Skip to main content
Log in

The formation process and mechanism of gastrointestinal anastomosis after retrieval anchor-assisted endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy: a preclinical study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is a promising method of treating gastric outlet obstruction. However, no study has investigated gastrointestinal anastomosis formation after EUS-GE. We aimed to evaluate the formation of gastrointestinal anastomosis after EUS-GE in a porcine model.

Methods

Retrieval anchor-assisted EUS-GE was performed on 15 Bama mini pigs. Five pigs each were randomly euthanized 3, 7, and 14 days postoperatively to evaluate the formation of gastrointestinal anastomosis and measure the anastomotic distance. The expression of transforming growth factor-β1(TGF-β1) and Smad3 in the anastomosis site were examined by immunohistochemistry.

Results

EUS-GE was successfully performed in all 15 pigs. The mean procedure time was 29.2 ± 6.0 (range 18–40) minutes. The anastomotic distance was 34.0 ± 3.6 cm in 14 pigs. The site of gastroenterostomy of one pig was at the ileum. For pigs euthanized 3 days postoperatively, the structure was mechanically maintained by a stent. For pigs euthanized 7 or 14 days postoperatively, the stomach and small intestine were anastomosed to form a stable structure. The level of TGF-β1 and Smad3 in the anastomosis site gradually increased from 3 to 14 days after EUS-GE. TGF-β1 and Smad3 expression had a significant difference between 3 days, 7 days, and 14 days after EUS-GE (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

For EUS-GE, the stomach and small intestine were initially linked together mechanically and spontaneously anastomosed to form a stable structure 7 days postoperatively. TGF-β1 and Smad3 play an important role in the formation of a stable structure of gastrointestinal anastomosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coronel E, Chapman CG, Matthews J et al (2018) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy for the treatment of gastroduodenal obstruction in severe chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopy 50:285–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang G, Liu X, Wang S et al (2019) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy: a promising alternative to surgery. J Transl Int Med 7:93–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Manuel-Vazquez A, Latorre-Fragua R, Ramiro-Perez C et al (2018) Laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy for gastric outlet obstruction in patients with unresectable hepatopancreatobiliary cancers: a personal series and systematic review of the literature. World J Gastroenterol 24:1978–1988

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Debourdeau A, Caillol F, Zemmour C et al (2021) Endoscopic management of concomitant biliary and duodenal malignant obstruction: impact of the timing of drainage for one vs. two procedures and the modalities of biliary drainage. Endosc Ultrasound. 10:124–133

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Iqbal U, Khara HS, Hu Y et al (2020) EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for the management of gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Ultrasound 9:16–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ge PS, Young JY, Dong W et al (2019) EUS-guided gastroenterostomy versus enteral stent placement for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Surg Endosc 33:3404–3411

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Perez-Miranda M, Tyberg A, Poletto D et al (2017) EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy versus laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy: an international collaborative study. J Clin Gastroenterol 51:896–899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Khashab MA, Bukhari M, Baron TH et al (2017) International multicenter comparative trial of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy versus surgical gastrojejunostomy for the treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Endosc Int Open 5:E275–E281

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Parsa N, Nieto JM, Powers P et al (2020) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic walled-off necrosis using 20-mm versus 15-mm lumen-apposing metal stents: an international, multicenter, case-matched study. Endoscopy 52:211–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Khan Z, Hayat U, Moraveji S et al (2021) EUS-guided pancreatic ductal intervention: a comprehensive literature review. Endosc Ultrasound 10:98–102

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Luk SW, Irani S, Krishnamoorthi R, Wong Lau JY et al (2019) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage versus percutaneous cholecystostomy for high risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 51:722–732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dhindsa BS, Mashiana HS, Dhaliwal A et al (2020) EUS-guided biliary drainage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Ultrasound 9:101–109

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kakked G, Salameh H, Cheesman AR et al (2020) Primary EUS-guided biliary drainage versus ERCP drainage for the management of malignant biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Ultrasound 9:298–307

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Sakamoto Y, Hijioka S, Maruki Y et al (2019) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy using a metal stent for the treatment of afferent loop syndrome. Endoscopy 51:E153–E155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Oung B, Faller J, Lienhart-Chambon I et al (2020) Single-step endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy and ERCP in patient with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy after right lobe hepatectomy. Endoscopy 52:E229–E231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang W, Qi K, Jin Z et al (2019) Endoscopic exchange of a lumen-apposing metal stent after endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy in severe acute pancreatitis. Endoscopy 51:E18–E19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen YI, James TW, Agarwal A et al (2018) EUS-guided gastroenterostomy in management of benign gastric outlet obstruction. Endosc Int Open 6:E363-e368

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller CS, Chen YI, Haito Chavez Y et al (2020) Double-balloon endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy: simplifying a complex technique towards widespread use. Endoscopy 52:151–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Binmoeller KF, Shah JN (2012) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy using novel tools designed for transluminal therapy: a porcine study. Endoscopy 44:499–503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Collin A, Brahmia S, Rostain F et al (2021) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy with water-jet filling technique through a 19G needle to treat complete malignant duodenal obstruction. Endoscopy 53:E7–E8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hu J, Zhang K, Sun S (2019) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided retrievable puncture anchor-assisted gastroenterostomy. Dig Endosc 31:e11–e12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hu J, Wang G, Zhang K et al (2020) Retrieval anchor-assisted endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy for gastric outlet obstruction. Scand J Gastroenterol 55:865–868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by National Key Research and Development Project of China to Siyu Sun (Grant No. 2017YFC0109803), University innovation team and innovative talent support program of Liaoning province(Grant No. LR2019073) and 345 talent project of Jinlong Hu.

Funding

Funding was provided by 345 Talent Project, National Key Research and Development Project (2017YFC0109803), and University Innovation Team and Innovative Talent Support Program of Liaoning Province (LR2019073).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JH drafted the manuscript. JH, GW, HG and SS performed the study. SS designed the study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siyu Sun.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Siyu Sun is the consultant of Vedkang Medical Science and Technology company and Microtech Technology company. Jinlong Hu, Guoxin Wang, Haixin Gao and Shiyun Sheng have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, J., Wang, G., Gao, H. et al. The formation process and mechanism of gastrointestinal anastomosis after retrieval anchor-assisted endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy: a preclinical study. Surg Endosc 37, 2043–2049 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09565-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09565-4

Keywords

Navigation