Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Re-laparoscopy in the treatment of anastomotic leak following laparoscopic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Anastomotic leak still represents the most feared surgical complication following colorectal resection and is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic reoperation for symptomatic anastomotic leak (AL) after laparoscopic right colectomy with mechanical intracorporeal anastomosis (IA).

Methods

From January 2012 to December 2019, 428 consecutive laparoscopic right colectomy with IA were performed. Overall symptomatic AL rate requiring reoperation was 5.8% (26/428). Data on patient demographics as well as operative findings, time elapsed from primary surgery and from the onset of symptoms of anastomotic leak, time and duration of re-laparoscopy, ICU stay, morbidity, mortality rate, length of hospital stay and readmission, were all retrospectively reviewed.

Results

Laparoscopic approach was attempted in 23 (88.4%) hemodynamically stable patients. Conversion rate was 21.4%. Reasons for conversion were gross fecal peritonitis (n = 2), colonic ischemia (n = 1), severe bowel distension (n = 2). Eighteen (78.2%) patients underwent successfully laparoscopic (LPS) reoperation. A repair of the anastomotic defect was done in 11 (61.1%) patients, while in 7 patients the intracorporeal mechanical anastomosis was refashioned. A diverting ileostomy was done in 22.2% of cases (n = 4). A second reoperation for leak persistence was necessary in two cases (11.1%). Median (range) length of postoperative hospital stay from re-laparoscopy was 15.5 (9–53) days. Overall morbidity rate was 38.7%. Mortality rate was 5.5% (n = 1)

Conclusion

laparoscopic re-intervention for the treatment of anastomotic leak following LPS right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis in hemodynamically stable and highly selected patients in the experienced hands of dedicated laparoscopic surgeons, is a safe option with acceptable morbidity and mortality rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Soeters PB, de Zoete JP, Dejong CH, Williams NS, Baeten CG (2002) Colorectal surgery and anastomotic leakage. Dig Surg 19:150–155. https://doi.org/10.1159/0000520312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buchs NC, Gervaz P, Secic M, Bucher P, Mugnier-Konrad B, Morel P (2008) Incidence, consequences, and risk factors for anastomotic dehiscence after colorectal surgery: a prospective monocentric study. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:265–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-007-0399-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Joh YG, Kim SH, Hahn KY, Stulberg J, Chung CS, Lee DK (2009) Anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic proctectomy can be managed by a minimally invasive approach. Dis Colon Rectum 52:91–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181973d7f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vennix S, Abegg R, Bakker OJ, van den Boezem PB, Brokelman WJ, Sietses C, Bosscha K, Lips DJ, Prins HA (2014) Surgical re-interventions following colorectal surgery: open versus laparoscopic management of anastomotic leakage. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:739–774. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2012.0440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wind J, Koopman AG, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Slors JF, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA (2007) Laparoscopic re-intervention for anastomotic leakage after primary laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 94:1562–1566. https://doi.org/10.1002/BJS.5892

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang KH, Bourke MG, Kavanagh DO, Neary PC, O’Riordan JM (2016) A systematic review of the role of re-laparoscopy in the management of complications following laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surgeon 14:287–2939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2015.12.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wright DB, Koh CE, Solomon MJ (2017) Systematic review of the feasibility of laparoscopic reoperation for early postoperative com-plications following colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 104:337–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eriksen JR, Ovesen H (2018) Gogenur I (2018) Short and long-term outcomes after colorectal anastomotic leakage is affected by surgical approach at reoperation. Int J Colorectal Dis 33:1097–1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3079-6,May12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Li YW, Lian P, Huang B, Zheng HT, Wang MH, Gu WL, Li XX, Xu Y, Cai SJ (2017) Very early colorectal anastomotic leakage within 5 post-operative days: a more severe subtype needs relaparatomy. Sci Rep 7:39936. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39936

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Vignali A, Elmore U, Lemma M, Guarnieri G, Radaelli G (2018) Rosati R (2018) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomoses following laparoscopic right colectomy in obese patients: a case-matched study. Dig Surg 35:236–242. https://doi.org/10.1159/000479241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cuccurullo D, Pirozzi F, Sciuto A, Bracale U, La Barbera C, Galante F, Corcione F (2015) Re-laparoscopy for management of postoperative complications following colorectal surgery: ten years experience in a single center. Surg Endosc 29:1795–1803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3862-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Marano A, Giuffrida MC, Giraudo G, Pellegrino L, Borghi F (2016) Management of peritonitis after minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Can we stick to laparoscopy ? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 27:342–347. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2016.0374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bakker IS, Grossmann I, Henneman D, Havenga K, Wiggers T (2014) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and leak-related mortality after colonic cancer surgery in a nationwide audit. BJS 101:424–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Garcia-Granero A, Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Blanco F, Puga R, Carratalá A, Garcia-Granero E (2013) Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as early predictors of anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: a prospective observational study. Dis Colon Rectum. 56:475–483. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e31826ce825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Daams F, Wu Z, Lahaye MJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2014) Prediction and diagnosis of colorectal anastomotic leakage: a systematic review of literature. World J Gastrointest Surg 6:14–26. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v6.i2.14

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cimitan A, Contaldo T, Malaro R, Morpurgo E (2016) The role of laparoscopy in the treatment of anastomotic leak after minimally invasive colorectal resection for cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 26:e80. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Thornton M, Joshi H, Vimalachandran C, Heath R, Carter P, Gur U, Rooney P (2011) Management and outcome of colorectal anastomotic leaks. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:313–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-1094-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fraccalvieri D, Biondo S, Saez J, Millan M, Kreisler E, Golda T, Frago R, Miguel B (2012) Management of colorectal anastomotic leakage: differences between salvage and anastomotic takedown. Am J Surg 204:671–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.04.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kwak JM, Kim SH, Son DN, Kim J, Lee SI, Min BW, Um JW, Moon HY (2011) The role of laparoscopic approach for anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:29–33. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2010.0407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy

    Andrea Vignali, Ugo Elmore, Francesca Aleotti, Delpini Roberto, Paolo Parise & Riccardo Rosati

  2. Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy

    Andrea Vignali & Riccardo Rosati

Authors
  1. Andrea Vignali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ugo Elmore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francesca Aleotti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Delpini Roberto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Paolo Parise
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Riccardo Rosati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Vignali.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Professor Andrea Vignali, Drs. Ugo Elmore, Francesca Aleotti, Roberto Delpini, Paolo Parise and Professor Riccardo Rosati declare that they have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vignali, A., Elmore, U., Aleotti, F. et al. Re-laparoscopy in the treatment of anastomotic leak following laparoscopic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis. Surg Endosc 35, 6173–6178 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08113-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08113-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation