoperative course were assessed. Cases with an injury on entry were compared to cases without an injury to identify risk factors for injury.

Results

8844 minimally invasive cases were present between the two databases. Thirty-four injuries (0.38%) occurred during initial port placement. Seventy-one percent of injuries were bowel injuries (full or partial thickness) and the majority (79%) of injuries were recognized during the index operation. Median surgeon experience for the cases with an injury was 9 years (IQR 4.25–14.5) compared to 12 years of experience for all surgeons contributing to the database (p = 0.004). Previous laparotomy was also significantly correlated with the rate of injury on entry (p = 0.012). There was no significant difference in the rate of injury based on method of entry (cut-down: 19 (55.9%), optical entry without Veress: 10 (29.4%), Veress followed by optical entry: 5 (14.7%), p = 0.11). BMI > 30 kg/m2 (injury: 16/34 vs no injury: 2538/8844, p = 0.847) was not associated with an injury. Fifty-six percent (19/34) of patients with an injury on initial port placement required laparotomy at some point in their hospital course.

Conclusions

Injuries are rare during initial port placement for minimally invasive abdominal surgery. In our database, history of a previous laparotomy was a significant risk factor for an injury and appears to be more consequential than commonly implicated factors such as technique, patient body habitus, or surgeon experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Compeau C, McLeod NT, Ternamian A (2011) Laparoscopic entry: a review of Canadian general surgical practice. Can J Surg 54(5):315–320. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.011210

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Jansen FW, Kapiteyn K, Trimbos-Kemper T, Hermans J, Trimbos JB (1997) Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre observational study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 104(5):595–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11539.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fuller J, Ashar BS, Carey-Corrado J (2005) Trocar-associated injuries and fatalities: An analysis of 1399 reports to the FDA. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12(4):302–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2005.05.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahmad G, Baker J, Finnerty J, Phillips K, Watson A (2019) Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD006583. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Merlin TL, Hiller JE, Maddern GJ, Jamieson GG, Brown AR, Kolbe A (2003) Systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of methods used to establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 90(6):668–679. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Djokovic D, Gupta J, Thomas V et al (2016) Principles of safe laparoscopic entry. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 201:179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.03.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Molloy D, Kaloo PD, Cooper M, Nguyen TV (2002) Laparoscopic entry: a literature review and analysis of techniques and complications of primary port entry. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 42(3):246–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0004-8666.2002.00246.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Larobina M, Nottle P (2005) Complete Evidence Regarding Major Vascular Injuries During Laparoscopic Access. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 15(3):119–123. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sle.0000166967.49274.ca

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bonjer HJ, Hazebroek EJ, Kazemier G, Giuffrida MC, Meijer WS, Lange JF (1997) Open versus closed establishment of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 84(5):599–602

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM (1992) Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111(5):518–526

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chandler JG, Corson SL, Way LW (2001) Three spectra of laparoscopic entry access injuries. J Am Coll Surg 192(4):478–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1072-7515(01)00820-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brill A, Nezhat F, Nezhat C, Nezhat C (1995) The incidence of adhesions after prior laparotomy: a laparoscopic appraisal. Obstet Gynecol 85(2):269–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-7844(94)00352-E

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vilos GA, Ternamian A, Dempster J et al (2007) Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 29(5):433–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35496-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ott J, Jaeger-Lansky A, Poschalko G, Promberger R, Rothschedl E, Wenzl R (2012) Entry techniques in gynecologic laparoscopy—a review. Gynecol Surg 9(2):139–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-011-0710-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marret H, Harchaoui Y, Chapron C, Lansac J, Pierre F (1998) Trocar injuries during laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. Report from the French society of gynaecological laparoscopy: TROCAR INJURIES. Gynaecol Endosc 7(5):235–241. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2508.1998.00197.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McIlwaine K, Cameron M, Readman E, Manwaring J, Maher P (2011) The effect of patient body mass index on surgical difficulty in gynaecological laparoscopy. Gynecol Surg 8(2):145–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-010-0636-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Poulose BK, Rosen MJ (2018) The Role and Impact of Registries on Abdominal Wall Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 142:197S-200S. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004878

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Judith French, PhD and Jie Dai, Phd for assistance with the database queries.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Maskal.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Clayton Petro has research grants from Central Surgical Association, American Hernia Society and SAGES. Michael Rosen is the medical director of Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative and has stock options with Ariste. Ajita Prabhu accepts speaking fees and research support paid to institution from Intuitive Surgical, consulting fees and is on the Advisory Board for CMR Surgical, and accepts consulting fees from Verb Surgical. Lucas Beffa accepts honoraria from Intuitive Surgical. Sara Maskal, Ryan Ellis, Benjamin Miller, and David Krpata have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maskal, S., Ellis, R., Prabhu, A. et al. Injuries incurred from minimally invasive access for abdominal surgery. Surg Endosc 37, 5368–5373 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10031-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10031-y

Keywords

Navigation