Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The SAGES MASTERS program presents: the top 10 seminal articles for laparoscopic left and sigmoid colectomy pathway for uncomplicated disease

  • SAGES/EAES official publication
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

As one of the 8 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Masters Program clinical pathways, the Colorectal Pathway aims to deliver educational content for the general surgeon organized along 3 levels of performance (competency, proficiency and mastery) each represented by an anchoring procedure. In this article, the SAGES Colorectal Task Force presents focused summaries of the top 10 seminal articles selected for laparoscopic left/sigmoid colectomy for uncomplicated disease.

Methods

Using a systematic literature search of Web of Science, the most cited articles on laparoscopic left and sigmoid colectomy were identified, reviewed, and ranked by members of the SAGES Colorectal Task Force. Additional articles not identified in the literature search were included if deemed impactful by expert consensus. The top 10 ranked articles were then summarized, including their findings, strengths and limitations with emphasis on relevance and impact in the field.

Results

The top 10 articles selected focus on variations in minimally invasive surgical techniques, video demonstrations, stratified approaches for benign and malignant disease as well as assessments of the learning curve.

Conclusions

The selected top 10 seminal articles for laparoscopic left and sigmoid colectomy in uncomplicated disease are considered by the SAGES colorectal task force to be fundamental to the knowledge base of minimally invasive surgeons as they progress to mastery in these procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hull L, Sevdalis N (2015) Advances in teaching and assessing nontechnical skills. Surg Clin North Am 95:869–884

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Szasz P, Louridas M, Harris KA, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP (2015) Assessing technical competence in surgical trainees: a systematic review. Ann Surg 261:1046–1055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jones DB et al (2017) SAGES University MASTERS Program: a structured curriculum for deliberate, lifelong learning. Surg Endosc 31:3061–3071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Keller DS et al (2022) The SAGES MASTERS program presents: the 10 seminal articles for the laparoscopic right colectomy pathway. Surg Endosc 36:4639–4649

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Rickard MJFX, Keshava A, Toh JWT (2017) Three steps and a join: a simple guide to right- and left-sided medial to lateral laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 21:673–677

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Milone M, Milone F (2017) Segmental left colectomy: a modified caudal-to-cranial approach. Surg Endosc 31:1487–1487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Masoni L et al (2013) Preservation of the inferior mesenteric artery via laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy performed for diverticular disease: real benefit or technical challenge: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Surg Endosc 27:199–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Williams E et al (2021) Utility of intra-operative flexible sigmoidoscopy to assess colorectal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anz J Surg 91:546–552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Midura EF et al (2015) Risk factors and consequences of anastomotic leak after colectomy: a national analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 58:333–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schlussel AT et al (2017) Location is everything: The role of splenic flexure mobilization during colon resection for diverticulitis. Int J Surg (London, England) 40:124–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bonnet S et al (2012) High tie versus low tie vascular ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer surgery: impact on the gain in colon length and implications on the feasibility of anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum 55:515–521

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Leraas HJ et al (2017) Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy improves perioperative outcomes without increasing operative time compared to the open approach: a national analysis of 8791 patients. J Gastrointest Surg 21:684–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Braga M et al (2010) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open left colonic resection. Br J Surg 97:1180–1186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Cirocchi R et al (2019) Sigmoid resection for diverticular disease – to ligate or to preserve the inferior mesenteric artery? Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 21:623–631

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ricciardi R et al (2009) Anastomotic leak testing after colorectal resection: what are the data? Arch Surg-chicago 144:407–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mitchem JB et al (2018) What is the optimal management of an intra-operative air leak in a colorectal anastomosis? Colorectal Dis 20:O39–O45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mari GM et al (2018) Low ligation of inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer reduces genitourinary dysfunction: results from a randomized controlled trial (HIGHLOW Trial). Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zeng J, Su G (2018) High ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery during sigmoid colon and rectal cancer surgery increases the risk of anastomotic leakage: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 16:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lacy AM et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Veldkamp R et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group et al (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank Dimitrios Stefanidis, MD, PhD for his help with the editing of this manuscript.

Funding

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sami A. Chadi.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Chadi reports consultancy fees on behalf of Stryker. Dr. Boutros reports teaching honorarium from Minogue, Stryker, and Johnson & Johnson. Dr. Harzman reports grant funding from Activ Surgical, partial support in SAGES annual meeting attendance, and leadership/fiduciary role in the Association for Surgical Education Foundation. Dr. Kaiser reports consultancy fees and honorarium on behalf of Intuitive Surgical for case proctoring and lectures, and McGraw-Hill Publisher book royalties. Dr. Sylla reports consultancy fees on behalf of Stryker, Ethicon, Medtronic, Olympus, RedDress, Safeheal, and GI Windows. Drs. Colibaseanu, Da Silva, Francone, Garrett, Hawkins, Lee-Kong, and Olson have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chadi, S.A., Boutros, M., Colibaseanu, D.T. et al. The SAGES MASTERS program presents: the top 10 seminal articles for laparoscopic left and sigmoid colectomy pathway for uncomplicated disease. Surg Endosc 37, 2528–2537 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-09899-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-09899-7

Keywords

Navigation