Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ventral hernia repair and mesh use in females of childbearing age

  • 2022 SAGES Oral
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A substantial knowledge gap exists in understanding sex as a biological variable for abdominal wall hernia repair, which also extends to hernia repair practices in females of childbearing age. We sought to determine the incidence of mesh repairs in females of childbearing age and to characterize factors associated with mesh use.

Methods

Using a statewide hernia-specific data registry, we conducted a retrospective study identifying females of childbearing age, defined as 18–44 per CDC guidelines, who underwent clean ventral hernia repair between January 2020 and Dec 2021. The primary outcome was mesh use. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with mesh use. To further delineate whether childbearing status may affect decision to use mesh, we also examined mesh practice stratified by age, comparing women 18 to 44 to those 45 and older.

Results

Eight hundred and thirty-six females of childbearing age underwent ventral hernia repair with a mean age of 34.8 (6.2) years. Mesh was used in 547 (65.4%) patients. Mesh use was significantly associated with minimally invasive approach [aOR 29.46 (95% CI 16.30–53.25)], greater hernia width [aOR 1.50 (95% CI 1.20–1.88)], and greater BMI [aOR 1.05 (95% CI 1.03–1.08)]. Age was not significantly associated with mesh use [aOR 1.02 (95% CI 0.99–1.05)]. Compared to 1,461 female patients older than 44 years old, there was no significant association between childbearing age and mesh use [aOR 0.77 (95% CI 0.57–1.04)].

Conclusions

Most females of childbearing age had mesh placed during ventral and incisional hernia repair, which was largely associated with hernia size, BMI, and a minimally invasive surgical approach. Neither chronologic patient age nor being of childbearing age were associated with mesh use. Insofar as existing evidence suggests that childbearing status is an important factor in deciding whether to use mesh, these findings suggest that real-world practice may not reflect that evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burcharth J, Pedersen MS, Pommergaard HC et al (2015) The prevalence of umbilical and epigastric hernia repair: a nationwide epidemiologic study. Hernia 19(5):815–819

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jensen KK, Henriksen NA, Jorgensen LN (2015) Abdominal wall hernia and pregnancy: a systematic review. Hernia 19(5):689–696

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Oma E, Henriksen NA, Jensen KK (2019) Ventral hernia and pregnancy: a systematic review. Am J Surg 217(1):163–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaufmann R, Halm JA, Eker HH et al (2018) Mesh versus suture repair of umbilical hernia in adults: a randomised, double-blind, controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet 391(10123):860–869

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jafri SM, Vitous CA, Dossett LA et al (2020) Surgeon attitudes and beliefs toward abdominal wall hernia repair in female patients of childbearing age. JAMA Surg 155(6):528–530

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Oma E, Bisgaard T, Jorgensen LN et al (2019) Nationwide propensity-score matched study of mesh versus suture repair of primary ventral hernias in women with a subsequent pregnancy. World J Surg 43(6):1497–1504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nouh T, Ali FS, Krause KJ et al (2018) Ventral hernia recurrence in women of childbearing age: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 22(6):1067–1075

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Howard R, Ehlers A, Delaney L et al (2021) Leveraging a statewide quality collaborative to understand population-level hernia care. Am J Surg 222(5):1010–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Healy MA, Regenbogen SE, Kanters AE et al (2017) Surgeon variation in complications with minimally invasive and open colectomy: results from the Michigan Surgical Quality collaborative. JAMA Surg 152(9):860–867

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ehlers AP, Thumma JR, Howard R et al (2022) Guideline-discordant care among females undergoing groin hernia repair: the importance of sex as a biologic variable. Hernia 26(3):823–829

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Henriksen NA, Montgomery A, Kaufmann R et al (2020) Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society. Br J Surg 107(3):171–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Oma E, Jensen KK, Jorgensen LN et al (2020) Incisional hernia repair in women of childbearing age: a nationwide propensity-score matched study. Scand J Surg 109(4):295–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Oma E, Jensen KK, Bisgaard T et al (2020) Association of primary ventral hernia and pregnancy. Ann Surg 272(1):170–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Howard R, Telem D (2019) Gender matters: mandating sex as a biologic variable in hernia research. Ann Surg 270(1):10–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Memtsoudis SG, Besculides MC, Swamidoss CP (2006) Do race, gender, and source of payment impact on anesthetic technique for inguinal hernia repair? J Clin Anesth 18(5):328–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Asolati M, Huerta S, Sarosi G et al (2006) Predictors of recurrence in veteran patients with umbilical hernia: single center experience. Am J Surg 192(5):627–630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vu JV, Gunaseelan V, Dimick JB et al (2019) Mechanisms of age and race differences in receiving minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 33(12):4032–4037

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Bowman K, Telem DA, Hernandez-Rosa J et al (2010) Impact of race and socioeconomic status on presentation and management of ventral hernias. Arch Surg 145(8):776–780

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eldridge L, Berrigan D (2022) Structural racism and triple-negative breast cancer among Black and White Women in the United States. Health Equity 6(1):116–123

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Brathwaite S, West-Livingston L, Williams D et al (2021) Moving forward: recommendations to overcome existing structural racism. J Vasc Surg 74(2S):47S-55S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dana Telem.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Mary Shen has no disclosures. Dr. Ryan Howard receives unrelated funding from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (5T32DK108740-05). Dr. Anne Ehlers receives unrelated funding from the Association for Academic Surgeons and SAGES. Ms. Lia Delaney and Mr. Quintin Solano have no disclosures. Dr. Michael Englesbe receives unrelated funding from the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, and salary support from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan. The Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative is funded as part of the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Value Partnership program. Dr. Justin Dimick receives grant funding from the NIH, AHRQ, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation, and is a cofounder of ArborMetrix, Inc. Dr. Dana Telem receives funding from AHRQ K08HS025778-01A1 and receives consulting fees from Medtronic. The content of this study is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the official views of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan. No funder or sponsor had any role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Dr. Shen and Dr. Howard had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, M.R., Howard, R., Ehlers, A.P. et al. Ventral hernia repair and mesh use in females of childbearing age. Surg Endosc 37, 3084–3089 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09429-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09429-x

Keywords

Navigation