Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy: comparison of reconstituting and fenestrating techniques

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (LSC) is a safe bailout procedure in situations when dissection of "critical view of safety" is not possible. After the proposed classification of subtotal cholecystectomy into "fenestrating" and "reconstituting" techniques in 2016, a comparative review of the outcomes of both methods is timely.

Methods

A literature search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science database was conducted up to January 31, 2020 for studies that reported LSC. Studies reporting LSC only in patients with Mirizzi syndrome or xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis were excluded. Our analysis includes 39 studies with 1784 cases of LSC. We report a comparison of outcomes between reconstituting and fenestrating LSC on 1505 cases [935 reconstituting (62.1%) and 570 fenestrating (37.9%)].

Results

Following LSC, the rate of open conversion is 7.7%, hemorrhage is 0.4%, bile duct injury is 0.3%, bile leak is 15.4%, retained stone is 4.6%, subhepatic or subphrenic collection is 2.9%, superficial surgical site infection is 2.0% and 30-day mortality is 0.2%. 8.8% of patients required postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), 1.1% required percutaneous intervention, and 2.2% required reoperation. Compared to reconstituting LSC, fenestrating LSC has a higher incidence of open conversion (n = 58, 10.2% vs. n = 43, 4.6%, p < 0.001), retained stones (n = 38, 6.7% vs. n = 38, 4.1%, p = 0.0253), subhepatic or subphrenic collections (n = 33, 5.8% vs. n = 13, 1.4%, p < 0.001), superficial surgical site infections (n = 18, 3.2% vs. n = 14, 1.5%, p = 0.0303), postoperative ERCP (n = 82, 14.4% vs. n = 62, 6.6%, p < 0.001), and need for reoperation (n = 20, 3.5% vs. n = 12, 1.3%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Although reconstituting LSC has better outcomes, both techniques are complementary. Intraoperative findings and surgical expertise impact the choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yamashita Y, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Pitt HA, Gouma DJ, Garden OJ, Buchler MW, Gomi H, Dervenis C, Windsor JA, Kim SW, de Santibanes E, Padbury R, Chen XP, Chan AC, Fan ST, Jagannath P, Mayumi T, Yoshida M, Miura F, Tsuyuguchi T, Itoi T, Supe AN (2013) TG13 surgical management of acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20:89–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. van de Graaf FW, Zaimi I, Stassen LPS, Lange JF (2018) Safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review of bile duct injury prevention. Int J Surg (London, England) 60:164–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Strasberg SM, Pucci MJ, Brunt LM, Deziel DJ (2016) Subtotal cholecystectomy-"Fenestrating" vs “Reconstituting” subtypes and the prevention of bile duct injury: definition of the optimal procedure in difficult operative conditions. J Am Coll Surg 222:89–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Strasberg SM, Brunt LM (2010) Rationale and use of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 211:132–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shea JA, Healey MJ, Berlin JA, Clarke JR, Malet PF, Staroscik RN, Schwartz JS, Williams SV (1996) Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 224:609–620

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Beldi G, Glattli A (2003) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for severe cholecystitis. Surg Endosc 17:1437–1439

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee J, Miller P, Kermani R, Dao H, O’Donnell K (2012) Gallbladder damage control: compromised procedure for compromised patients. Surg Endosc 26:2779–2783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Michalowski K, Bornman PC, Krige JE, Gallagher PJ, Terblanche J (1998) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in patients with complicated acute cholecystitis or fibrosis. Br J Surg 85:904–906

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chowbey PK, Sharma A, Khullar R, Mann V, Baijal M, Vashistha A (2000) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy: a review of 56 procedures. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 10:31–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sinha I, Smith ML, Safranek P, Dehn T, Booth M (2007) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy without cystic duct ligation. Br J Surg 94:1527–1529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wolf AS, Nijsse BA, Sokal SM, Chang Y, Berger DL (2009) Surgical outcomes of open cholecystectomy in the laparoscopic era. Am J Surg 197:781–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McCoy AC, Gasevic E, Szlabick RE, Sahmoun AE, Sticca RP (2013) Are open abdominal procedures a thing of the past? An analysis of graduating general surgery residents’ case logs from 2000 to 2011. J Surg Educ 70:683–689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharp CF, Garza RZ, Mangram AJ, Dunn EL (2009) Partial cholecystectomy in the setting of severe inflammation is an acceptable consideration with few long-term sequelae. Am Surg 75:249–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bornman PC, Terblanche J (1985) Subtotal cholecystectomy: for the difficult gallbladder in portal hypertension and cholecystitis. Surgery 98:1–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bickel A, Shtamler B (1993) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 3:365–367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Crosthwaite G, McKay C, Anderson JR (1995) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy. J R Coll Surg Edinb 40:20–21

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ji W, Li LT, Li JS (2006) Role of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in the treatment of complicated cholecystitis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 5:584–589

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Palanivelu C, Jani K, Maheshkumar GS (2007) Single-center experience of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 17:608–614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Horiuchi A, Watanabe Y, Doi T, Sato K, Yukumi S, Yoshida M, Yamamoto Y, Sugishita H, Kawachi K (2008) Delayed laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis with severe fibrotic adhesions. Surg Endosc 22:2720–2723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Philips JA, Lawes DA, Cook AJ, Arulampalam TH, Zaborsky A, Menzies D, Motson RW (2008) The use of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for complicated cholelithiasis. Surg Endosc 22:1697–1700

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hussain A, El-Hasani S (2009) The use of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for complicated cholelithiasis. Surg Endosc 23:913

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nakajima J, Sasaki A, Obuchi T, Baba S, Nitta H, Wakabayashi G (2009) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for severe cholecystitis. Surg Today 39:870–875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Singhal T, Balakrishnan S, Hussain A, Nicholls J, Grandy-Smith S, El-Hasani S (2009) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy: initial experience with laparoscopic management of difficult cholecystitis. Surgeon 7:263–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tian Y, Wu SD, Su Y, Kong J, Yu H, Fan Y (2009) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy as an alternative procedure designed to prevent bile duct injury: experience of a hospital in northern China. Surg Today 39:510–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Henneman D, da Costa DW, Vrouenraets BC, van Wagensveld BA, Lagarde SM (2013) Laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy for the difficult gallbladder: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 27:351–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tamura A, Ishii J, Katagiri T, Maeda T, Kubota Y, Kaneko H (2013) Effectiveness of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy: perioperative and long-term postoperative results. Hepatogastroenterology 60:1280–1283

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Elshaer M, Gravante G, Thomas K, Sorge R, Al-Hamali S, Ebdewi H (2015) Subtotal cholecystectomy for “difficult gallbladders”: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg 150:159–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sabour AF, Matsushima K, Love BE, Alicuben ET, Schellenberg MA, Inaba K, Demetriades D (2020) Nationwide trends in the use of subtotal cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Surgery 167:569–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I (2005) Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5:13

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Slater M, Midya S, Booth M (2019) Re-interventions and re-admissions in a 13-year series following use of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy. J Minim Access Surg. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_124_19

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Hirajima S, Koh T, Sakai T, Imamura T, Kato S, Nishimura Y, Soga K, Nishio M, Oguro A, Nakagawa N (2017) Utility of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy with or without cystic duct ligation for severe cholecystitis. Am Surg 83:1209–1213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ransom KJ (1998) Laparoscopic management of acute cholecystitis with subtotal cholecystectomy. Am Surg 64:955–957

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T (2000) The difficult gallbladder: technical tips for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10:249–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Jani K, Shetty AR, Sendhilkumar K, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarthi R (2006) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients: the role of subtotal cholecystectomy and its variants. J Am Coll Surg 203:145–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bonavina L (2007) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 204:337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hubert C, Annet L, van Beers BE, Gigot JF (2010) The “inside approach of the gallbladder” is an alternative to the classic Calot’s triangle dissection for a safe operation in severe cholecystitis. Surg Endosc 24:2626–2632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jeong IO, Kim JY, Choe YM, Choi SK, Heo YS, Lee KY, Kim SJ, Cho YU, Ahn SI, Hong KC, Kim KR, Shin SH (2011) Efficacy and feasibility of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 15:225–230

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Kuwabara J, Watanabe Y, Kameoka K, Horiuchi A, Sato K, Yukumi S, Yoshida M, Yamamoto Y, Sugishita H (2014) Usefulness of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy with operative cholangiography for severe cholecystitis. Surg Today 44:462–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dissanaike S (2016) A step-by-step guide to laparoscopic subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy: a damage control approach to the difficult gallbladder. J Am Coll Surg 223:e15-18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Harilingam MR, Shrestha AK, Basu S (2016) Laparoscopic modified subtotal cholecystectomy for difficult gall bladders: a single-centre experience. J Minim Access Surg 12:325–329

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Kulen F, Tihan D, Duman U, Bayam E, Zaim G (2016) Laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy: a safe and effective alternative surgical technique in “difficult cholecystectomies.” Ulus Cerrahi Derg 32:185–190

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Yoon PD, Pang T, Siriwardhane M, Richardson A, Hollands M, Pleass H, Johnston E, Yuen L, Lam V (2016) Laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy: a way of getting out of trouble. Int J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis 6:68–75

    Google Scholar 

  43. Shin M, Choi N, Yoo Y, Kim Y, Kim S, Mun S (2016) Clinical outcomes of subtotal cholecystectomy performed for difficult cholecystectomy. Ann Surg Treat Res 91:226–232

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Shingu Y, Komatsu S, Norimizu S, Taguchi Y, Sakamoto E (2016) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for severe cholecystitis. Surg Endosc 30:526–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Abdelrahim WE, Elsiddig KE, Wahab AA, Saad M, Saeed H, Khalil EAG (2017) Subtotal laparoscopic cholecystectomy influences the rate of conversion in patients with difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: case series. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 19:19–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Jara G, Rosciano J, Barrios W, Vegas L, Rodriguez O, Sanchez R, Sanchez A (2017) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy: a surgical alternative to reduce complications in complex cases. Cir Esp 95:465–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lidsky ME, Speicher PJ, Ezekian B, Holt EW, Nussbaum DP, Castleberry AW, Perez A, Pappas TN (2017) Subtotal cholecystectomy for the hostile gallbladder: failure to control the cystic duct results in significant morbidity. HPB 19:547–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Matrafi MSA, Aljehani MJA, Bisri AMO, Alghamdi BSA, Almalki SAM, Alziyadi AH, Almarkhan MHN, Bukhari HSH, Ashmawi MT, Al-Anezi AM, Emam MA, Aljishi BF, Awami EKA, Anani EJ, Alnami AMQ, Abdulmohsen AS (2017) Subtotal cholecystectomy for the treatment of difficult gall bladder. EC Gastroenterol Dig Syst 3:56–61

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ozcinar B, Memisoglu E, Gok AFK, Agcaoglu O, Yanar F, Ilhan M, Yanar HT, Gunay K (2017) Damage-control laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy with an endoscopic linear stapler. Turk J Surg 33:37–39

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Supit C, Supit T, Mazni Y, Basir I (2017) The outcome of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in difficult cases—a case series. Int J Surg Case Rep 41:311–314

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. van Dijk AH, Donkervoort SC, Lameris W, de Vries E, Eijsbouts QAJ, Vrouenraets BC, Busch OR, Boermeester MA, de Reuver PR (2017) Short- and long-term outcomes after a reconstituting and fenestrating subtotal cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 225:371–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Matsumura T, Komatsu S, Komaya K, Ando K, Arikawa T, Ishiguro S, Saito T, Osawa T, Kurahashi S, Uchino T, Yasui K, Kato S, Suzuki K, Kato Y, Sano T (2018) Closure of the cystic duct orifice in laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for severe cholecystitis. Asian J Endosc Surg 11:206–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Sormaz IC, Soytas Y, Gok AFK, Ozgur I, Avtan L (2018) Fundus-first technique and partial cholecystectomy for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 24:66–70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Purzner RH, Ho KB, Al-Sukhni E, Jayaraman S (2019) Safe laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in the face of severe inflammation in the cystohepatic triangle: a retrospective review and proposed management strategy for the difficult gallbladder. Can J Surg 62:402–411

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Roesch-Dietlen F, Perez-Morales AG, Martinez-Fernandez S, Diaz-Roesch F, Gomez-Delgado JA, Remes-Troche JM (2019) Safety of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Experience in Southeast Mexico. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 84:461–466

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Kohn JF, Trenk A, Denham W, Linn JG, Haggerty S, Joehl R, Ujiki MB (2020) Long-term outcomes after subtotal reconstituting cholecystectomy: a retrospective case series. Am J Surg. 220:736–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.01.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Bhattacharjee P (2005) Bile duct injuries: Mechanism and prevention. Indian J Surg 67:73–77

    Google Scholar 

  58. Chia CL, Shelat VG, Low W, George S, Rao J (2014) The use of Collatamp G, local gentamicin-collagen sponge, in reducing wound infection. Int Surg 99:565–570

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Isherwood J, Oakland K, Khanna A (2019) A systematic review of the aetiology and management of post cholecystectomy syndrome. Surgeon 17:33–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Singh A, Kapoor A, Singh RK, Prakash A, Behari A, Kumar A, Kapoor VK, Saxena R (2018) Management of residual gall bladder: A 15-year experience from a north Indian tertiary care centre. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 22:36–41

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Gupta V, Sharma AK, Kumar P, Gupta M, Gulati A, Sinha SK, Kochhar R (2019) Residual gall bladder: an emerging disease after safe cholecystectomy. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 23:353–358

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Randi G, Franceschi S, La Vecchia C (2006) Gallbladder cancer worldwide: geographical distribution and risk factors. Int J Cancer 118:1591–1602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Mak MHW, Chew WL, Junnarkar SP, Woon WWL, Low J-K, Huey TCW, Shelat VG (2019) Patient reported outcomes in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 23:20–33

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Amirthalingam V, Low JK, Woon W, Shelat V (2017) Tokyo Guidelines 2013 may be too restrictive and patients with moderate and severe acute cholecystitis can be managed by early cholecystectomy too. Surg Endosc 31:2892–2900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore

    Jonathan G. A. Koo

  2. Biostatistics Unit, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    Yiong Huak Chan

  3. Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore

    Vishal G. Shelat

Authors
  1. Jonathan G. A. Koo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yiong Huak Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vishal G. Shelat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vishal G. Shelat.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Koo, Chan, and Shelat have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 33 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koo, J.G.A., Chan, Y.H. & Shelat, V.G. Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy: comparison of reconstituting and fenestrating techniques. Surg Endosc 35, 1014–1024 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08096-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08096-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation