Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic liver resection with “ultrasonic scalpel mimic CUSA" technique

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 09 September 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Liver parenchymal transection is the most critical step for laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). Ultrasonic scalpel (Harmonic) is a common used energy instrument in LLR; however, it is only recommended for superficial layer transection and the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) is recommended for deep layer dissection. We herein introduce the “Harmonic mimic CUSA” technique for LLR.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of the patients who underwent LLR using CUSA or the “Harmonic mimic CUSA” for parenchymal transection between July 2018 and October 2020 at West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Observation indicators included general demographic information, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion volume, complication rate, hospital stay, and the costs. Perioperative data was compared between the two groups by propensity score matching analysis (PSM).

Results

A total of 298 patients, including 192 in Harmonic group and 106 in CUSA group, were enrolled in this study. After a 1:1 PSM, 99 patients using “Harmonic mimic CUSA” were matched with 99 patients via CUSA for parenchymal transection in LLRs. The Harmonic group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss (mean, 150 ml vs. 250 ml, P < 0.001), shorter operative time (mean 170 min vs. 250 min, P < 0.001) and less costs (mean 6723$ vs. 8307$, P < 0.001). The conversion to laparotomy, length of postoperative hospital stay, complications were comparable between the two groups. There perioperative mortality was nil.

Conclusion

The “Harmonic mimic CUSA” technique is safe, simple and feasible for LLR, which may be an alternative to CUSA for LLR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

On request.

Change history

References

  1. Schmidbauer S, Hallfeldt KK, Sitzmann G, Kantelhardt T, Trupka A (2002) Experience with ultrasound scissors and blades (ultracision) in open and laparoscopic liver resection. Ann Surg 235:27–30

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Scatton O, Brustia R, Belli G, Pekolj J, Wakabayashi G, Gayet B (2015) What kind of energy devices should be used for laparoscopic liver resection? Recommendations from a systematic review. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22:327–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Poon R (2007) Current techniques of liver transection. HPB (Oxford) 9:166–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cai X (2018) Laparoscopic liver resection: the current status and the future. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 7:98

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Chenyang J, Hongyu L, Ningyuan W, Junhua C, Yonggang W (2018) Laparoscopic liver resection: a review of current indications and surgical techniques. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 7:277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Otsuka Y, Kaneko H, Cleary SP, Buell JF, Cai X, Wakabayashi G (2015) What is the best technique in parenchymal transection in laparoscopic liver resection? Comprehensive review for the clinical question on the 2nd International Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Liver Resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22:363–370

  7. Gorgen A, Goldaracena N, Zhang W, Rosales R, Ghanekar A, Lilly L, Cattral M, Greig P, McCluskey S, McGilvray I (2018) Surgical complications after right hepatectomy for live liver donation: largest single-center western world experience. Semin Liver Dis 38:134–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bodzin AS, Leiby BE, Ramirez CG, Frank AM, Doria C (2014) Liver resection using cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA) versus harmonic scalpel: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 12:500–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Scatton O, Vibert E (2018) Chirurgie hépatique par laparoscopie. Arnette, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  10. Soubrane O, Cherqui D, Scatton O, Stenard F, Bernard D, Branchereau S, Martelli H, Gauthier F (2006) Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy in living donors: safety and reproducibility of the technique in a single center. Ann Surg 244:815

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Choi G, Chung Y, Lee J, Gil E, Kim J, Kwon C, Joh J, Lee SJT (2018) Safety and risk factors of pure laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy: comparison to open technique in propensity matched analysis. Transplantation 102:128–128

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu F, Xu H, Li Q, Wei Y, Li H, Wang W, Wen T, Wu H, Yang J, Xu M (2019) Outcomes of pure laparoscopic Glissonian pedicle approach hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis. Surg Endosc 33:1155–1166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu F, Wei Y, Li H, Wang W, Wen T, Wu H, Yang J, Xu M, Li B (2018) LigaSure versus CUSA for parenchymal transection during laparoscopic hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with cirrhosis: a propensity score-matched analysis. Surg Endosc 32:2454–2465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Morise Z, Wakabayashi G (2017) First quarter century of laparoscopic liver resection. World J Gastroenterol 23:3581–3588

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoh T, Cauchy F, Soubrane O (2019) Techniques for laparoscopic liver parenchymal transection. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 8:572–581

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller D, Buell J, Kaneko H, Han H, Asbun H, O’Rourke N, Tanabe M, Lo C (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261:619

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Honda G, Ome Y, Yoshida N, Kawamoto Y (2020) How to dissect the liver parenchyma: excavation with cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 27:907–912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ntourakis D, Memeo R, Soler L, Marescaux J, Mutter D, Pessaux PJ (2016) Augmented reality guidance for the resection of missing colorectal liver metastases: an initial experience. World J Surg 40:419–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Msika S, Deroide G, Kianmanesh R, Iannelli A, Hay J-M, Fingerhut A, Flamant YJ (2001) Harmonic scalpel™ in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44:432–436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nomi T, Hokuto D, Yoshikawa T, Kamitani N, Matsuo Y, Sho M (2021) Clamp-crush technique for laparoscopic liver resection. Ann Surg Oncol 28:866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Martins PN, Theruvath TP, Neuhaus P (2008) Rodent models of partial hepatectomies. Liver Int 28:3–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jersenius U, Fors D, Rubertsson S, Arvidsson D (2007) Laparoscopic parenchymal division of the liver in a porcine model: comparison of the efficacy and safety of three different techniques. Surg Endosc 21:315–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yamamoto J, Nagai M, Smith B, Tamaki S, Kubota T, Sasaki K, Ohmori T, Maeda K (2006) Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy and devascularization of the upper stomach in the management of gastric varices. World J Surg 30:1520–1525

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Gagner M, Rogula T, Selzer D (2004) Laparoscopic liver resection: benefits and controversies. Surg Clin 84:451–462

    Google Scholar 

  25. Romano F, Garancini M, Uggeri F, Degrate L, Nespoli L, Gianotti L, Nespoli A, Uggeri F (2012) Bleeding in hepatic surgery: sorting through methods to prevent it. HPB Surg 2012:12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gotohda N, Yamanaka T, Saiura A, Uesaka K, Hashimoto M, Konishi M, Shimada K (2015) Impact of energy devices during liver parenchymal transection: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 39:1543–1549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cherqui D, Husson E, Hammoud R, Malassagne B, Stéphan F, Bensaid S, Rotman N, Fagniez P-L (2000) Laparoscopic liver resections: a feasibility study in 30 patients. Ann Surg 232:753

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao X, Lei Z, Gao F, Yang J, Xie Q, Jiang K, Jie G (2021) Minimally invasive versus open living donors right hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg (London, England) 95:106152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Erdogan D, Busch O, Van Delden O, Rauws E, Gouma D, Van Gulik T (2008) Incidence and management of bile leakage after partial liver resection. Dig Surg 25:60–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Appere F, Piardi T, Memeo R, Lardiere-Deguelte S, Chetboun M, Sommacale D, Pessaux P, Kianmanesh R (2017) Comparative study with propensity score matching analysis of two different methods of transection during hemi-right hepatectomy: ultracision harmonic scalpel versus Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator. Surg Innov 24:499–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lesurtel M, Selzner M, Petrowsky H, McCormack L, Clavien P-A (2005) How should transection of the liver be performed?: A prospective randomized study in 100 consecutive patients: comparing four different transection strategies. Ann Surg 242:814

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81602910, No. 81302344, and No. 81802095) and the Sichuan Science and Technology Program (No. 2019YFS0370, No. 2019YFS0372, and No.2022YFS0090).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YY: designed research/study, performed research/study, collected data, analyzed data, wrote the paper, edited the manuscript. YP and KC: collected data, analyzed data. BL and YGW: reviewed/edited the manuscript. FL: designed research/study, performed research/study, reviewed the manuscript, revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fei Liu.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Yubo Yang, Yufu Peng, Kefei Chen, YongGang Wei, Bo Li, Fei Liu have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the clinic trial ethics committee of West China hospital (NO.20211291).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (MP4 130706 kb)

Supplementary file2 (MP4 1296 kb)

Supplementary file3 (MP4 1239 kb)

Supplementary file4 (MP4 1428 kb)

Supplementary file5 (MP4 1756 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Y., Peng, Y., Chen, K. et al. Laparoscopic liver resection with “ultrasonic scalpel mimic CUSA" technique. Surg Endosc 36, 8927–8934 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09341-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09341-4

Keywords

Navigation