Skip to main content

What influences conversion to open surgery during laparoscopic colorectal resection?

Abstract

Introduction

We analyzed the risk of morbidity and mortality in laparoscopic (Lap) conversion for colorectal surgery across a group of subspecialist surgeons with expertise in minimally invasive techniques.

Methods

We reviewed prospective data patients who underwent abdominopelvic procedures from 7/1/2007 to 12/31/2016 at a tertiary care facility. We identified procedures that were converted from Lap to open (Lap converted). Lap converted procedures were matched to Lap completed and open procedures based on elective versus urgent and surgeon. We also abstracted patient demographics and outcomes at 30 days using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program defined adverse event list. We analyzed outcomes across these groups (Lap converted, Lap completed, open procedures) with x2 and t tests and used the Bonferroni Correction to account for multiple statistical testing.

Results

From a database of 12,454 procedures, we identified 100 Lap converted procedures and matched them to 305 open procedures and 339 Lap completed procedures. In our dataset of abdominopelvic procedures, Lap techniques were attempted in 49 ± 1%. We noted a higher risk of aggerate morbidity following open procedures (33 ± 10) as compared to Lap converted (29 ± 17%) and the matched Lap completed procedures (18 ± 8%; p < 0.001). Converted cases had the longest operative time (222 ± 102 min), compared to lap completed (177 ± 110), and open procedures (183 ± 89). There were no differences in mortality, sepsis complications, anastomotic leaks, or unplanned returns to the operating room across the three operative groups.

Conclusions

Although aggregate morbidity of Lap converted procedures is higher than in Lap completed procedures, it remains less than in matched open procedures. Compared to Lap completed procedures, the additional morbidity of Lap converted procedures appears to be related to additional surgical site infection risk. Our data suggest that surgeons should not necessarily be influenced by additional complications associated with conversion when contemplating complex laparoscopic colorectal procedures

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Simorov A, Shaligram A, Shostrom V et al (2012) Laparoscopic colon resection trends in utilization and rate of conversion to open procedure: a national database review of academic medical centers. Ann Surg 256:462–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Slim K, Pezet D, Riff Y et al (1995) High morbidity rate after converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 82:1406–1408

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Poon J, Law W, Wong I et al (2009) Impact of laparoscopic colorectal resection on surgical site infection. Ann Surg 249(1):77–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Thorpe H, Jayne DG, Guillou PJ et al (2008) Patient factors influencing conversion from laparoscopically assisted to open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 95:199–205

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schlachta C, Mamazza J, Gregoire R (2003) Predicting conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 17:1228–1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamamoto S, Fukunaga M, Miyajima N et al (2009) Impact of conversion on surgical outcomes after laparoscopic operation for rectal carcinoma: a retrospective study of 1,073 patients. J Am Coll Surg 208(3):383–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pikarsky AJ, Saida Y, Yamaguchi T et al (2002) Is obesity a high-risk factor for laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc 16(5):855–858

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vaccaro C, Gustavo R, Guillermo O et al (2014) Laparoscopic colorectal resection: a simple predictor model and a stratification risk for conversion to open surgery. Disease of the Colon and Rectum 57(7):869–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Masoomi H, Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Mills S et al (2015) Risk factors for conversion or laparoscopic surgery to open surgery: does conversion worsen outcome? World J Surg 39:1240–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tekkis P, Senagore A, Delaney C (2005) Conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 19:47–54

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tekkis P, Senagore A, Delaney C et al (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery—comparison of right sided and left sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Agha A, Furst A (2008) Iesalniesk I Conversion rate in 300 laparoscopic rectal resections and its influence on morbidity and oncological outcome. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:409–417

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gorgun E, Benlice C, Abbas M (2016) Conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: are short-term outcomes worse than with open surgery? Tech Coloproctol 20:845–851

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Masoomi H, Mills S et al (2014) Outcomes of conversion of laparoscopic colorectal surgery to open surgery. JSLS. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2014.00230

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kiran R, El-Gazzaz G, Vogel J et al (2010) Laparoscopic approach significantly reduces surgical site infections after colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 211:232–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Moine M, Fabre J, Vacher C et al (2003) Factors and consequences of conversion in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease. Br J Surg 90:323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Franko J, O’Connell B, Mehall J et al (2006) The influences of prior abdominal operations on conversion and complication rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. JSLS 10:169–175

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Curet M (2000) Special problems in laparoscopic surgery: previous abdominal surgery, obesity, and pregnancy. Surg Clin North Am 80(4):1093–1110

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding support.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caitlin Stafford.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Ms Caitlin Stafford, Dr. Todd Francone, Dr. Peter Marcello, Dr. Patricia Roberts, and Dr. Rocco Ricciaridi have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stafford, C., Francone, T., Roberts, P.L. et al. What influences conversion to open surgery during laparoscopic colorectal resection?. Surg Endosc 35, 1584–1590 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07536-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07536-1

Keywords

  • Laparoscopic
  • Colectomy
  • Conversion
  • Open