Skip to main content
Log in

Surgical navigation system for laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in rectal cancer surgery using laparoscopic-vision-tracked ultrasonic imaging

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) in rectal cancer surgery requires considerable skill because the pelvic arteries, which need to be located to guide the dissection, are covered by other tissues and cannot be observed on laparoscopic views. Therefore, surgeons need to localize the pelvic arteries accurately before dissection, to prevent injury to these arteries.

Methods

This report proposes a surgical navigation system to facilitate artery localization in laparoscopic LPLND by combining ultrasonic imaging and laparoscopy. Specifically, free-hand laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) is employed to capture the arteries intraoperatively in this approach, and a laparoscopic vision-based tracking system is utilized to track the LUS probe. To extract the artery contours from the two-dimensional ultrasound image sequences efficiently, an artery extraction framework based on local phase-based snakes was developed. After reconstructing the three-dimensional intraoperative artery model from ultrasound images, a high-resolution artery model segmented from preoperative computed tomography (CT) images was rigidly registered to the intraoperative artery model and overlaid onto the laparoscopic view to guide laparoscopic LPLND.

Results

Experiments were conducted to evaluate the performance of the vision-based tracking system, and the average reconstruction error of the proposed tracking system was found to be 2.4 mm. Then, the proposed navigation system was quantitatively evaluated on an artery phantom. The reconstruction time and average navigation error were 8 min and 2.3 mm, respectively. A navigation system was also successfully constructed to localize the pelvic arteries in laparoscopic and open surgeries of a swine. This demonstrated the feasibility of the proposed system in vivo. The construction times in the laparoscopic and open surgeries were 14 and 12 min, respectively.

Conclusions

The experimental results showed that the proposed navigation system can guide laparoscopic LPLND and requires a significantly shorter setting time than the state-of-the-art navigation systems do.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cancer Registry and Statistics (2012) Cancer information service. National Cancer Center, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  2. Watanabe T, Itabashi M, Shimada Y, Tanaka S, Ito Y, Ajioka Y, Ishihara S (2015) Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) Guidelines 2014 for treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 20(2):207–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nakamura T, Watanabe M (2013) Lateral lymph node dissection for lower rectal cancer. World J Surg 37(8):1808–1813

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sadahiro S, Suzuki T, Ishikawa K, Nakamura T, Tanaka Y, Masuda T, Murayama C (2003) Recurrence patterns after curative resection of colorectal cancer in patients followed for a minimum of ten years. Hepatogastroenterology 50(53):1362–1366

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, Chang HJ, Lee HS, Kim SY, Jung KH, Hong YS, Kim JH, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Oh JH (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11(7):637–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tonutti M, Elson DS, Yang GZ, Darzi AW, Sodergren MH (2016) The role of technology in minimally invasive surgery: state of the art, recent developments, and future directions. Postgrad Med J 93(1097):159–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Larach S (2015) Image-guided real-time navigation for transanal total mesorectal excision: a pilot study. Tech Coloproctol 19(11):679–684

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Atallah S, Larach SW, Monson JR (2016) Stereotactic navigation for TAMIS-TME. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 25(5):271–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Koivukangas T, Katisko JP, Koivukangas JP (2013) Technical accuracy of optical and electromagnetic tracking systems. SpringerPlus 2(1):90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nijkampa J, Kuhlmanna K, Sonkeb JJ, Ruersa T (2016) Image-guided navigation surgery for pelvic malignancies using electromagnetic tracking. SPIE Med Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2216213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li FP, Rajchl M, White JA, Goela A, Peters TM (2015) Ultrasound guidance for beating heart mitral valve repair augmented by synthetic dynamic CT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 34(10):2025–2035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rivaz H, Chen SJS, Collins DL (2015) Automatic deformable MR-ultrasound registration for image-guided neurosurgery. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 34(2):366–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Simpfendörfer T, Baumhauer M, Müller M, Gutt CN, Meinzer HP, Rassweiler JJ, Guven S, Teber D (2011) Augmented reality visualization during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 25(12):1841–1845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sridhar AN, Hughes-Hallett A, Mayer EK, Pratt PJ, Edwards PJ, Yang GZ, Darzi AW, Vale JA (2013) Image-guided robotic interventions for prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 10(8):452–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Baumhauer M, Feuerstein M, Meinzer HP, Rassweiler J (2008) Navigation in endoscopic soft tissue surgery: perspectives and limitations. J Endourol 22(4):751–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Langø T, Vijayan S, Rethy A, Våpenstad C, Solberg OV, Mårvik R, Johnsen G, Hernes TN (2012) Navigated laparoscopic ultrasound in abdominal soft tissue surgery: technological overview and perspectives. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 7(4):585–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Penney GP, Blackall JM, Hamady MS, Sabharwal T, Adam A, Hawkes DJ (2004) Registration of freehand 3D ultrasound and magnetic resonance liver images. Med Image Anal 8(1):81–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Konishi K, Nakamoto M, Kakeji Y, Tanoue K, Kawanaka H, Yamaguchi S, Ieiri S, Sato Y, Maehara Y, Tamura S, Hashizume M (2007) A real-time navigation system for laparoscopic surgery based on three-dimensional ultrasound using magneto-optic hybrid tracking configuration. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Song Y, Totz J, Thompson S, Johnsen S, Barratt D, Schneider C, Gurusamy K, Davidson B, Ourselin S, Hawkes D, Clarkson MJ (2015) Locally rigid, vessel-based registration for laparoscopic liver surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10(12):1951–1961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sánchez-Margallo JA, Langø T, Hofstad EF, Mårvik R, Sánchez-Margallo FM (2017) Laparoscopic pancreas surgery: image guidance solutions. In: Laparoscopic surgery. InTech, London

  21. Schneider C, Guerrero J, Nguan C, Rohling R, Salcudean S (2011) Intra-operative “Pick-Up” ultrasound for robot assisted surgery with vessel extraction and registration: a feasibility study. In: International Conference on Information Processing in Computer-Assisted Interventions, IPCAI 2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6689, 122–132, Berlin, Heidelberg

  22. Pratt P, Di Marco A, Payne C, Darzi A, Yang GZ (2012) Intraoperative ultrasound guidance for transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 15(1):463–470

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pratt P, Jaeger A, Hughes-Hallett A, Mayer E, Vale J, Darzi A, Peters T, Yang GZ (2015) Robust ultrasound probe tracking: initial clinical experiences during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10(12):1905–1913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jayarathne UL, McLeod AJ, Peters TM, Chen EC (2013) Robust intraoperative US probe tracking using a monocular endoscopic camera. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, p 363–370

  25. Zhang L, Ye M, Chan PL, Yang GZ (2017) Real-time surgical tool tracking and pose estimation using a hybrid cylindrical marker. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 12(6):921–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang J, Kobayashi E, Sakuma I (2015) Coarse-to-fine dot array marker detection with accurate edge localization for stereo visual tracking. Biomed Signal Process Control 15:49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ma L, Kiyomatsu H, Nakagawa K, Wang J, Kobayashi E, Sakuma I (2018) Accurate vessel segmentation in ultrasound images using a local-phase-based snake. Biomed Signal Process Control 43:236–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ma L, Nakamae K, Wang J, Kiyomatsu H, Tsukihara H, Kobayashi E, Sakuma I (2017) Image-guided laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection using stereo visual tracking free-hand laparoscopic ultrasound. In: The 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Jeju, Korea, p 3240–3243

  29. Belaid A, Boukerroui D, Maingourd Y, Lerallut JF (2011) Phase-based level set segmentation of ultrasound images. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 15(1):138–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kass M, Witkin A, Terzopoulos D (1988) Snakes: active contour models. Int J Comput Vision 1(4):321–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Läthén G, Jonasson J, Borga M (2010) Blood vessel segmentation using multi-scale quadrature filtering. Pattern Recogn Lett 31(8):762–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kiyomatsu H, Wang J, Ma L, Kiyomatsu T, Kobayashi E, Sakuma I, Watanabe T (2016) Evaluation of pelvic arteries displacement by postural changes. In: The 12th Asian Conference on Computer-Aided Surgery, Daejeon, Korea

  33. Olson CF, Abi-Rached H (2010) Wide-baseline stereo vision for terrain mapping. Mach Vis Appl 21(5):713–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 26108008 and a Joint Research Project. This work was also partly supported by the JST COI Grant Number JPMJCEJPMJCE1304.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Etsuko Kobayashi.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Etsuko Kobayashi and Dr. Ichiro Sakuma received grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. Dr. Lei Ma, Dr. Junchen Wang, Mr. Hidemichi Kiyomatsu, and Dr. Hiroshi Tsukihara have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, L., Wang, J., Kiyomatsu, H. et al. Surgical navigation system for laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in rectal cancer surgery using laparoscopic-vision-tracked ultrasonic imaging. Surg Endosc 35, 6556–6567 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08153-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08153-8

Keywords

Navigation