Skip to main content
Log in

Trends in bariatric surgery in Texas: an analysis of a statewide administrative database 2013–2017

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) tracks 30-day outcomes of bariatric patients, but only at accredited centers. Presently, these cases are not broken down by state. Administrative databases can be used to answer some of the questions that are not asked by clinical databases and also to validate those databases. We proposed using the inpatient and outpatient administrative databases in Texas to examine both the numbers and trends of bariatric surgery in Texas over a 5-year period.

Methods

The Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File (IPUDF) and the Texas Outpatient Public Data File (OPUDF) were examined for the years 2013–2017. We searched for patients undergoing laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG), laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and duodenal switch. Robotic assisted cases were also examined.

Results

There were 105,199 bariatric cases performed in Texas from 2013 to 2017. There were 173 centers performing bariatric surgery. The most common operation performed was the sleeve gastrectomy at 73,663 case (70% of total). Gastric bypasses were second at 22,890 cases. During this time period, LAGB almost disappeared; dropping from 2090 cases in 2013 to 115 cases in 2017, with removal of 2097 LAGB in the study period in the OPUDF. During this time period, there was a lower growth rate of the number of SG in the IPUDF with a large increase in SG performed with outpatient status, while LRYGB remained relatively stable.

Conclusion

Rates of bariatric surgery in Texas are increasing slowly. The dominant procedure is the SG with a trend towards being done under outpatient status. LAGB has been essentially phased out. There is an increase in SG being performed under ‘outpatient’ status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, Wolski K, Brethauer SA, Navaneethan SD, Aminian A, Pothier CE, Kim ES, Nissen SE, Kashyap SR, STAMPEDE Investigators (2014) Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes—3-year outcomes. N Engl J Med 370(21):2002–2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Campos GM, Khoraki J, Browning MG, Pessoa BM, Mazzini GS, Wolfe L (2019) Changes in utilization of bariatric surgery in the United States from 1993 to 2016. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program. https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/mbsaqip/registry-request. Accessed 6 Jan 2019

  4. Estimate of Bariatric surgery numbers, 2011–2017. https://asmbs.org/resources/estimate-of-bariatric-surgery-numbers. Accessed 9 Jan 2019

  5. Spaniolas K, Kasten KR, Brinkley J, Sippey ME, Mozer A, Chapman W, Pories W (2015) The changing bariatric surgery landscape in the USA. Obes Surg 25(8):1544–1546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ponce J, De Maria E, Nguyen N, Hutter M, Sudan R, Morton J (2016) American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimation of bariatric surgery procedures in 2015 and surgeon workforce in the United States. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12(9):1637–1630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nguyen NT, Vu S, Kim E, Bodunova N, Phelan M (2016) Trends in utilization of bariatric surgery, 2009–2012. Surg Endosc 30(7):2723–2727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. English W, DeMaria E, Brethauer S, Mattar S, Rosenthal R, Morton J (2018) American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimation of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States in 2016. Surg Obes Relat Dis 14:259–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nguyen N, Masoomi H, Magno C, Nguyen X, Laugenour K, Lane J (2011) Trends in the use of bariatric surgery, 2003–2008. J Am Coll Surg 213(2):261–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Peters A, Sachs J, Porter J, Love D, Costello A (2014) The value of all-payer claims databases to states. N C Med J 75(3):211–213

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US,tx/PST045217. Accessed Oct 2019

  12. Texas Outpatient Surgical and Radiological Procedure Public Use Data File, 2013–2017 (2019) Texas Department of State Health Services, Center for Health Statistics, Austin, Texas

  13. Texas Hospital Inpatient Discharge Public Use Data File, 2013–2017 (2019) Texas Department of State Health Services, Center for Health Statistics, Austin, Texas

  14. Clapp B, Wicker E, Jones R, Schenk M, Swinney I, Dodoo C, Tyroch A (2019) Where are sleeves performed? An analysis of inpatient versus outpatient databases in a large state. Surg Obes Relat Dis 15(7):1066–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Estimate of bariatric surgery numbers, 2011–2018. https://asmbs.org/resources/estimate-of-bariatric-surgery-numbers. Accessed Feb 2020

  16. Kizy S, Jahansouz C, Downey M, Hevelone N, Ikramuddin S, Leslie D (2017) National trends in bariatric surgery 2012–2015: demographics, procedure selection, readmissions, and cost. Obes Surg 27(11):2933–2939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Varela JE, Nguyen N (2015) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leads the US utilization of bariatric surgery at academic medical centers. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11(5):987–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Surve A, Cottam D, Zaveri H, Cottam A et al (2018) Does the future of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy lie in the outpatient surgery center? A retrospective study of the safety of 3162 outpatient sleeve gastrectomies. Surg Obes Relat Dis 14(10):1442–1447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Billing P, Billing J, Harris E, Kaufman J, Landerholm R, Stewart K (2019) Safety and efficacy of outpatient sleeve gastrectomy: 2534 cases performed in a single free-standing ambulatory surgical center. Surg Obes Relat Dis 15(6):832–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Clapp B, Harper B, Cutshall M, Alvara C, Lee I, Tyroch A (2020) How many sleeve gastrectomies are done at nonaccredited centers in Texas? Surg Obes Relat Dis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2020.01.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Papasavas P, Seip R, Stone A, Staff I, McLaughlin T, Tishler D (2019) Robot-assisted sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results from the metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program data registry. Surg Obes Relat Dis 15(8):1281–1290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Acevedo E, Mazzei M, Zhao H, Lu X, Edwards M (2019) Outcomes in conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted revisional bariatric surgery: a retrospective, case-controlled study of the MBSAQIP database. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06917-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the Texas Tech HSC Office of Faculty Development, especially Eduardo Vazquez and Marco Rodriguez.

Funding

No funding was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Clapp.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Benjamin Clapp, Brittany Harper, William Klingsporn, Evan Liggett, Ashtyn Barrientes, Isaac Lee, Alan Tyroch have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clapp, B., Klingsporn, W., Lee, I. et al. Trends in bariatric surgery in Texas: an analysis of a statewide administrative database 2013–2017. Surg Endosc 35, 1566–1571 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07533-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07533-4

Keywords

Navigation