Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treating gallstones and common bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (LC-IntraERCP) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LC-LCBDE) to determine which one-stage therapeutic strategy provides better outcomes for patients with gallstones and common bile duct stones.

Methods

Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify eligible articles from the database inception to September 2020. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tools for randomized trials (RoB-2) and non-randomized interventions (ROBINS-I) was used to assess the quality of the included studies. The overall quality of evidence was assessed through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. The primary outcomes consisted of surgical success, retained stones, and overall postoperative complications, while secondary outcomes included postoperative bleeding, postoperative pancreatitis, postoperative bile leakage, conversion to laparotomy, and operative time.

Results

Eight studies (four RCTs and four Non-RCTs with high quality) with 2948 patients were included. No significant difference was seen between the two groups regarding surgical success, overall postoperative complications, conversion to laparotomy, and operative time. The meta-analysis demonstrated that in the LC-IntraERCP group, the rate of retained stones (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28–0.91) and postoperative bile leakage were lower (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.09–0.69), while in the LC-LCBDE group, postoperative bleeding (OR 5.24, 95% CI 1.65–16.65) and postoperative pancreatitis (OR 4.80, 95% CI 2.35–9.78) decreased.

Conclusions

LC-IntraERCP and LC-LCBDE exhibited similar efficacies when surgical success rate, overall postoperative complications, conversion to laparotomy, and operative time were compared. However, LC-IntraERCP is probably to be more effective in terms of lowering the rate of retained stones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Collins C, Maguire D, Ireland A, Fitzgerald E, O’Sullivan GC (2004) A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Ann Surg 239:28–33

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Borzellino G, Rodella L, Saladino E, Catalano F, Politi L, Minicozzi A, Cordiano C (2010) Treatment for retained [corrected] common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the rendezvous technique. Arch Surg 145:1145–1149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tan C, Ocampo O, Ong R, Tan KS (2018) Comparison of one stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with intra-operative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus two-stage pre-operative endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of pre-operatively diagnosed patients with common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 32:770–778

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Manes G, Paspatis G, Aabakken L, Anderloni A, Arvanitakis M, Ah-Soune P, Barthet M, Domagk D, Dumonceau JM, Gigot JF, Hritz I, Karamanolis G, Laghi A, Mariani A, Paraskeva K, Pohl J, Ponchon T, Swahn F, Ter Steege RWF, Tringali A, Vezakis A, Williams EJ, van Hooft JE (2019) Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 51:472–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) (2016) Electronic address: easloffice@easloffice.eu. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of gallstones. J Hepatol 65:146–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. García-Cano J, Domper F (2019) The best approach to treat concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones. Is ERCP still needed? Rev Esp Enferm Dig 111:173–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sanford DE (2019) An update on technical aspects of cholecystectomy. Surg Clin N Am 99:245–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kawai K, Akasaka Y, Murakami K, Tada M, Koli Y (1974) Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the ampulla of Vater. Gastrointest Endosc 20:148–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin Y, Su Y, Yan J, Li X (2020) Laparoendoscopic rendezvous versus ERCP followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 34:4214–4224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Arezzo A, Vettoretto N, Famiglietti F, Moja L, Morino M (2013) Laparoendoscopic rendezvous reduces perioperative morbidity and risk of pancreatitis. Surg Endosc 27:1055–1060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Muhammedoğlu B (2019) Single-stage treatment with ERCP and laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus two-stage treatment with ERCP followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy within six to eight weeks: a retrospective study. Turk J Surg 35:178–184

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh AN, Kilambi R (2018) Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials with trial sequential analysis. Surg Endosc 32:3763–3776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gurusamy K, Wilson E, Burroughs AK, Davidson BR (2012) Intra-operative vs pre-operative endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder and common bile duct stones: cost-utility and value-of-information analysis. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 10:15–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Williams E, Beckingham I, El Sayed G, Gurusamy K, Sturgess R, Webster G, Young T (2017) Updated guideline on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut 66:765–782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Di Lascia A, Tartaglia N, Pavone G, Pacilli M, Ambrosi A, Buccino RV, Petruzzelli F, Menga MR, Fersini A, Maddalena F (2021) One-step versus two-step procedure for management procedures for management of concurrent gallbladder and common bile duct stones. Outcomes and cost analysis. Ann Ital Chir 10

  16. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Buxbaum JL, Abbas Fehmi SM, Sultan S, Fishman DS, Qumseya BJ, Cortessis VK, Schilperoort H, Kysh L, Matsuoka L, Yachimski P, Agrawal D, Gurudu SR, Jamil LH, Jue TL, Khashab MA, Law JK, Lee JK, Naveed M, Sawhney MS, Thosani N, Yang J, Wani SB (2019) ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 89:1075–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ricci C, Pagano N, Taffurelli G, Pacilio CA, Migliori M, Bazzoli F, Casadei R, Minni F (2018) Comparison of efficacy and safety of 4 combinations of laparoscopic and intraoperative techniques for management of gallstone disease with biliary duct calculi: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. JAMA Surg 153:181167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ge L, Tian JH, Li YN, Pan JX, Li G, Wei D, Xing X, Pan B, Chen YL, Song FJ, Yang KH (2018) Association between prospective registration and overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study. J Clin Epidemiol 93:45–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Li J, Gao W, Punja S, Ma B, Vohra S, Duan N, Gabler N, Yang K, Kravitz RL (2016) Reporting quality of N-of-1 trials published between 1985 and 2013: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 76:57–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, Cates CJ, Cheng HY, Corbett MS, Eldridge SM, Emberson JR, Hernán MA, Hopewell S, Hróbjartsson A, Junqueira DR, Jüni P, Kirkham JJ, Lasserson T, Li T, McAleenan A, Reeves BC, Shepperd S, Shrier I, Stewart LA, Tilling K, White IR, Whiting PF, Higgins JPT (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366:l4898

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, Henry D, Altman DG, Ansari MT, Boutron I, Carpenter JR, Chan AW, Churchill R, Deeks JJ, Hróbjartsson A, Kirkham J, Jüni P, Loke YK, Pigott TD, Ramsay CR, Regidor D, Rothstein HR, Sandhu L, Santaguida PL, Schünemann HJ, Shea B, Shrier I, Tugwell P, Turner L, Valentine JC, Waddington H, Waters E, Wells GA, Whiting PF, Higgins JP (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 355:4919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539–1558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hong DF, Xin Y, Chen DW (2006) Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct for cholecystocholedocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 20:424–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Barreras González JE, Torres Peña R, Ruiz Torres J, Martínez Alfonso MÁ, Brizuela Quintanilla R, Morera Pérez M (2016) Endoscopic versus laparoscopic treatment for choledocholithiasis: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Endosc Int Open 4:E1188–E1193

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. ElGeidie AA, ElShobary MM, Naeem YM (2011) Laparoscopic exploration versus intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones: a prospective randomized trial. Dig Surg 28:424–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Poh BR, Ho SP, Sritharan M, Yeong CC, Swan MP, Devonshire DA, Cashin PA, Croagh DG (2016) Randomized clinical trial of intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus laparoscopic bile duct exploration in patients with choledocholithiasis. Br J Surg 103:1117–1124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu J, Xu X, Liu H, Li G (2013) Combined endoscopic-laparoscopic techniques for one-stage treatment of concomitant cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 33:1656–1660

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu S, Fang C, Tan J, Chen W (2020) A Comparison of the relative safety and efficacy of laparoscopic choledochotomy with primary closure and endoscopic treatment for bile duct stones in patients with cholelithiasis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 30:742–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wei Q, Wang JG, Li LB, Li JD (2003) Management of choledocholithiasis: comparison between laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy. World J Gastroenterol 9:2856–2858

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Vakayil V, Klinker ST, Sulciner ML, Mallick R, Trikudanathan G, Amateau SK, Davido HT, Freeman M, Harmon JV (2020) Single-stage management of choledocholithiasis: intraoperative ERCP versus laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 34:4616–4625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Noel R, Arnelo U, Swahn F (2019) Intraoperative versus postoperative rendezvous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography to treat common bile duct stones during cholecystectomy. Dig Endosc 31:69–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. La Barba G, Gardini A, Cavargini E, Casadei A, Morgagni P, Bazzocchi F, D’Acapito F, Cavaliere D, Curti R, Tringali D, Cucchetti A, Ercolani G (2018) Laparoendoscopic rendezvous in the treatment of cholecysto-choledocholitiasis: a single series of 200 patients. Surg Endosc 32:3868–3873

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Puhalla H, Flint N, O’Rourke N (2015) Surgery for common bile duct stones–a lost surgical skill; still worthwhile in the minimally invasive century? Langenbecks Arch Surg 400:119–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Itoi T, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Shinohara Y, Moriyasu F, Tsuchida A (2010) Evaluation of residual bile duct stones by peroral cholangioscopy in comparison with balloon-cholangiography. Dig Endosc 22:S85–S89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ahmad DS, Faulx A (2020) Management of postcholecystectomy biliary complications: a narrative review. Am J Gastroenterol 115:1191–1198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Fujita A, Nakahara K, Michikawa Y, Morita R, Suetani K, Sato J, Igarashi Y, Araki R, Ikeda H, Matsunaga K, Watanabe T, Itoh F (2020) Pancreatic duct guidewire placement for biliary cannulation as a risk factor for stone residue after endoscopic transpapillary stone removal. BMC Gastroenterol 20:285

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Ballou J, Wang Y, Schreiber M, Kiraly L (2019) 10 years of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: A single tertiary institution experience. Am J Surg 217:970–973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. García-Cano J, Arana LT, Ayllón CJ, Chicano MV, Fernández RM, Sánchez LS, Ruiz CJ, Ariño MJ, García JI, Vigara MG, Cerezo ER, Sola AP (2009) Biliary sphincterotomy dilation for the extraction of difficult common bile duct stones. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 101:541–545

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Schreuder AM, Busch OR, Besselink MG, Ignatavicius P, Gulbinas A, Barauskas G, Gouma DJ, van Gulik TM (2020) Long-term impact of iatrogenic bile duct injury. Dig Surg 37:10–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chandrasekhara V, Khashab MA, Muthusamy VR, Acosta RD, Agrawal D, Bruining DH, Eloubeidi MA, Fanelli RD, Faulx AL, Gurudu SR, Kothari S, Lightdale JR, Qumseya BJ, Shaukat A, Wang A, Wani SB, Yang J, DeWitt JM (2017) Adverse events associated with ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 85:32–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Tranter SE, Thompson MH (2002) Comparison of endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Br J Surg 89:1495–1504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Dumonceau JM, Kapral C, Aabakken L, Papanikolaou IS, Tringali A, Vanbiervliet G, Beyna T, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Hritz I, Mariani A, Paspatis G, Radaelli F, Lakhtakia S, Veitch AM, van Hooft JE (2020) ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 52:127–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lee HJ, Cho CM, Heo J, Jung MK, Kim TN, Kim KH, Kim H, Cho KB, Kim HG, Han J, Lee DW, Lee YS (2020) Impact of hospital volume and the experience of endoscopist on adverse events related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective observational study. Gut Liver 14:257–264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Testoni PA, Mariani A, Giussani A, Vailati C, Masci E, Macarri G, Ghezzo L, Familiari L, Giardullo N, Mutignani M, Lombardi G, Talamini G, Spadaccini A, Briglia R, Piazzi L; SEIFRED Group (2010) Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in high- and low-volume centers and among expert and non-expert operators: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 105:1753–1761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, Niro G, Valvano MR, Spirito F, Pilotto A, Forlano R (2007) Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 102:1781–1788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kochar B, Akshintala VS, Afghani E, Elmunzer BJ, Kim KJ, Lennon AM, Khashab MA, Kalloo AN, Singh VK (2015) Incidence, severity, and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review by using randomized, controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 81:143–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Reinders JS, Gouma DJ, Ubbink DT, van Ramshorst B, Boerma D (2014) Transcystic or transductal stone extraction during single-stage treatment of choledochocystolithiasis: a systematic review. World J Surg 38:2403–2411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Sarma DR, Balakrishnan S, Eltair M, Mankotia R, Budhoo M, Kumar Y (2019) Laparoscopic transcystic versus transductal common bile duct exploration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 43:1935–1948

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhou Y, Wu XD, Zha WZ, Fan RG, Zhang B, Xu YH, Qin CL, Jia J (2017) Three modalities on common bile duct exploration. Z Gastroenterol 55:856–860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Bekheit M, Smith R, Ramsay G, Soggiu F, Ghazanfar M, Ahmed I (2019) Meta-analysis of laparoscopic transcystic versus transcholedochal common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. BJS Open 3:242–251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Navarro-Sánchez A, Ashrafian H, Segura-Sampedro JJ, Martrinez-Isla A (2017) LABEL procedure: Laser-assisted bile duct exploration by laparoendoscopy for choledocholithiasis: improving surgical outcomes and reducing technical failure. Surg Endosc 31:2103–2108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Navaratne L, Martinez IA (2021) Transductal versus transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: an institutional review of over four hundred cases. Surg Endosc 35:437–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Lei J, Wang J, Li Q, Wu P, Yuan R, Zhu H, Zou S, Shao J, Fang L (2016) Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration: T-Shaped incision of cystic duct with FREDDY laser lithotripsy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26:646–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Qandeel H, Zino S, Hanif Z, Nassar MK, Nassar AH (2016) Basket-in-catheter access for transcystic laparoscopic bile duct exploration: technique and results. Surg Endosc 30:1958–1964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Wenner DE, Whitwam P, Rosser J, Hashmi S, Wenner DE 3rd (2005) A stone extraction facilitation device to achieve an improved technique for performing LCBDE. Surg Endosc 19:120–125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Syrén EL, Enochsson L, Eriksson S, Eklund A, Isaksson B, Sandblom G (2021) Cardiovascular complications after common bile duct stone extractions. Surg Endosc 35:3296–3302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Matsui Y, Hirooka S, Yamaki S, Kotsuka M, Kosaka H, Yamamoto T, Satoi S (2019) Assessment of clinical outcome of cholecystectomy according to age in preparation for the “Silver Tsunami.” Am J Surg 218:567–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Bergman S, Sourial N, Vedel I, Hanna WC, Fraser SA, Newman D, Bilek AJ, Galatas C, Marek JE, Monette J (2011) Gallstone disease in the elderly: are older patients managed differently? Surg Endosc 25:55–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Kamarajah SK, Karri S, Bundred JR, Evans RPT, Lin A, Kew T, Ekeozor C, Powell SL, Singh P, Griffiths EA (2020) Perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 34:4727–4740

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Wu X, Huang ZJ, Zhong JY, Ran YH, Ma ML, Zhang HW (2019) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure is safe for management of choledocholithiasis in elderly patients. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 18:557–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Parra-Membrives P, Martínez-Baena D, Lorente-Herce JM, Jiménez-Vega J (2014) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in elderly patients: is there still a difference? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24:e118–e122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Liu WS, Jiang Y, Zhang D, Shi LQ, Sun DL (2018) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is a safe and effective strategy for elderly patients. Surg Innov 25:465–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Zhou Y, Zha WZ, Fan RG, Jiang GQ, Wu XD (2019) Two-stage versus single-stage procedure for the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis in elderly patients: a retrospectively cohort study. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 111:176–181

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the institution (Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University) for their contribution toward the statistical study design and study data analysis.

Funding

This study was supported by the Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics and Precision Medicine for Surgical Oncology in Gansu Province (Grant No. 2019GSZDSYS06), Gansu Province Science & Technology support program of Science and Technology department of Gansu Province (Grant No. 144FKCA073), and the Key Laboratory of Evidence-Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation Foundation of Gansu Province (Grant No. GSEBMKT-2021KFJJ001).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Caining Lei, Tingting Lu, and Wenwen Yang are co-first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The First Clinical Medicine College, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, China

    Caining Lei & Tiankang Guo

  2. Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, China

    Caining Lei, Wenwen Yang, Hongwei Tian, Shaoming Song, Shiyi Gong, Jia Yang & Tiankang Guo

  3. Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China

    Caining Lei, Tingting Lu & Kehu Yang

  4. Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, 730000, China

    Tingting Lu & Kehu Yang

  5. Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, China

    Tingting Lu

  6. The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China

    Wenwen Yang & Shaoming Song

  7. The Affiliated Cancer Hosptial School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610000, China

    Man Yang

  8. Key Laboratory of Surgical Tumor Molecular Diagnosis and Precision Therapy in Gansu Province, Lanzhou, 730000, China

    Hongwei Tian & Tiankang Guo

  9. Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, China

    Wenjie Jiang

Authors
  1. Caining Lei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tingting Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wenwen Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Man Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hongwei Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shaoming Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shiyi Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jia Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Wenjie Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Kehu Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Tiankang Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

TG, KY: conception and design of this work; CL, TL, and WY: acquisition and interpretation of data, drafting this work; CL, MY, HT, SS, SG, JY, and WJ revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors approve the manuscript in its current form for publication and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kehu Yang or Tiankang Guo.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Caining Lei, Tingting Lu, Wenwen Yang, Man Yang, Hongwei Tian, Shaoming Song, Shiyi Gong, Jia Yang, Wenjie Jiang, Kehu Yang, and Tiankang Guo have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lei, C., Lu, T., Yang, W. et al. Comparison of intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treating gallstones and common bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 35, 5918–5935 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08648-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08648-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation