Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the prognosis of BCLC stage A ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma patients after undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or hepatectomy: a propensity score-matched landmark analysis

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

At present, the choice of treatment modalities for ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma patients in BCLC stage A remains controversial, and this study compared the overall survival of ruptured HCC patients undergoing TACE or hepatectomy.

Methods

A total of 283 ruptured HCC patients treated at our liver surgery center were included in our study, of which 175 were treated with hepatectomy and 108 were treated with TACE. To reduce selection bias, we used a propensity score matching (PSM) model, which yielded a total of 88 pairs of patients. We used the Kaplan–Meier method to compare the long-term prognosis, and the Landmark method was used to compare the short-term and long-term prognoses of patients after PSM. Finally, we performed subgroup analysis according to whether it met the Milan criteria.

Results

After PSM, in the hepatectomy group, the 1-, 3-, and 5 year OS rates were 73.4%, 45.4%, and 33.9%, respectively. In the TACE group, the 1-, 3-, and 5 year OS rates were 58.5%, 40.6%, and 23.2%, respectively. Within one year, the hepatectomy group had a better prognosis than the TACE group (P = 0.022), but there was no difference in long-term survival(P = 0.936). In the subgroup analysis, in patients who met the Milan criteria, the survival curve indicated that there was no statistically significant difference in the survival prognosis between the two groups (P = 0.294) HR = 1.56(0.68–3.59); in the patients beyond the Milan criteria, the survival time was 28.0 months (20.0–34.0) in patients who underwent hepatectomy and 18 months (9.8–26.2) in patients who underwent TACE, and the survival curve indicated a statistically significant difference (P = 0.043) HR = 1.57(1.01–2.43).

Conclusion

Our propensity score-matched study found that ruptured HCC patients treated by hepatectomy had a better short-term prognosis than those treated by TACE, but there was no difference in the long-term prognosis between the two treatment groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Couri T, Pillai A (2019) Goals and targets for personalized therapy for HCC. Hep Intl 13:125–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sayiner M, Golabi P, Younossi ZM (2019) Disease burden of hepatocellular carcinoma: a global perspective. Dig Dis Sci 64:910–917

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang W, Wei C (2020) Advances in the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gene Dis 7:308–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Xie DY, Ren ZG, Zhou J, Fan J, Gao Q (2020) 2019 Chinese clinical guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: updates and insights. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 9:452–463

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Fujii M, Miyake H, Takamura K, Tashiro S (2004) Management of spontaneous ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 105:292–295

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lai EC, Lau WY (2006) Spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review. Archives Surg 141:191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Moris D, Chakedis J, Sun SH, Spolverato G, Tsilimigras DI, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Spartalis E, Pawlik TM (2018) Management, outcomes, and prognostic factors of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review. J Surg Oncol 117:341–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoshida H, Mamada Y, Taniai N, Uchida E (2016) Spontaneous ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology Res 46:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu LX, Wang GS, Fan ST (1996) Spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 83:602–607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Altieri MS, Yang J, Yin D, Frenkel C, Talamini M, Telem DA, Pryor A (2017) Presence of a fellowship improves perioperative outcomes following hepatopancreatobiliary procedures. Surg Endosc 31:2918–2924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mintz Y, Horgan S, Cullen J, Stuart D, Falor E, Talamini MA (2008) NOTES: a review of the technical problems encountered and their solutions. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18:583–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chan WH, Hung CF, Pan KT, Lui KW, Huang YT, Lin SY, Lin YY, Wu TH, Yu MC (2016) Impact of spontaneous tumor rupture on prognosis of patients with T4 hepatocellular carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 113:789–795

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bolondi L, Burroughs A, Dufour JF, Galle PR, Mazzaferro V, Piscaglia F, Raoul JL, Sangro B (2012) Heterogeneity of patients with intermediate (BCLC B) hepatocellular carcinoma: proposal for a subclassification to facilitate treatment decisions. Semin Liver Dis 32:348–359

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Forner A, Reig ME, de Lope CR, Bruix J (2010) Current strategy for staging and treatment: the BCLC update and future prospects. Semin Liver Dis 30:61–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Llovet JM, Brú C, Bruix J (1999) Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification. Semin Liver Dis 19:329–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tsilimigras DI, Bagante F, Sahara K, Moris D, Hyer JM, Wu L, Ratti F, Marques HP, Soubrane O, Paredes AZ, Lam V, Poultsides GA, Popescu I, Alexandrescu S, Martel G, Workneh A, Guglielmi A, Hugh T, Aldrighetti L, Endo I, Pawlik TM (2019) Prognosis after resection of barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) Stage 0, A, and B hepatocellular carcinoma: a comprehensive assessment of the current BCLC classification. Ann Surg Oncol 26:3693–3700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang W, Zhang ZW, Zhang BX, Huang ZY, Zhang WG, Liang HF, Chen XP (2019) Outcomes and prognostic factors of spontaneously ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 23:1788–1800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhu Q, Li J, Yan JJ, Huang L, Wu MC, Yan YQ (2012) Predictors and clinical outcomes for spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 18:7302–7307

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Jin YJ, Lee JW, Park SW, Lee JI, Lee DH, Kim YS, Cho SG, Jeon YS, Lee KY, Ahn SI (2013) Survival outcome of patients with spontaneously ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma treated surgically or by transarterial embolization. World J Gastroenterol 19:4537–4544

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Xu X, Chen C, Liu Q, Huang X (2020) A Meta-analysis of TAE/TACE versus emergency surgery in the treatment of ruptured HCC. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 43:1263–1276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Guo Z, Zhong JH, Jiang JH, Zhang J, Xiang BD, Li LQ (2014) Comparison of survival of patients with BCLC stage A hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatic resection or transarterial chemoembolization: a propensity score-based analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 21:3069–3076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Benedetto U, Head SJ, Angelini GD, Blackstone EH (2018) Statistical primer: propensity score matching and its alternatives. Euro J Cardio-Thoracic Surg 53:1112–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Reiffel JA (2020) Propensity score matching: the “devil is in the details” where more may be hidden than you know. Am J Med 133:178–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schneeweiß S, Horger M, Ketelsen D, Ioanoviciu SD (2015) Complications after TACE in HCC. RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin 36:79–82

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tsurusaki M, Murakami T (2015) Surgical and locoregional therapy of HCC: TACE. Liver Cancer 4:165–175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Chung J, Yu JS, Chung JJ, Kim JH, Kim KW (2010) Haemodynamic events and localised parenchymal changes following transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation for hepatic malignancy: interpretation of imaging findings. Br J Radiol 83:71–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee KH, Sung KB, Lee DY, Park SJ, Kim KW, Yu JS (2002) Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: anatomic and hemodynamic considerations in the hepatic artery and portal vein. Radiographics 22:1077–1091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Murata S, Mine T, Sugihara F, Yasui D, Yamaguchi H, Ueda T, Onozawa S, Kumita S (2014) Interventional treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 20:13453–13465

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Scheiner B, Ulbrich G, Mandorfer M, Reiberger T, Müller C, Waneck F, Trauner M, Kölblinger C, Ferlitsch A, Sieghart W, Peck-Radosavljevic M, Pinter M (2019) Short- and long-term effects of transarterial chemoembolization on portal hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. United Europ Gastroenterol J 7:850–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li J, Huang L, Liu CF, Cao J, Yan JJ, Xu F, Wu MC, Yan YQ (2014) Risk factors and surgical outcomes for spontaneous rupture of BCLC stages A and B hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-control study. World J Gastroenterol 20:9121–9127

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ding Y, Liu K, Xu Y, Zhao Q, Lou S, Xiang X, Yan L, Cao Z, Xie Q, Zhu C, Bao S, Wang H (2020) Combination of inflammatory score/liver function and AFP improves the diagnostic accuracy of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Med 9:3057–3069

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Witjes CD, van der Eijk AA, Hansen BE, Verhoef C, de Man RA (2011) Quantitative HBV DNA and AST are strong predictors for survival after HCC detection in chronic HBV patients. Netherlands J Med 69:508–513

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Yang JG, He XF, Huang B, Zhang HA, He YK (2018) Rule of changes in serum GGT levels and GGT/ALT and AST/ALT ratios in primary hepatic carcinoma patients with different AFP levels. CBM 21:743–746

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang LX, Lv Y, Xu AM, Wang HZ (2019) The prognostic significance of serum gamma-glutamyltransferase levels and AST/ALT in primary hepatic carcinoma. BMC Cancer 19:841

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhou L, Wang SB, Chen SG, Qu Q, Rui JA (2018) Prognostic value of ALT, AST, and AAR in hepatocellular carcinoma with B-type hepatitis-associated cirrhosis after radical hepatectomy. Clin Lab 64:1739–1747

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Famularo S, Di Sandro S, Giani A, Bernasconi DP, Lauterio A, Ciulli C, Rampoldi AG, Corso R, De Carlis R, Romano F, Braga M, Gianotti L, De Carlis L (2020) Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria. A weighted comparative study of surgical resection versus chemoembolization. HPB (Oxford) 22:1349–1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hsu CY, Hsia CY, Huang YH, Su CW, Lin HC, Pai JT, Loong CC, Chiou YY, Lee RC, Lee FY, Huo TI, Lee SD (2012) Comparison of surgical resection and transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria: a propensity score analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 19:842–849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Delis SG, Bakoyiannis A, Tassopoulos N, Athanassiou K, Kelekis D, Madariaga J, Dervenis C (2010) Hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma exceeding Milan criteria. Surg Oncol 19:200–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Garancini M, Nespoli S, Romano F, Uggeri F, Degrate L, Okolicsanyi S, Gianotti L (2018) Surgical management of hepatocellular carcinoma within and beyond BCLC indications in a middle volume center. J Visc Surg 155:275–282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ueno M, Hayami S, Shigekawa Y, Kawai M, Hirono S, Okada K, Tamai H, Shingaki N, Mori Y, Ichinose M, Yamaue H (2015) Prognostic impact of surgery and radiofrequency ablation on single nodular HCC ⩽5 cm: cohort study based on serum HCC markers. J Hepatol 63:1352–1359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The research is funded by (1)Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province[2019CFB433]. (2)Hengrui Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Malignant Tumor Research Fund-Youth Research Fund[CXPJJH11800001-2018306]. (3) Sources of funding: Key project of science and technology in Hubei Province [2018ACA137]. (4) General Project of Health Commission of Hubei Province [WJ2021M108].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Feng Xia, Qiao Zhang, Xiaoping Chen, Bixiang Zhang, Elijah Ndhlovu, Mingyu Zhang, and Peng Zhu declare no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, F., Zhang, Q., Chen, X. et al. Comparison of the prognosis of BCLC stage A ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma patients after undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or hepatectomy: a propensity score-matched landmark analysis. Surg Endosc 36, 8992–9000 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09351-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09351-2

Keywords

Navigation