Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of the radiofrequency identification lung marking system: a multicenter study in Japan

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The radiofrequency identification (RFID) lung marking system is a novel technique using near-field radio-communication technology. The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility and feasibility of this system in the resection of small pulmonary nodules.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of 182 patients who underwent sublobar resection with the RFID marking system between March 2020 and November 2021 in six tertial hospitals in Japan. Target markings were bronchoscopically made within 3 days before surgery. The contribution of the procedure to the surgery and safety was evaluated.

Results

Target nodule average diameter and depth from the lung surface were 10.9 ± 5.4 mm and 14.6 ± 9.9 mm, respectively. Radiologically, one third of nodules appeared as pure ground-glass nodules (GGNs) on CT. The average distance from target nodule to RFID tag was 8.9 ± 7.1 mm. All surgical procedures were completed by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Planned resection was achieved in all cases without any complications. The surgeons evaluated this system as helpful in 93% (necessary: 67%, useful; 26%) of cases. Nodule radiological features (p < 0.001) and type of surgery (p = 0.0013) were associated with the degree of contribution. In most cases, identification of the RFID tag was required within 1 min despite adhesion (p = 0.27).

Conclusion

The RFID lung marking system was found to be safe and effective during successful sublobar resection. Patients with pure GGNs are the best candidates for the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CT:

Computed tomography

GGN:

Ground-glass nodule

GGO:

Ground-glass opacity

RFID:

Radiofrequency identification

VAL-MAP:

Virtual-assisted lung mapping

References

  1. Tanaka N, Waseda R, Saito D, Ohsima M, Matsumoto I, Takemura H (2001) A novel fluorescent lung-marking technique using the photodynamic diagnosis endoscope system and vitamin B2. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 31:853–859

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nakajima J (2019) Advances in techniques for identifying small pulmonary nodules. Surg Today 49:311–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tomiyama N, Yasuhara Y, Nakajima Y, Adachi S, Arai Y, Kusumoto M, Eguchi K, Kuriyama K, Sakai F, Noguchi M, Murata K, Murayama S, Mochizuki T, Mori K, Yamada K (2006) CT-guided needle biopsy of lung lesions: a survey of severe complication based on 9783 biopsies in Japan. Eur J Radiol 59:60–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sato M, Kobayashi M, Kojima F, Tanaka F, Yanagiya M, Kosaka S, Fukai R, Nakajima J (2018) Effect of virtual-assisted lung mapping in acquisition of surgical margins in sublobar lung resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 156:1691–1701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yutaka Y, Sato T, Tanaka S, Miyahara S, Yoshizawa A, Morita S, Date H (2022) Feasibility study of a novel wireless localization technique using radiofrequency identification markers for small and deeply located lung lesions. JTCVS Tech 12:185–195

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sato T, Yutaka Y, Nakamura T, Date H (2020) First clinical application of radiofrequency identification (RFID) marking system—Precise localization of a small lung nodule. JTCVS Tech 4:301–304

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ginsberg RJ, Rubinstein LV (1995) Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 60:615–623

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Saji H, Okada M, Tsuboi M, Nakajima R, Suzuki K, Aokage K, Aoki T, Okami J, Yoshino I, Ito H, Okumura N, Yamaguchi M, Ikeda N, Wakabayashi M, Nakamura K, Fukuda H, Nakamura S, Mitsudomi T, Watanabe S, Asamura H, West Japan Oncology Group and Japan Clinical Oncology Group (2022) Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in small-sized peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 399:1607–1617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Suzuki K, Watanabe S, Wakabayashi M, Saji H, Aokage K, Moriya Y, Yoshino I, Tsuboi M, Nakamura S, Nakamura K, Mitsudomi T, Asamura H, West Japan Oncology Group and Japan Clinical Oncology Group (2022) A single-arm study of sublobar resection for ground-glass opacity dominant peripheral lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 163:289–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Suzuki K, Nagai K, Ohmatsu H (1999) Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for small indeterminate pulmonary nodules: Indications for preoperative marking. Chest 115:563–568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cardillo G, Regal M, Sera F, Martino M, Carbone L, Facciolo F, Martelli M (2003) Videothoracoscopic management of the solitary pulmonary nodule: a single-institution study on 429 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 75:1607–1611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Powell TI, Joanne DJ, Clifton JC, Guerra HL, Church N, English J, Evans K, Yee J, Coxson H, Mayo JR, Finley RJ (2004) Peripheral lung nodules: fluoroscopically guided video-assisted thoracoscopic resection after computed tomography-guided localization using platinum microcoils. Ann Surg 240:481–489

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lizza N, Eucher P, Haxhe JP, Wispelaere JFD, Johnson PM, Delaunois L (2001) Thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary nodules after computed tomographic-guided coil labeling. Ann Thorac Surg 71:986–988

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sancheti MS, Lee R, Ahmed SU, Pickens A, Fernandez FG, Small WC, Nour SG, Force SD (2014) Percutaneous fiducial localization for thoracoscopic wedge resection of small pulmonary nodules. Ann Thorac Surg 97:1914–1919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hanauer M, Perentes JY, Krueger T, Ris HB, Bize P, Schmidt S, Gonzalez M (2016) Pre-operative localization of solitary pulmonary nodules with computed tomography-guided hook wire: report of 181 patients. J Cardiothorac Surg 11:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kleedehn M, Kim DH, Lee FT, Lubner MG, Robbins JB, Ziemlewicz TJ, Hinshaw JL (2016) Preoperative pulmonary nodule localization: a comparison of methylene blue and hookwire techniques. Am J Roentgenol 207:1334–1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McConnell PI, Feola GP, Meyers RL (2002) Methylene blue-stained autologous blood for needle localization and thoracoscopic resection of deep pulmonary nodules. J Pediatr Surg 37:1729–1731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Watanabe K, Nomori H, Ohtsuka T, Kaji M, Naruke T, Suemasu K (2006) Usefulness and complications of computed tomography-guided lipiodol marking for fluoroscopy-assisted thoracoscopic resection of small pulmonary nodules: experience with 174 nodules. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 132:320–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sato M, Omasa M, Chen F, Sato T, Sonobe M, Bando T, Date H (2014) Use of virtual assisted lung mapping (VAL-MAP), a bronchoscopic multispot dye-marking technique using virtual images, for precise navigation of thoracoscopic sublobar lung resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 147:1813–1819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Park CH, Han K, Hur J, Lee SM, Lee JW, Hwang SH, Seo JS, Lee KH, Kwon W, Kim TH, Choi BW (2007) Comparative effectiveness and safety of preoperative lung localization for pulmonary nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest 151:316–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin MW, Chen JS (2016) Image-guided techniques for localizing pulmonary nodules in thoracoscopic surgery. J Thorac Dis 8:S749–S755

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Asano F, Eberhardt R, Herth FJF (2014) Virtual bronchoscopic navigation for peripheral pulmonary lesions. Respiration 88:430–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Qian K, Krimsky WS, Sarkar SA, Deng Y (2009) Efficiency of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy and virtual bronchoscopic navigation. Ann Thorac Surg 109:1731–1740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xu C, Wang Y, Li L, Yuan Q, Wang Y, Hu H, Zhang X (2021) Diagnostic value of virtual bronchoscopic navigation combined with endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial lung biopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions. Technol Cancer Res Treat 20:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Reisenauer J, Duke JD, Kern R, Bessy SF, Edell E (2022) Combining shape-sensing robotic bronchoscopy with mobile three-dimensional imaging to verify tool-in-lesion and overcome divergence: a pilot study. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes 6:177–185

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen AC, Pastis N, Mahajan AK, Khandhar SJ, Simoff MJ, Machuzak M, Cicenia J, Gildea TR, Silvestri GA (2021) Robotic bronchoscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions: a multicenter pilot and feasibility study (Benefit). Chest 159:845–852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shinagawa N, Yamazaki K, Onodera Y, Asahina H, Kikuchi E, Asano F, Miyasaka K, Nishimura M (2007) Factors related to diagnostic sensitivity using an ultrathin bronchoscope under CT guidance. Chest 131:549–553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to So Miyahara.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Yojiro Yutaka, Hiroshi Date and Toshihiko Sato have a financial relationship with HOGY Medical Co Ltd. Drs. So Miyahara, Ryuichi Waseda, Yuichirou Ueda, Jun Suzuki, Hiroyuki Oizumi, Masashi Goto, Tatsuo Nakagawa, Fumitsugu Kojima, Masaru Takenaka and Fumihiro Tanaka have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 22 kb)

Supplementary file2 (MPG 39192 kb)—This video demonstrates the sequence of the process of the RFID tag placement and surgery.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miyahara, S., Waseda, R., Ueda, Y. et al. Evaluation of the radiofrequency identification lung marking system: a multicenter study in Japan. Surg Endosc 37, 3619–3626 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09858-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09858-8

Keywords

Navigation