Abstract
Background
Resident involvement in the operating room is a vital component of their medical education. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) represents the paradigmatic minimally invasive training procedure, both due to its prevalence and its different forms of complexity. We aim to evaluate whether the supervised participation of residents as operative surgeons in LC of different degrees of complexity affects postoperative outcomes in a university hospital.
Methods
This is a retrospective, single-center study that included all consecutive adult (> 18 years old) patients operated for a LC between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2017. Each surgical procedure was recorded according to the level of complexity that we established in three types of categorization (level 1: elective surgery; level 2: cholecystitis; level 3: biliary instrumentation). Patients were clinically monitored at an outpatient clinic 7 and 30-day postoperative. Postoperative outcomes of patients operated by supervised residents (SR) and trained surgeons (TS) were compared. Postoperative complications were graded according to the Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications.
Results
A total of 2331 patients underwent LC during the study period, of whom 1573 patients (67.5%) were operated by SR and 758 patients (32.5%) by TS. There were no significant differences among age, sex, and BMI between patients operated in both groups, with the exception of ASA (P = 0.0001). Intraoperative cholangiography was performed in 100% of the patients, without bile duct injuries. There were no deaths in the 30 postoperative days. The overall complication rate was 5.70% (133 patients), with no significant differences when comparing LC performed by SR and TS (5.09 vs. 6.99%; P = 0.063). The severity rates of complications were similar in both groups (P = 0.379). Patient readmission showed a statistical difference comparing SR vs TS (0.76% vs. 2.2%; P = 0.010). The postoperative complications rate according to the complexity level of LC was not significant in level 1 and 2 for both groups. However in complexity level 3 the TS group experienced a greater rate of complications compared to the SR group (18.12% vs. 9.38%; P = 0.058). In the multivariate analysis, the participation of the residents as operating surgeons was not independently associated with an increased risk of complications (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.84–1.77; P = 0.275), neither other risk factors like age ≥ 65 years, BMI, complexity level 2–3, or ASA ≥ 3–4. The association of another surgical procedure with the LC was an independent factor of morbidity (OR 3.85, 95% CI 2.54–5.85; P = 0.000).
Conclusion
Resident involvement in LC with different degrees of complexity did not affect postoperative outcomes. The participation of a resident as operating surgeon is not an independent risk factor and may be considered ethical, safe, and reliable whenever implemented in the background of a residency-training program with continuous supervision and national accreditation. The sum of other procedures not related to a LC should be taken as a risk factor of morbidity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pellegrini CA (2006) Surgical education in the United States. Ann Surg 244:335–342. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000234800.08200.6c
Calatayud D, Arora S, Aggarwal R, Kruglikova I, Schulze S, Funch-Jensen P et al (2010) Warm-up in a virtual reality environment improves performance in the operating room. Ann Surg 251(6):1181–1185
Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P (2004) Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91(2):146–150
Gauger PG, Hauge LS, Andreatta PB, Hamstra SJ, Hillard ML, Arble EP et al (2010) Laparoscopic simulation training with proficiency targets improves practice and performance of novice surgeons. Am J Surg 199(1):72–80
Pekolj J, Alvarez FA, Palavecino M, Clariá RS, Mazza O, de Santibañes E (2013) Intraoperative management and repair of bile duct injuries sustained during 10,123 laparoscopic cholecystectomies in a high-volume referral center. J Am Coll Surg 216:894–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.01.051
Strasberg SM (2002) Avoidance of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:543–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005340200071
Alvarez FA, de Santibañes M, Palavecino M, Sánchez Clariá R, Mazza O, Arbues G et al (2014) Impact of routine intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy on bile duct injury. Br J Surg 101(6):677–684
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213
National Institutes of Health (1992) NIH, Office of Medical Applications of Research. Gallstones and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. NIH Consensus Development Conference, September 14–16, 1992: Consensus Statement, p 28
Weiss AJ, Elixhauser A, Andrews RM (2014) Characteristics of Operating Room Procedures in U.S. Hospitals, 2011: Statistical Brief #170. In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), Rockville
Bridges M, Diamond DL (1999) The financial impact of teaching surgical residents in the operating room. Am J Surg 177:28–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00289-x
Kauvar DS, Braswell A, Brown BD, Harnisch M (2006) Influence of resident and attending surgeon seniority on operative performance in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Surg Res 132(2):159–163
Helling TS, Khandelwal A (2008) The challenges of resident training in complex hepatic, pancreatic, and biliary procedures. J Gastrointest Surg 12(1):153–158
Haney CM, Karadza E, Limen EF, de Santibanes M, Kinny-Köster B, Müller PC et al (2020) Training and learning curves in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: from simulation to mastery. J Pancreatol 3(2):101–110
Gaba DM (2007) The future vision of simulation in healthcare. Simul Healthc 2:126–135. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sih.0000258411.38212.32
Nasri B, Saxe J (2019) Impact of residents on safety outcomes in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 43(12):3013–3018
Funding
No funding was provided.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study conception and design: PU, MC, and MDS. Acquisition of data: PU, MC, and VA. Analysis and interpretation of data: MC, PU, VA, RS, OM, MP, EDS, JP, and MDS. Drafting of the manuscript: MC, PU, VA, RS, OM, MP, EDS, JP, and MDS. Critical revision: MC, PU, VA, RS, OM, MP, EDS, JP, and MDS.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Maria Emilia Cano, Pedro Uad, Victoria Ardiles, Rodrigo Sanchez Claria, Oscar Mazza, Martin Palavecino, Eduardo de Santibañes, Juan Pekolj, and Martín de Santibañes have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cano, M.E., Uad, P., Ardiles, V. et al. Impact of resident involvement on patient outcomes in laparoscopic cholecystectomy of different degrees of complexity: analysis of 2331 cases. Surg Endosc 36, 8975–8980 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09349-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09349-w