Skip to main content
Log in

An evaluation of bariatric surgery in all military treatment facilities

  • 2020 SAGES Oral
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Multiple bariatric databases have been formed, but there have been no comprehensive assessments of military treatment facilities (MTFs). MTFs have unique patients and coverage policies by Tricare insurance.

Methods

MHS Mart (M2) was used to review the outpatient medical record, AHLTA, from October 2013 to December 2018 for type of bariatric procedure, demographics, military-specific data, comorbidities, and complications, which were identified by ICD code and CPT code, including a robotic modifier. MTFs were classified by volume as high (HV) with > 50 cases annually, moderate (MV) with 25 to 50 cases, and low (LV) with < 25 cases, as well as by the presence of surgical residencies.

Results

Patients at MTFs were slightly younger and more female than by other database studies. The Army was the most common branch of service, and dependents of retirees were the most common beneficiary population. MTFs with residencies had slightly older patients and fewer Army patients. HV, MV, and LV MTFs had similar patients except for branch of service. Over time, the proportion of open gastric bypasses increased, biliopancreatic diversions with duodenal switches decreased, and robotic assistance increased 744%. MTFs with residencies performed more procedures than those without residencies, and with the exception of procedures utilizing robotic assistance, procedures were overall similar to those without residencies. HV MTFs performed most of the procedures annually, and their procedures were proportionately similar to MV and LV MTFs, with the exception of HV MTFs having a higher proportion of laparoscopic bypasses and robotic assistance.

Conclusion

MTFs largely perform similar procedures on similar patients relative to MBSAQIP and NSQIP studies. Robotic assistance increased significantly over time. Except for laparoscopic bypasses and procedures with robotic assistance, HV MTFs performed similar proportions of procedures to MV and LV MTFs. MTFs with residencies performed similar procedures to those without residencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Galvin JW, Thompson JC, Thompson AM, Parada SA, Eichinger JK, Dickens JF, Gillingham BL (2019) A guide to understanding reimbursement and value-based care in the military health system. Mil Med. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usy206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee AN, Johnson R, Lakhani I, Happe LE (2018) Outcomes at bariatric surgery centers of excellence and non-designated centers: a retrospective cohort study in a TRICARE population. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/search/article?option1=tka&value1=Outcomes+at+Bariatric+Surgery+Centers+of+Excellence+and+Non.Designated+Centers.+A+Retrospective+Cohort+Study+in+a+TRICARE+Population&pageSize=10&index=1. Accessed 19 Feb 2020

  3. Tricare (2019) Is it covered. Bariatric surgery. https://www.tricare.mil/CoveredServices/IsItCovered/BariatricSurgery.aspx. Accessed 27 Nov 2019

  4. Health.mil (2019) Patients by beneficiary category. https://health.mil/I-Am-A/Media/Media-Center/Patient-Population-Statistics/Patients-by-Beneficiary-Category. Accessed 10 Dec 2019

  5. Parker K, Cilluffo A, Stepler R (2017) 6 facts about the U.S. military and its changing demographics. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/13/6-facts-about-the-u-s-military-and-its-changing-demographics/. Accessed 21 Feb 2020

  6. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration (2017) Use of real-world evidence to support regulatory decision-making for medical devices. https://www.fda.gov/media/99447/download. Accessed 21 Feb 2020

  7. Lucyk K, Tang K, Quan H (2003) Barriers to data quality resulting from the process of coding health information to administrative: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2697-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Health.mil (2019) Military health system management analysis and reporting tool. https://www.health.mil/Military-Health-Topics/Technology/Clinical-Support/Military-Health-System-Management-Analysis-and-Reporting-Tool. Accessed 25 Feb 2020

  9. Health.mil (2008) Capturing outpatient health care with AHLTA. https://health.mil/Military-Health-Topics/Technology/Military-Electronic-Health-Record/Garrison/Capturing-Outpatient-Documentation. Accessed 25 Feb 2020

  10. Staggers N, Jennings BM, Lasome CE (2010) A usability assessment of AHLTA in ambulatory clinics at a military medical center. Military Med. https://doi.org/10.7205/milmed-d-09-00285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kirstin Grace-Simons (2019) Madigan educates on MHS GENESIS. https://www.army.mil/article/228201/madigan_educates_on_mhs_genesis. Accessed 25 Feb 2020

  12. English WJ, DeMaria EJ, Brethauer SA, Mattar SG, Rosenthal RJ, Morton JM (2017) American Society for metabolic and bariatric surgery estimation of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States in 2016. Surg Obes Relat Dis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2017.12.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (2018) Estimate of bariatric surgery numbers, 2011–2018. https://asmbs.org/resources/estimate-of-bariatric-surgery-numbers. Accessed 10 Dec 2019

  14. Kumar SB, Hamilton BC, Wood SG, Rogers SJ, Carter JT, Lin MY (2018) Is laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy safer than laparoscopic gastric bypass? A comparison of 30-day complications using the MBSAQIP data registry. Surg Obes Relat Dis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2017.12.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sebastien R, Howell MH, Chang K, Adrales G, Magnuson T, Schweitzer M, Nguyen H (2018) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched comprehensive analysis using the 2015–2016 MBSAQIP database. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6422-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pratt GM, McLees B, Pories WJ (2006) The ASBS Bariatric surgery centers of excellence program: a blue print for quality improvement. Surg Obes Relat Dis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2006.07.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tang L, Song AY, Choi S, Fernstrom M, Rubin JP (2007) Completing the metamorphosis: building a center of excellence in post bariatric plastic surgery. Ann Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000250752.42524.2f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuo LE, Simmons KD, Kelz RR (2015) Bariatric centers of excellence: effect of centralization on access to care. J Am Coll Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.07.452

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Morales MP, Wheeler AA, Ramaswamy A, Scott JS, de la Torre RA (2009) Laparoscopic revisional surgery after Roux-en-gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2009.09.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. American Board of Surgery (2019) Booklet of information. 2019–2020. https://absurgery.org/xfer/BookletofInfo-Surgery.pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2020

  21. Sanni A, Perez S, Medbery R, Urrego HD, McCready C, Toro JP, Patel AD, Lin E, Sweeney JF, Davis SS (2014) Postoperative complications in bariatric surgery using age and BMI stratification: a study using ACS-NSQIP data. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3606-

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Newhook JT, Gregory D, Twells L (2015) 'Fat girls' and 'big guys': gendered meanings of weight loss surgery. Sociol Health Illn. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Edward KL, Hii MW, Giandinoto JA, Hennessy J, Thompson L (2018) Personal descriptions of life before and after bariatric surgery from overweight or obese men. Am J Mens Health. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988316630770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Young MT, Gebhart A, Phelan MJ, Nguyen NT (2015) Use and outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic gastric bypass: analysis of the american college of surgeons NSQIP. J Am Coll Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.01.059

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Knudson MM, Elster EA, Bailey JA, Johannigman JA, Bailey PV, Schwab CW, Kirk GG, Woodson JA (2018) Military-civilian partnerships in training, sustaining recruitment, retention, and readiness: proceedings from an exploratory first-steps meeting. J Am Coll Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.04.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Edwards MJ, Edwards KD, White C, Shepps C, Shackelford S (2016) Saving the military surgeon: maintaining critical clinical skills in a changing military and medical environment. J Am Coll Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.03.031

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Traynor K (2013) Defense health agency makes its debut. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. https://doi.org/10.2146/news130082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lloyd JT, Blackwell SA, Wei II, Howell BJ, Shrank WH (2015) Validity of a claims-based diagnosis of obesity among medicare beneficiaries. Eval Health Prof. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278714553661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ammann EM, Kalsekar I, Yoo A, Scamuffa R, Hsiao C, Stokes AC, Morton JM, Johnston SS (2019) Assessment of obesity prevalence and validity of obesity diagnoses coded in claims data for selected surgical populations: a retrospective, observational study. Medicine (Baltimore). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Clapp B, Devemark CD, Jones R, Dodoo C, Mallawaarachchi I, Tyroch A (2019) Comparison of perioperative bariatric complications using 2 large databases: does the data add up? Surg Obes Relat Dis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2019.03.041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Study design and concept development by Byron Faler MD. IRB submission by Marcos Aranda MD. Data gathering and analysis by Jeffrey Ling MD, William Chang MD, and Marcos Aranda MD. Manuscript composition by Marcos Aranda MD and Byron Faler MD. Final approval of all components of the publication by Byron Faler MD. Additional assistance with statistical data analysis from Balakrishna Prasad PhD.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcos Aranda.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the US government. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Dr. Aranda, Dr. Ling, Dr. Chang, and Dr. Faler have no conflicts of interests or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aranda, M., Ling, J., Chang, W. et al. An evaluation of bariatric surgery in all military treatment facilities. Surg Endosc 35, 5810–5815 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08079-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08079-1

Keywords

Navigation