Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of a progressive algorithmic approach for the treatment of unresectable colon polyps using colon conservation techniques

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The majority of endoscopically unresectable colon polyps (EUCP) are treated by segmental colectomy. However, up to 90% of EUCP do not harbor malignancy, making colectomy an unnecessary procedure. To minimize unnecessary segmental colectomy, we established a progressive treatment algorithm utilizing colon conservation techniques (CCT). In our progressive CCT algorithm, patients with EUCP first underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). If unsuccessful, they progressed to combined endo-laparoscopic surgery (CELS) and ultimately to segmental colectomy, if necessary.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients treated by our progressive CCT algorithm from August 2015 to April 2019. Demographic information, polyp characteristics, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. We also compared the outcomes of our CCT algorithm group to 156 patients undergoing segmental colectomy for EUCP at related institutions from August 2015 to August 2018.

Results

A total of 102 EUCP in 97 patients were treated with our progressive CCT algorithm. Of these, 76 of 102 (75.5%) EUCP were removed without requiring segmental colectomy, with 42 EUCP removed via ESD and 34 via CELS. Interval surveillance colonoscopy confirmed that 72 of 97 (74.2%) patients with EUCP treated by CCT completely avoided segmental colectomy. Polyps > 5 cm in size was a significant predictor of CCT failure (OR 3.83, P = 0.03). When compared to an external cohort of patients undergoing segmental colectomy for EUCP, the CCT algorithm was associated with longer operative time, but shorter length of stay, with no difference in postoperative complications. The estimated total healthcare cost of the CCT algorithm was lower than segmental colectomy ($10,956.77 versus $16,692.94), with more dramatic cost savings seen in ESD ($4,492.70) and CELS ($8,507.06).

Conclusions

An established progressive CCT algorithm can result in high colon conservation rate and decrease associated health care costs compared to segmental colectomy. It is a reasonable treatment strategy for patients with EUCP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gallegos-Orozco JF, Gurudu SR (2010) Complex colon polypectomy. Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:375–382

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burgess NG, Hourigan LF, Zanati SA, Brown GJ, Singh R, Williams SJ, Raftopoulos SC, Ormonde D, Moss A, Byth K, Mahajan H, McLeod D, Bourke MJ (2017) Risk stratification for covert invasive cancer among patients referred for colonic endoscopic mucosal resection: a large multicenter cohort. Gastroenterology 153:732-742.e1. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vu JV, Sheetz KH, De Roo AC, Hiatt T, Hendren S (2020) Variation in colectomy rates for benign polyp and colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07451-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bertelson NL, Kalkbrenner KA, Merchea A, Dozois EJ, Landmann RG, De Petris G, Young-Fadok TM, Etzioni DA (2012) Colectomy for endoscopically unresectable polyps: How often is it cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 55:1111–1116. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182695115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Longo WE, Virgo KS, Johnson FE, Oprian CA, Vernava AM, Wade TP, Phelan MA, Henderson WG, Daley J, Khuri SF (2000) Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 43:83–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101510100023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Alves A, Panis Y, Mathieu P, Mantion G, Kwiatkowski F, Slim K (2005) Postoperative mortality and morbidity in French patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 140:278–283. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.140.3.284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohan JN, Donahue C, Pantel HJ, Ricciardi R, Kleiman DA, Read TE, Marcello PW (2020) Endoscopic step up: a colon sparing alternative to colectomy to improve outcomes and reduce costs for patients with advanced neoplastic polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 63:842–849. https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0000000000001645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lascarides C, Buscaglia JM, Denoya PI, Nagula S, Bucobo JC, Bergamaschi R (2016) Laparoscopic right colectomy vs laparoscopic-assisted colonoscopic polypectomy for endoscopically unresectable polyps: a randomized controlled trial. Color Dis 18:1050–1056. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2020) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Colon Cancer. (Versions 2.2020). https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/colon.pdf. Accessed 4 April 2020.

  10. Jayaram A, Barr N, Plummer R, Yao M, Chen L, Yoo J (2019) Combined endo-laparoscopic surgery (CELS) for benign colon polyps: a single institution cost analysis. Surg Endosc 33:3238–3242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06610-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gamaleldin M, Benlice C, Delaney CP, Steele S, Gorgun E (2018) Management of the colorectal polyp referred for resection: a case-matched comparison of advanced endoscopic surgery and laparoscopic colectomy. Surgery 163:522–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.10.057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Saito Y, Uraoka T, Matsuda T, Emura F, Ikehara H, Mashimo Y, Kikuchi T, Fu KI, Sano Y, Saito D (2007) Endoscopic treatment of large superficial colorectal tumors: a case series of 200 endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 66:966–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2007.02.053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y, Hotta K, Sakamoto N, Ikematsu H, Fukuzawa M, Kobayashi N, Nasu J, Michida T, Yoshida S, Ikehara H, Otake Y, Nakajima T, Matsuda T, Saito D (2010) A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 72:1217–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakamura F, Saito Y, Sakamoto T, Otake Y, Nakajima T, Yamamoto S, Murakami Y, Ishikawa H, Matsuda T (2015) Potential perioperative advantage of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection versus laparoscopy-assisted colectomy. Surg Endosc 29:596–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3705-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilhelm D, Von Delius S, Weber L, Meining A, Schneider A, Friess H, Schmid RM, Frimberger E, Feussner H (2009) Combined laparoscopic-endoscopic resections of colorectal polyps: 10-Year experience and follow-up. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 23:688–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0282-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Franklin ME, Díaz-E JA, Abrego D, Parra-Dávila E, Glass JL (2000) Laparoscopic-assisted colonoscopic polypectomy: the Texas endosurgery institute experience. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1246–1249. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Longcroft-Wheaton G, Duku M, Mead R, Basford P, Bhandari P (2013) Risk stratification system for evaluation of complex polyps can predict outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 56:960–966. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e31829193e0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Law R, Das A, Gregory D, Komanduri S, Muthusamy R, Rastogi A, Varge J, Wallace MB, Raju GS, Mounzer R, Klapman J, Shah J, Watson R, Wilson R, Edmundowicz SA, Wani S (2016) Endoscopic resection is cost-effective compared with laparoscopic resection in the management of complex colon polyps: an economic analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 83:1248–1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Carmichael JC, Keller DS, Baldini G, Bordeianou L, Weiss E, Lee L, Boutros M, McClane J, Feldman LS, Steele SR (2017) Clinical practice Guidelines for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 60:761–784. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000883

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Childers CP, Maggard-Gibbons M (2018) Understanding costs of care in the operating room. JAMA Surg. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.6233

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaiser Family Foundation (2020) Hospital Adjusted Expenses per Inpatient Day. https://www.kff.org/health-costs/state-indicator/expenses-per-inpatient-day/?currentTimeframe=0&selectedRows=%7B%22wrapups%22:%7B%22united-states%22:%7B%7D%7D%7D&sortModel=%7B%22colId%22:%22Location%22,%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D. Accessed 4 April 2020.

  22. Gorgun E, Benlice C, Abbas MA, Steele S (2018) Experience in colon sparing surgery in North America: advanced endoscopic approaches for complex colorectal lesions. Surg Endosc 32:3114–3121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6026-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Crawshaw BP, Chien HL, Augestad KM, Delaney CP (2015) Effect of laparoscopic surgery on health care utilization and costs in patients who undergo colectomy. JAMA Surg 150:410–415. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2014.3171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yan J, Trencheva K, Lee SW, Sonoda T, Shukla P, Milsom JW (2011) Treatment for right colon polyps not removable using standard colonoscopy: combined laparoscopic-colonoscopic approach. Dis Colon Rectum 54:753–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3182108289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tanaka S, Oka S, Kaneko I, Hirata M, Mouri R, Kanao H, Yoshida S, Chayama K (2007) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: possibility of standardization. Gastrointest Endosc 66:100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2007.02.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee SW, Garrett KA, Shin JH, Trencheva K, Sonoda T, Milsom JW (2013) Dynamic article: long-term outcomes of patients undergoing combined endolaparoscopic surgery for benign colon polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 56:869–873. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182821e58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee EJ, Lee JB, Lee SH, Kim DS, Lee DH, Lee DS, Youk EG (2013) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors—1,000 colorectal ESD cases: one specialized institute’s experiences. Surg Endosc 27:31–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2403-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Voloyiannis T, Snyder MJ, Bailey RR, Pidala M (2008) Management of the difficult colon polyp referred for resection: resect or rescope? Dis Colon Rectum 51:292–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9175-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Loungnarath R, Mutch MG, Birnbaum EH, Read TE, Fleshman JW (2010) Laparoscopic colectomy using cancer principles is appropriate for colonoscopically unresectable adenomas of the colon. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1017–1022. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181df0b8f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beiqun Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Zhao, Roper, Klaristenfeld, and Tomassi have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, B., Roper, M.T., Klaristenfeld, D.D. et al. Evaluation of a progressive algorithmic approach for the treatment of unresectable colon polyps using colon conservation techniques. Surg Endosc 35, 6633–6642 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08163-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08163-6

Keywords

Navigation