Abstract
Background
Revisional surgery is technically demanding and is usually associated with higher intraoperative and perioperative risks than primary procedures. The objective of this study is to compare outcomes of patients who had gastric bypass procedures performed as a rescue procedure for failed gastric banding, with those who had a primary gastric bypass.
Materials and methods
The group of patients undergoing revisional gastric bypass for failed gastric band was matched in a 1:2 ratio with control patients who underwent a primary RYGB, based on gender, score, preoperative body mass index, and comorbidities. Data were retrospectively retrieved.
Results
Thirty one (33.3%) patients underwent band removal and gastric bypass (group A) and 62 (66.6%) only primary gastric bypass (group B). Nonsignificant differences were seen in operative time, operative bleeding, or length of stay. Complications were more frequent in group A. Postoperative weight at 12-month follow-up was greater in group A, however, not statistically significant. Changes in weight, both absolute, and percentage were not different between groups. This observation was also true for BMI, in which no significant differences were seen. Overall, mean follow-up was 16 ± 3.2 months.
Conclusion
Gastric bypass can be performed as revisional bariatric surgery, with low complication rates and acceptable outcomes, though not with the same safety as a primary procedure. Gastric bypass is a satisfactory option for patients with a failed gastric band.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mognol P, Chosidow D, Marmuse J (2004) Laparoscopic conversion of laparoscopic gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a review of 70 patients. Obes Surg 14:1349–1353
Moon RC, Teixeira AF, Jawad MA (2013) Conversion of failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass? Surg Obes Relat Dis 9:901–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2013.04.003
Van WB, Berends FJ, Van RB, Janssen IFM (2006) Revision of failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 16:137–141
Angrisani L, Vitiello A, De LM, Iovino P (2016) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy as revisional procedures after adjustable gastric band: 5-year outcomes. Obes Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2502-8
Dang JT, Switzer NJ, Wu J, Gill RS, Shi X, Thereaux J et al (2016) Gastric band removal in revisional bariatric surgery, one-step versus two-step: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg 26:4–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2082-7
Pędziwiatr M, Małczak P, Wierdak M, Rubinkiewicz M, Pisarska M, Major P et al (2018) Revisional gastric bypass is inferior to primary gastric bypass in terms of short-and long-term outcomes—systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg 28:2083–2091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3300-2
Weber M, Müller MK, Michel JM, Belal R, Horber F, Hauser R et al (2003) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, but not rebanding, should be proposed as rescue procedure for patients with failed laparoscopic gastric banding. Ann Surg 238:827–834. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000098623.53293.bb
Worni M, Østbye T, Shah A, Carvalho E, Schudel IM, Shin JH et al (2013) High risks for adverse outcomes after gastric bypass surgery following failed gastric banding: a population-based trend analysis of the United States. Ann Surg 257:279–286. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182683037
Fournier P, Gero D, Dayer-jankechova A et al (2015) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for failed gastric banding: outcomes in 642 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2015.04.007
Jones KB (2001) Revisional bariatric surgery—safe and effective. Obes Surg 11:183–189. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089201321577857
Nesset EM, Kendrick ML, Houghton SG, Mai JL, Thompson GB, Que FG et al (2007) A two-decade spectrum of revisional bariatric surgery at a tertiary referral center. Surg Obes Relat Dis 3:25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2006.10.010
Behrns KE, Smith CD, Kelly KA, Sarr MG (1993) Reoperative bariatric surgery. Lessons learned to improve patient selection and results. Ann Surg 218:646–653. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199321850-00010
Hallowell PT, Stellato TA, Yao DA, Robinson A, Schuster MM, Graf KN (2009) Should bariatric revisional surgery be avoided secondary to increased morbidity and mortality? Am J Surg 197:391–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.11.011
Sanchez H, Cabrera A, Cabrera K, Zerrweck C, Mosti M, Sierra M et al (2008) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as a revision procedure after restrictive bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 18:1539–1543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-008-9655-z
Calmes JM, Giusti V, Suter M (2005) Reoperative laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an experience with 49 cases. Obes Surg 15:316–322. https://doi.org/10.1381/0960892053576785
Cohen R, Pinheiro JS, Correa JL, Schiavon C (2005) Laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery: myths and facts. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 19:822–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8826-9
Sugerman HJ, Wolper JL (1984) Failed gastroplasty for morbid obesity. Revised gastroplasty versus Roux-Y gastric bypass. Am J Surg 148:331–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(84)90465-3
Van Gemert WG, Van Wersch MM, Greve JWM, Soeters PB (1998) Revisional surgery after failed vertical banded gastroplasty: restoration of vertical banded gastroplasty or conversion to gastric bypass. Obes Surg 8:21–28. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089298765555006
Westling A, Margareta O, Gustavsson S (2003) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after previous unsuccessful gastric restrictive surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 7:429–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(02)00082-3
Gagner M, Gentileschi P, De Csepel J, Kini S, Patterson E, Inabnet WB et al (2002) Laparoscopic reoperative bariatric surgery: experience from 27 consecutive patients. Obes Surg 12:254–260. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089202762552737
Radtka JF, Puleo FJ, Wang L, Cooney RN (2010) Revisional bariatric surgery: who, what, where, and when? Surg Obes Relat Dis 6:635–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2010.04.005
Van Nieuwenhove Y, Ceelen W, Stockman A, Vanommeslaeghe H, Snoeck E, Van Renterghem K et al (2011) Long-term results of a prospective study on laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity. Obes Surg 21:582–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-010-0341-6
Obeid NR, Schwack BF, Kurian MS, Ren-Fielding CJ, Fielding GA (2014) Single-stage versus 2-stage sleeve gastrectomy as a conversion after failed adjustable gastric banding: 30-day outcomes. Surg Endosc 28:3186–3192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3585-8
Schäfer A, Gehwolf P, Umlauft J, Dziodzio T, Biebl M, Perathoner A et al (2018) Revisional gastric bypass after failed adjustable gastric banding—one-stage or two-stage procedure? Obes Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3614-0
Acknowledgements
None.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sector.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosure
Mauricio Gonzalez-Urquijo, David Eugenio Hinojosa Gonzalez, Ale Alam Gibram Gidi, Sofia Hurtado Arellano, Eduardo Flores-Villalba, and Javier Rojas Mendez have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclosure.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this case series. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal on request.
Research involving animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gonzalez-Urquijo, M., Hinojosa-Gonzalez, D.E., Gidi, A.G.A. et al. Revisional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after failed gastric banding: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc 36, 4815–4820 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08825-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08825-z