Skip to main content
Log in

Redefining the role of routine postoperative bloodwork following uncomplicated bariatric surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A quality improvement opportunity was identified to de-adopt the low-value care practice of routinely performing bloodwork for all patients undergoing elective bariatric surgery. While these patients are typically discharged on postoperative day 1 (POD1) after bloodwork is performed, it is uncommon for the discharge plan to change due to unexpected laboratory abnormalities alone.

Methods

Patients undergoing bariatric surgery between September 2020 and April 2021 only had POD1 bloodwork if there were perioperative clinical concerns, they had insulin-dependent diabetes, or they were therapeutically anticoagulated. Thirty-day Emergency Department (ED) visits and readmissions were monitored as balancing measures. Outcomes were compared to a control group that underwent bariatric surgery prior to September 2020 when POD1 laboratory testing was routinely performed. Financial and environmental costs were estimated based our institutional standards.

Results

The intervention group consisted of 303 patients: 248 (82%) Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses and 55 (18%) sleeve gastrectomies. Most patients (n = 256, 84.5%) did not have POD1 bloodwork. Twelve (3.9%) had bloodwork performed in violation of our protocol, of which none had a change in management based on the results. Of the 35 (12%) who had appropriately ordered bloodwork, 6 (2%) required a transfusion and 2 (0.7%) required a second surgery on the same admission for hemorrhage. Forty-four (14.5%) had 30-day ED visits of which 17 (5.6%) were within 7 days. Sixteen (5.3%) were readmitted. There were no significant differences between intervention and control groups in the rate of transfusion, second surgery, or 30-day ED visits. The avoidance of POD1 bloodwork saved approximately $6602.24 in lab processing fees alone and 512 test tubes.

Conclusion

POD1 bloodwork can be safely avoided in the absence of clinical concerns. In addition to not significantly increasing postoperative complications, there were benefits from a financial cost, environmental impact, and patient discomfort perspective.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Levinson W, Huynh T (2014) Engaging physicians and patients in conversations about unnecessary tests and procedures: choosing Wisely Canada. CMAJ 186(5):325–326. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.131674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mafi JN, Parchman M (2018) Low-value care: an intractable global problem with no quick fix. BMJ Qual Saf 27(5):333–336. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Choosing Wisely Canada, Anesthesiology (2018) Five things physicians and patients should question. Choosing Wisely Canada, Toronto, ON. https://choosingwiselycanada.org/anesthesiology/

  4. Murphy AM, Tunitsky-Bitton E, Krlin RM, Barber MD, Goldman HB (2013) Utility of postoperative laboratory studies after female pelvic reconstructive surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 209(4):363.e1-363.e3635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Manning BT, Sankaranarayanan S, Hassanzadeh H, Nandyala SV, Marquez-Lara A, Naqvi A, Elboghdady IM, Noureldin M, Singh K (2014) The utility of obtaining routine hematological laboratory values following an anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion. Spine 39(20):E1228–E1232. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Halawi MJ, Plourde JM, Cote MP (2019) Routine postoperative laboratory tests are not necessary after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 34(3):538–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.11.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Niven DJ, Mrklas KJ, Holodinsky JK, Straus SE, Hemmelgarn BR, Jeffs LP, Stelfox HT (2015) Towards understanding the de-adoption of low-value clinical practices: a scoping review. BMC Med 13:255. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0488-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program. American College of Surgeons. https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/mbsaqip. Accessed 28 Sept 2021

  9. Mostello AJ, Tenpenny W, Lingamfelter M, Wu ES (2020) Daily postoperative complete blood counts after primary total joint arthroplasty may not always be necessary. Orthopedics 43(1):e31–e36. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20191031-08

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Howell EP, Kildow BJ, Karas V, Green CL, Cunningham DJ, Ryan SP, Bolognesi MP, Seyler TM (2019) Clinical impact of routine complete blood counts following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 34(7S):S168–S172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. United Nations Climate Action (2019) https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/climate-action-areas.shtml.

  12. World Health Organisation (WHO) (2019). https://www.who.int/health-topics/climate-change#tab=tab_1.

  13. Mortimer F, Isherwood J, Wilkinson A, Vaux E (2018) Sustainability in quality improvement: redefining value. Future Healthc J 5(2):88–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Penny T, Collins M, Whiting A, Aumonier S (2015). Care pathways: guidance of appraising sustainability. coalition for sustainabile pharmaceuticals and medical devices.

  15. Presley B, Isenberg JD (2020) Ultrasound guided intravenous access. StatPearls Publishing, In StatPearls

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajajee Selvam.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Rajajee Selvam, Amer Jarrar, Cynthia Meghaizel, Joseph Mamazza, Amy Neville, Caolan Walsh, and Nicole Kolozsvari have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Selvam, R., Jarrar, A., Meghaizel, C. et al. Redefining the role of routine postoperative bloodwork following uncomplicated bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 37, 364–370 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09518-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09518-x

Keywords

Navigation