Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In the eye of the beholder: surgeon variation in intra-operative perceptions of hiatal hernia and reflux outcomes after sleeve gastrectomy

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Hiatal hernia repair performed at the time of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) may reduce post-operative reflux symptoms. It is unclear whether intra-operative diagnosis of hiatal hernia varies among surgeons or if it affects outcomes.

Study design

Surgeons (n = 38) participating in a statewide bariatric surgery quality improvement collaborative reviewed 33 videos of LSG in which no hiatal hernia repair was performed. Reviewers were blinded to patient information and were asked whether they perceived a hiatal hernia. Surgeon characteristics and surgeon-specific patient outcomes for LSG were compared between surgeons who identified at least one hiatal hernia during video review and those who did not.

Results

Ten surgeons (26%) identified at least one hiatal hernia after reviewing the videos. There were no significant differences in operative experience or practice type between surgeons who did and did not identify hiatal hernias. Surgeons who identified a hiatal hernia more often performed concurrent hiatal hernia repair in their practice when compared to those who did not (43.0% versus 36.5%, p < 0.001). Although complication rates were similar between surgeon groups, there were higher rates of de novo reflux symptoms (13.6% versus 11.1%, p = 0.032) and lower rates of antacid discontinuation at one-year (71.0% versus 77.2%, p = 0.043) among surgeons who identified hiatal hernias.

Conclusion

Surgeons who identified hiatal hernias during video review had a higher rate of concurrent hiatal hernia repairs in their practice. This was not associated with improved patient-reported reflux symptoms after LSG. Standardizing identification and management of hiatal hernias during bariatric surgery may help improve reflux outcomes post-operatively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LSG:

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

GERD:

Gastroesophageal reflux disease

UGI:

Upper gastrointestinal series

EGD:

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

MBSC:

Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative

GERD-HRQL:

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life

BMI:

Body mass index

References

  1. Varela JE, Nguyen NT (2015) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leads the US utilization of bariatric surgery at academic medical centers. Surg Obes Related Dis 11:987–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Reames BN, Finks JF, Bacal D, Carlin AM, Dimick JB (2014) Changes in bariatric surgery procedure use in Michigan, 2006–2013. JAMA 312:959–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Estimate of Bariatric Surgery Numbers, 2011–2017. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.

  4. Hutter MM et al (2011) First report from the American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Center Network: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has morbidity and effectiveness positioned between the band and the bypass. Ann Surg 254:410–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Patti MG, Schlottmann F (2018) Gastroesophageal reflux after sleeve gastrectomy. JAMA Surg 153:1147–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Peterli R et al (2018) Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: the SM-BOSS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 319:255–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lyon A, Gibson SC, De-loyde K, Martin D (2015) Gastroesophageal reflux in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: hiatal findings and their management influence outcome. Surg Obes Related Dis 11:530–537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Varban OA et al (2019) Surgeon variation in severity of reflux symptoms after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 34:1769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kohn GP et al (2013) Guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia. Surg Endosc 27:4409–4428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Melissas J et al (2015) Gastroesophageal reflux disease and sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 25:2430–2435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mizrahi I et al (2019) Routine upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy before laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: is it necessary? Obes Surg 29:1704–1708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Birkmeyer NJ et al (2005) Partnering with payers to improve surgical quality: the Michigan plan. Surgery 138:815–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Share DA et al (2011) How a regional collaborative of hospitals and physicians in Michigan cut costs and improved the quality of care. Health Aff (Project Hope) 30:636–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Velanovich V (2007) The development of the GERD-HRQL symptom severity instrument. Dis Esophagus 20:130–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Siegal SR, Dolan JP, Hunter JG (2017) Modern diagnosis and treatment of hiatal hernias. Langenbeck's Arch Surg 402:1145–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yates RB, Oelschlager BK (2015) Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Clin N Am 95:527–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Peters JH (2013) SAGES guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia. Surg Endosc 27:4407–4408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dakour Aridi HN, Tamim H, Mailhac A, Safadi BY (2017) Concomitant hiatal hernia repair with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is safe: analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database. Surg Obes Related Dis 13:379–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Samakar K et al (2016) The effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with concomitant hiatal hernia repair on gastroesophageal reflux disease in the morbidly obese. Obes Surg 26:61–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stefanidis D et al (2010) Guidelines for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc 24:2647–2669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Soricelli E et al (2013) Sleeve gastrectomy and crural repair in obese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and/or hiatal hernia. Surg Obes Related Dis 9:356–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne P. Ehlers.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

This study received support from AHRQ 1R01HS023597-01 (Video Analysis for Ensuring Safer Diffusion of New Procedures) and the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative (Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan). Dr. Justin Dimick is a consultant & equity owner at ArborMetrix, Inc, which had no role in the work herein. Dr. Oliver Varban receives salary support from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan for his role as co-director of the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative. Dr. Karan Chhabra is a participant in the IHPI National Clinician Scholars Program. Dr. Anne Ehlers and Dr. Jyothi Thumma have no additional conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ehlers, A.P., Chhabra, K., Thumma, J.R. et al. In the eye of the beholder: surgeon variation in intra-operative perceptions of hiatal hernia and reflux outcomes after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 35, 2537–2542 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07668-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07668-4

Keywords

Navigation