Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle biopsy in upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors measuring 2–5 cm in size

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Subepithelial tumors (SETs) in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract are frequently discovered during upper endoscopy, and their management is determined based on size and histopathological diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) in upper GI SETs of 2–5 cm in size.

Methods

We included 63 patients who underwent EUS-FNB for upper GI SETs of 2–5 cm in size between January 2013 and February 2020. The diagnostic yield of EUS-FNB, ability of EUS-FNB in discriminating malignant from non-malignant lesions, and histopathological concordance between EUS-FNB specimens and resected specimens were evaluated.

Results

Successful acquisition of macroscopic tissue cores was possible in all 63 cases, and the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNB was 92.1% (58/63). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-FNB in discriminating malignant from non-malignant lesions were 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] 85.3–100%), 87.8% (95% CI 79.9–87.8%), and 92.1% (95% CI 81.8–92.1%), respectively. Of the 26 SETs that were endoscopically or surgically resected after EUS-FNB, the histopathological concordance rate between the EUS-FNB specimens and resected specimens was 100% (24/24), except in two cases of inadequate results with EUS-FNB specimens.

Conclusion

EUS-FNB provides high diagnostic yield and high capability in discriminating malignant from non-malignant lesions in upper GI SETs of 2–5 cm in size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hwang JH, Rulyak SD, Kimmey MB (2006) American gastroenterological association institute technical review on the management of gastric subepithelial masses. Gastroenterology 130:2217–2228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Choe Y, Cho YK, Kim GH, Kim JH, Kim TH, Kim ES, Choi EK, Choi JH, Kim SH, Kim DH (2020) The prevalence, natural course, and clinical practice of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors in Korea. Gastrointest Endosc 91:AB321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cantor MJ, Davila RE, Faigel DO (2006) Yield of tissue sampling for subepithelial lesions evaluated by EUS: a comparison between forceps biopsies and endoscopic submucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc 64:29–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim GH (2021) Systematic endoscopic approach for diagnosing gastric subepithelial tumors. Gut Liver 16:19–27

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Facciorusso A, Sunny SP, Del Prete V, Antonino M, Muscatiello N (2020) Comparison between fine-needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration for EUS-guided sampling of subepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 91:14-22.e12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim GH, Cho YK, Kim EY, Kim HK, Cho JW, Lee TH, Moon JS (2014) Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided subepithelial tumor sampling. Scand J Gastroenterol 49:347–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee JH, Cho CJ, Park YS, Ahn JY, Kim DH, Na HK, Choi KD, Song HJ, Lee GH, Jung HY (2016) EUS-guided 22-gauge fine needle biopsy for the diagnosis of gastric subepithelial tumors larger than 2 cm. Scand J Gastroenterol 51:486–493

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nishida T, Blay J-Y, Hirota S, Kitagawa Y, Kang Y-K (2016) The standard diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on guidelines. Gastric Cancer 19:3–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nishida T, Kawai N, Yamaguchi S, Nishida Y (2013) Submucosal tumors: comprehensive guide for the diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Dig Endosc 25:479–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nishida T, Hirota S, Yanagisawa A, Sugino Y, Minami M, Yamamura Y, Otani Y, Shimada Y, Takahashi F, Kubota T (2008) Clinical practice guidelines for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in Japan: English version. Int J Clin Oncol 13:416–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Antonescu CR, DeMatteo RP, Ganjoo KN, Maki RG, Pisters PW, Raut CP, Riedel RF, Schuetze S, Sundar HM, Trent JC, Wayne JD (2010) NCCN Task Force report: update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 8(Suppl 2):S1–S41 (quiz S42–44)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. So H, Seo DW, Hwang JS, Ko SW, Oh D, Song TJ, Park DH, Lee SK, Kim MH (2021) Macroscopic on-site evaluation after EUS-guided fine needle biopsy may replace rapid on-site evaluation. Endosc Ultrasound 10:111–115

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Park J, Park JC, Jo JH, Kim EH, Shin SK, Lee SK, Lee YC (2019) Prospective comparative study of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle biopsy and unroofing biopsy. Dig Liver Dis 51:831–836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Iglesias-Garcia J, Poley JW, Larghi A, Giovannini M, Petrone MC, Abdulkader I, Monges G, Costamagna G, Arcidiacono P, Biermann K, Rindi G, Bories E, Dogloni C, Bruno M, Dominguez-Muñoz JE (2011) Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle: results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc 73:1189–1196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim GH, Ahn JY, Gong CS, Kim M, Na HK, Lee JH, Jung KW, Kim DH, Choi KD, Song HJ, Lee GH, Jung H-Y (2020) Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy in gastric subepithelial tumors located in the cardia. Dig Dis Sci 65:583–590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hedenström P, Marschall HU, Nilsson B, Demir A, Lindkvist B, Nilsson O, Sadik R (2018) High clinical impact and diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided biopsy sampling of subepithelial lesions: a prospective, comparative study. Surg Endosc 32:1304–1313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee M, Min BH, Lee H, Ahn S, Lee JH, Rhee PL, Kim JJ, Sohn TS, Kim S, Kim KM (2015) Feasibility and diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle biopsy with a new core biopsy needle device in patients with gastric subepithelial tumors. Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e1622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Inoue T, Okumura F, Sano H, Mizushima T, Tsukamoto H, Fujita Y, Ibusuki M, Kitano R, Kobayashi Y, Ishii N, Ito K, Yoneda M (2019) Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy on the diagnosis of subepithelial tumors: a propensity score-matching analysis. Dig Endosc 31:156–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sekine M, Miura T, Fujiwara J, Uehara T, Asano T, Matsumoto S, Miyatani H, Mashima H (2021) Utility of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for diagnosing small subepithelial lesions (< 20 mm). J Ultrasound 25:35–40

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kamata K, Kurita A, Yasukawa S, Chiba Y, Nebiki H, Asada M, Yasuda H, Shiomi H, Ogura T, Takaoka M, Hoki N, Ashida R, Shigekawa M, Yanagisawa A, Kudo M, Kitano M (2021) Utility of a 20G needle with a core trap in EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy for gastric submucosal tumors: a multicentric prospective trial. Endosc Ultrasound 10:134–140

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Polkowski M, Gerke W, Jarosz D, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A, Rutkowski P, Nowecki ZI, Ruka W, Regula J, Butruk E (2009) Diagnostic yield and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided trucut [corrected] biopsy in patients with gastric submucosal tumors: a prospective study. Endoscopy 41:329–334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. DeWitt J, Al-Haddad M, Fogel E, Sherman S, LeBlanc JK, McHenry L, Schmidt CM (2009) Endoscopic transduodenal drainage of an abscess arising after EUS-FNA of a duodenal GI stromal tumor. Gastrointest Endosc 70:185–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chong CCN, Lakhtakia S, Nguyen N, Hara K, Chan WK, Puri R, Almadi MA, Ang TL, Kwek A, Yasuda I, Doi S, Kida M, Wang HP, Cheng TY, Jiang Q, Yang A, Chan AWH, Chan S, Tang R, Iwashita T, Teoh AYB (2020) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with or without macroscopic on-site evaluation: randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 52:856–863

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Iwashita T, Yasuda I, Mukai T, Doi S, Nakashima M, Uemura S, Mabuchi M, Shimizu M, Hatano Y, Hara A, Moriwaki H (2015) Macroscopic on-site quality evaluation of biopsy specimens to improve the diagnostic accuracy during EUS-guided FNA using a 19-gauge needle for solid lesions: a single-center prospective pilot study (MOSE study). Gastrointest Endosc 81:177–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GHK: conception and design of this work; DCJ and GHK: acquisition and interpretation of data, drafting this work; MWL, BEL, DHB, and GAS revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors approve the manuscript in its current form for publication and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gwang Ha Kim.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dong Chan Joo, Gwang Ha Kim, Moon Won Lee, Bong Eun Lee, Dong Hoon Baek, Geun Am Song have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joo, D.C., Kim, G.H., Lee, M.W. et al. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle biopsy in upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors measuring 2–5 cm in size. Surg Endosc 36, 8060–8066 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09243-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09243-5

Keywords

Navigation