Skip to main content
Log in

Predictive factors for difficult endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal neoplasia including failure of en bloc resection or perforation

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is accepted as the standard treatment for early-stage esophageal neoplasia. However, esophageal perforation may occur, leading to mediastinitis and pneumothorax, which occasionally require emergency surgery. Moreover, failure of en bloc resection causes local recurrence. However, studies on the predictors of such difficulties during ESD are limited. Hence, we evaluated the predictors associated with the difficulty of ESD for esophageal neoplasia including failure of en bloc resection or perforation.

Methods

Data of 549 consecutive patients who were treated with ESD between May 2004 and March 2016 at a single institution were retrospectively studied. Exclusion criteria were the presence of metachronous esophageal neoplasia or missing data. The primary outcome was determining the predictors associated with the difficulty of ESD for esophageal neoplasia including failure of en bloc resection or perforation.

Results

Altogether, 543 patients with 736 lesions were evaluated. Failure of en bloc resection occurred in 6 patients (1.1%) with 6 lesions, and perforation occurred in 11 patients (2.0%) with 11 lesions (1.5%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that large lesion diameter (odds ratio [OR] 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21–1.84; p < 0.001) and previous chemoradiotherapy (OR 5.24; 95% CI 1.52–18.06; p = 0.009) were independent predictive factors.

Conclusions

Larger lesions and previous chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer increased the risk for failure of en bloc resection or perforation in patients who underwent esophageal ESD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ (2003) Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 349:2241–2252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, Thun MJ (2008) Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 58:71–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Muto M, Minashi K, Yano T, Saito Y, Oda I, Nonaka S, Omori T, Sugiura H, Goda K, Kaise M, Inoue H, Ishikawa H, Ochiai A, Shimoda T, Watanabe H, Tajiri H, Saito D (2010) Early detection of superficial squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck region and esophagus by narrow band imaging: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 28:1566–1572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nagami Y, Tominaga K, Machida H, Nakatani M, Kameda N, Sugimori S, Okazaki H, Tanigawa T, Yamagami H, Kubo N, Shiba M, Watanabe K, Watanabe T, Iguchi H, Fujiwara Y, Ohira M, Hirakawa K, Arakawa T (2014) Usefulness of non-magnifying narrow-band imaging in screening of early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective comparative study using propensity score matching. Am J Gastroenterol 109:845–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nagami Y, Ominami M, Shiba M, Minamino H, Fukunaga S, Kameda N, Sugimori S, Machida H, Tanigawa T, Yamagami H, Watanabe T, Tominaga K, Fujiwara Y, Arakawa T (2016) The five-year survival rate after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasia. Dig Liver Dis

  6. Ono S, Fujishiro M, Niimi K, Goto O, Kodashima S, Yamamichi N, Omata M (2009) Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc 70:860–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsujii Y, Nishida T, Nishiyama O, Yamamoto K, Kawai N, Yamaguchi S, Yamada T, Yoshio T, Kitamura S, Nakamura T, Nishihara A, Ogiyama H, Nakahara M, Komori M, Kato M, Hayashi Y, Shinzaki S, Iijima H, Michida T, Tsujii M, Takehara T (2015) Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplasms: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Endoscopy 47:775–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ishihara R, Iishi H, Uedo N, Takeuchi Y, Yamamoto S, Yamada T, Masuda E, Higashino K, Kato M, Narahara H, Tatsuta M (2008) Comparison of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for en bloc resection of early esophageal cancers in Japan. Gastrointest Endosc 68:1066–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yamamoto Y, Kikuchi D, Nagami Y, Nonaka K, Tsuji Y, Fujimoto A, Sanomura Y, Tanaka K, Abe S, Zhang S, De Lusong MA, Uedo N (2019) Management of adverse events related to endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal neoplasms: review of the literature and recommendations from experts. Dig Endosc 31(Suppl 1):4–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Imai K, Hotta K, Yamaguchi Y, Kakushima N, Tanaka M, Takizawa K, Kawata N, Matsubayashi H, Shimoda T, Mori K, Ono H (2016) Preoperative indicators of failure of en bloc resection or perforation in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: implications for lesion stratification by technical difficulties during stepwise training. Gastrointest Endosc 83:954–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim JH, Nam HS, Choi CW, Kang DH, Kim HW, Park SB, Kim SJ, Hwang SH, Lee SH (2017) Risk factors associated with difficult gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: predicting difficult ESD. Surg Endosc 31:1617–1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mizushima T, Kato M, Iwanaga I, Sato F, Kubo K, Ehira N, Uebayashi M, Ono S, Nakagawa M, Mabe K, Shimizu Y, Sakamoto N (2015) Technical difficulty according to location, and risk factors for perforation, in endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal tumors. Surg Endosc 29:133–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yano T, Hasuike N, Ono H, Boku N, Ogawa G, Kadota T, Oda I, Doyama H, Hori S, Iishi H, Takahashi A, Takizawa K, Muto M (2020) Factors associated with technical difficulty of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer that met the expanded indication criteria: post hoc analysis of a multi-institutional prospective confirmatory trial (JCOG0607). Gastric Cancer 23:168–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hazama H, Tanaka M, Kakushima N, Yabuuchi Y, Yoshida M, Kawata N, Takizawa K, Ito S, Imai K, Hotta K, Ishiwatari H, Matsubayashi H, Mori K, Ono H (2019) Predictors of technical difficulty during endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 33:2909–2915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Odagiri H, Yasunaga H, Matsui H, Matsui S, Fushimi K, Kaise M (2017) Hospital volume and adverse events following esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection in Japan. Endoscopy 49:321–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ominami M, Nagami Y, Shiba M, Tominaga K, Sakai T, Maruyama H, Kato K, Minamino H, Fukunaga S, Tanaka F, Sugimori S, Kamata N, Machida H, Yamagami H, Tanigawa T, Watanabe T, Fujiwara Y, Arakawa T (2018) Comparison of propofol with midazolam in endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. J Gastroenterol 53:397–406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nagami Y, Ominami M, Shiba M, Sakai T, Fukunaga S, Sugimori S, Otani K, Hosomi S, Tanaka F, Taira K, Kamata N, Yamagami H, Tanigawa T, Watanabe T, Ishihara T, Yamamoto K, Fujiwara Y (2018) Prediction of esophageal stricture in patients given locoregional triamcinolone injections immediately after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dig Endosc 30:198–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nagami Y, Shiba M, Ominami M, Sakai T, Minamino H, Fukunaga S, Sugimori S, Tanaka F, Kamata N, Tanigawa T, Yamagami H, Watanabe T, Tominaga K, Fujiwara Y, Arakawa T (2017) Single locoregional triamcinolone injection immediately after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection prevents stricture formation. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 8:e75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Noguchi M, Yano T, Kato T, Kadota T, Imajoh M, Morimoto H, Osera S, Yagishita A, Odagaki T, Yoda Y, Oono Y, Ikematsu H, Kaneko K (2017) Risk factors for intraoperative perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 23:478–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Maeda Y, Hirasawa D, Fujita N, Ohira T, Harada Y, Yamagata T, Koike Y, Suzuki K (2016) Carbon dioxide insufflation in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection reduces mediastinal emphysema: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 22:7373–7382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim JS, Kim BW, Shin IS (2014) Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial squamous esophageal neoplasia: a meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci 59:1862–1869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Huh CW, Lee HH, Kim BW, Kim JS, Lee BI, Lim CH, Kim J (2018) Predictive factors of submucosal fibrosis before endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial squamous esophageal neoplasia. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 9:159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yoshida M, Takizawa K, Nonaka S, Shichijo S, Suzuki S, Sato C, Komori H, Minagawa T, Oda I, Uedo N, Hirasawa K, Matsumoto K, Sumiyoshi T, Mori K, Gotoda T, Ono H (2020) Conventional versus traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for large esophageal cancers: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 91(55–65):e52

    Google Scholar 

  24. Koizumi S, Jin M, Matsuhashi T, Tawaraya S, Watanabe N, Sawaguchi M, Kanazawa N, Yamada Y, Onochi K, Kimura Y, Ohba R, Kataoka J, Hatakeyma N, Mashima H, Ohnishi H (2014) Salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection for the esophagus-localized recurrence of esophageal squamous cell cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy. Gastrointest Endosc 79:348–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nakajo K, Yoda Y, Hori K, Takashima K, Sinmura K, Oono Y, Ikematsu H, Yano T (2018) Technical feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for local failure after chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 88:637–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Takeuchi M, Kobayashi M, Hashimoto S, Mizuno K, Kawaguchi G, Sasamoto R, Aoyama H, Aoyagi Y (2013) Salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with local failure after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Scand J Gastroenterol 48:1095–1101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing.

Funding

No funders and grants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasuaki Nagami.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Nagami, Ominami, Sakai, Maruyama, Fukunaga, Otani, Hosomi, Tanaka, Taira, Kamata, Tanigawa, Shiba, Watanabe, Fujiwara have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nagami, Y., Ominami, M., Sakai, T. et al. Predictive factors for difficult endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal neoplasia including failure of en bloc resection or perforation. Surg Endosc 35, 3361–3369 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07777-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07777-0

Keywords

Navigation