Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A curriculum to democratize and standardize flexible endoscopy fundamental knowledge and skills: a critical review of the first 5 years of a surgical endoscopy university diploma

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

As flexible endoscopy offers many advantages to patients, access to training should be aggressively encouraged. In 2014, the IRCAD-IHU-Strasbourg launched a year-long university diploma using advanced education methods to offer surgeons and gastroenterologists high-quality, personalized training in flexible endoscopy. This paper describes and critically reviews the first 5 years of the University Diploma in Surgical Endoscopy (UDSE).

Methods

The UDSE aims to progressively transmit theoretical knowledge, clinical judgment, and practical skills on basic and advanced flexible endoscopy. The 300-h year-long curriculum is composed of 100 h of online lectures with tests, 150 h of clinical rotations and 50 h of hands-on sessions. The hands-on training is delivered through validated mechanical simulators, virtual reality simulators, and specifically designed ex vivo and in vivo animal models. Participants’ demographics, training, and clinical experience were recorded. Trainees’ evaluations of each online lecture, hands-on training, and clinical rotations were assessed using a Likert scale from 1 (not satisfactory) to 5 (outstanding). Trainees’ skill progression was evaluated using the Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills (GAGES) proficiency test. Finally, clinical uptake was surveyed.

Results

162 (79.01% males) trainees from 38 countries enrolled and successfully completed the first 5 courses. The vast majority of the trainees were surgeons and 19.14% were gastroenterologist. Sixty-nine (42.59%) participants were residents and 97 (56.79%) had no prior experience in flexible endoscopy. The online lectures, on-site sessions, and clinical rotations were highly appreciated receiving an overall average score of 4.33/5, 4.56/5, 4.43/5, respectively. Trainees’ endoscopic skills improved significantly (16.68 vs. 20.53 GAGES scores; p = 0.016). At an average of 18.83 months following the course, 31 alumni (77.50% of repliers) started to use a flexible endoscope in their practice.

Conclusions

Over its 5-year evolution, the UDSE has proven to be a valid means to ease access to the fundamental knowledge, practical skills, and clinical judgment necessary to achieve proficiency in surgical endoscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rodning CB, Zingarelli WJ, Webb WR, Curreri PW (1986) Postgraduate surgical flexible endoscopic education. Ann Surg 203:272–274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tierney J, Baucom RB, Holzman MD, Poulose BK, Pierce RA (2017) Current trends in the practice of endoscopy among surgeons in the USA. Surg Endosc 31:1675–1679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bittner JG, Coverdill JE, Imam T, Deladisma AM, Edwards MA, Mellinger JD (2008) Do increased training requirements in gastrointestinal endoscopy and advanced laparoscopy necessitate a paradigm shift? A survey of program directors in surgery. J Surg Educ 65:418–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Subhas G, Gupta A, Mittal VK (2010) Necessity for improvement in endoscopy training during surgical residency. Am J Surg 199:331–334 discussion 334-335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Delisle M, Chernos C, Park J, Hardy K, Vergis A (2018) Canadian general surgery residents' need formal curricula and objective performance assessments in gastrointestinal endoscopy training: a program director census. Surg Endosc 32:5012–5020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kroh M, Reavis KM (2016) The SAGES manual operating through the endoscope. Springer International Publishing, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Pearl JP, Marks JM (2006) The future of teaching surgical endoscopy. Surg Innov 13:280–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Poulose BK, Dunkin BJ, Marks JM, Sadik R, Sroka G, Anvari M, Thaler K, Adrales GL, Hazey JW, Lightdale JR, Velanovich V, Swanstrom LL, Mellinger JD, Fried GM (2010) How should we establish the clinical case numbers required to achieve proficiency in flexible endoscopy? Am J Surg 199:121–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vassiliou MC, Dunkin BJ, Fried GM, Mellinger JD, Trus T, Kaneva P, Lyons C, Korndorffer JR Jr, Ujiki M, Velanovich V, Kochman ML, Tsuda S, Martinez J, Scott DJ, Korus G, Park A, Marks JM (2014) Fundamentals of endoscopic surgery: creation and validation of the hands-on test. Surg Endosc 28:704–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. American Board of Surgery. Available at https://www.absurgery.org/xfer/abs-fec.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2019

  11. Crespin OM, Okrainec A, Kwong AV, Habaz I, Jimenez MC, Szasz P, Weiss E, Gonzalez CG, Mosko JD, Liu LWC, Swanstrom LL, Perretta S, Shlomovitz E (2018) Feasibility of adapting the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery trainer box to endoscopic skills training tool. Surg Endosc 32:2968–2983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Habaz I, Perretta S, Okrainec A, Crespin OM, Kwong AV, Weiss E, van der Velden E, Guerriero L, Longo F, Mascagni P, Liu LWC, Jackson TD, Swanstrom LL, Shlomovitz E (2019) Adaptation of the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery box for endoscopic simulation: performance evaluation of the first 100 participants. Surg Endosc 33:3444–3450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. van der Wiel SE, Koch AD, Bruno MJ (2018) Face and construct validity of a novel mechanical ERCP simulator. Endosc Int Open 6:E758–E765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Poulose BK, Dunkin BJ, Marks JM, Sadik R, Sroka G, Anvari M, Thaler K, Adrales GL, Hazey JW, Lightdale JR, Velanovich V, Swanstrom LL, Mellinger JD, Fried GM (2010) Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills (GAGES): a valid measurement tool for technical skills in flexible endoscopy. Surg Endosc 24:1834–1841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fonseca AL, Reddy V, Yoo PS, Gusberg RJ, Longo WE (2016) Senior surgical resident confidence in performing flexible endoscopy: what can we do differently? J Surg Educ 73:311–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jones RP, Stylianides NA, Robertson AG, Yip VS, Chadwick G (2015) National survey on endoscopy training in the UK. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 97:386–389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gardner AK, Scott DJ, Willis RE, Van Sickle K, Truitt MS, Uecker J, Brown KM, Marks JM, Dunkin BJ (2017) Is current surgery resident and GI fellow training adequate to pass FES? Surg Endosc 31:352–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mellinger JD, Ponsky JL (1994) Surgical endoscopy fellowships. What difference do they make? Surg Endosc 8:86–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gardner AK, Marks JM, Pauli EM, Majumder A, Dunkin BJ (2017) Changing attitudes and improving skills: demonstrating the value of the SAGES flexible endoscopy course for fellows. Surg Endosc 31:147–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Agnès Gronfier, Lesley Daloz and Gaelle Lechner-Giovannoni for the assistance in collecting data for the present paper and Isabelle Petty for medical English proofreading.

Funding

The study was funded by a grant from the French National Research Association (Grant no. ANR-15-IDFN-0011) to the IHU.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvana Perretta.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Jacques Marescaux is the President of the IRCAD Institute, which is partly funded by Karl Storz and Medtronic. Pietro Mascagni, Pietro Riva, Ludovica Guerriero, Eran Shlomovitz, Bernard Dallemagne, Lee Swanström and Silvana Perretta have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mascagni, P., Riva, P., Guerriero, L. et al. A curriculum to democratize and standardize flexible endoscopy fundamental knowledge and skills: a critical review of the first 5 years of a surgical endoscopy university diploma. Surg Endosc 35, 2473–2479 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07657-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07657-7

Keywords

Navigation