Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A video guide of five access methods to the splenic flexure: the concept of the splenic flexure box

  • Dynamic Manuscript
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study was to describe all the possible approaches for laparoscopic splenic flexure mobilization (SFM), each suitable for specific situations, and create an illustrated system to show SFM approaches in an easy and practical way to make it easy to learn and teach.

Methods

Two different phases. First part: Cadaver-based study of the colonic splenic flexure anatomy. In order to demonstrate the different approaches, a balloon was placed through the colonic hepatic flexure in the lesser sac without sectioning any of the fixing ligaments of the splenic flexure. Second part: A real case series of laparoscopic SFM.

Results

First part: 11 cadavers were dissected. Five potential approaches to SFM were found: anterior, trans-omentum, lateral, medial infra-mesocolic, and medial trans-mesocolic. The illustrative system developed was named: Splenic Flexure “Box”(SFBox).

Second part: One of the types of SFM described in first part was used in five patients with colorectal cancer. Each laparoscopic approach to the splenic flexure was illustrated in a video accompanied by illustration aids delineating the access.

Conclusion

With the cadaver dissection and subsequent demonstration in real-life laparoscopic surgery, we have shown five types of laparoscopic splenic flexure mobilization. The Splenic Flexure “Box” is a useful way to learn and teach this surgical maneuver.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jamali FR, Soweid AM, Dimassi H, Bailey C, Leroy J, Marescaux J (2008) Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 143:762–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Okuda J, Yamamoto M, Tanaka K, Masubuchi S, Uchiyama K (2016) Laparoscopic resection of transverse colon cancer at splenic flexure: technical aspects and results. Updates Surg 68:71–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Benseler V, Hornung M, Iesalnieks I, von Breitenbuch P, Glockzin G, Schlitt HJ, Agha A (2012) Different approaches for complete mobilization of the splenic flexure during laparoscopic rectal cancer resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:1521–1529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-012-1495-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Culligan K, Coffey JC, Kiran RP, Kalady M, Lavery IC, Remzi FH (2012) The mesocolon: a prospective observational study. Colorectal Dis 14:421–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mike M, Nobuyasu K (2015) Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: a review of the fascial composition of the abdominal cavity. Surg Today 45:129–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Araujo SEA, Seid VE, Kim NJ, Bertoncini AB, Nahas SC, Cecconello I (2012) Assessing the extent of colon lengthening due to splenic flexure mobilization techniques: a cadaver study. Arq Gastroenterol 49:219–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Saber AA, Dervishaj O, Aida SS, Christos PJ, Dakhel M (2016) CT Scan mapping of splenic flexure in relation to spleen and its clinical implications. Am Surg 82:416–419

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vecchio R, Marchese S, Intagliata E (2017) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer: what is the role of complete mesocolic excision and splenic flexure mobilization? Indian J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-017-1631-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Girard E, Trilling B, Rabattu PY, Sage PY, Taton N, Robert Y, Chaffanjon P, Faucheron JL (2019) Level of inferior mesenteric artery ligation in low rectal cancer surgery: high tie preferred over low tie. Tech Coloproctol 23:267–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-01931-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsuda T, Iwasaki T, Hirata K, Tsugawa D, Sugita Y, Sumi Y, Kakeji Y (2015) A three-step method for laparoscopic mobilization of the splenic flexure. Ann Surg Oncol 22(3):S335. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4637-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Watanabe J, Ota M, Suwa Y, Ishibe A, Masui H, Nagahori K (2017) Evaluation of lymph flow patterns in splenic flexural colon cancers using laparoscopic real-time indocyanine green fluorescence imaging. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:201–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim HJ, Kim CH, Lim SW, Huh JW, Kim YJ, Kim HR (2013) An extended medial to lateral approach to mobilize the splenic flexure during laparoscopic low anterior resection. Colorectal Dis 15:e93–e98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Garcia-Granero A, Sánchez-Guillén L, Carreño O, Sancho Muriel J, AlvarezSarrado E, Fletcher-Sanfeliu D, Flor Lorente B et al (2017) Importance of the Moskowitz artery in the laparoscopic medial approach to splenic flexure mobilization: a cadaveric study. Tech Coloproctol 21:567–572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, Papadopoulos T, Merkel S (2009) Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation—technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis 11:354–365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Perrakis A, Weber K, Merkel S, Matzel K, Agaimy A, Gebbert C, Hohenberger W (2014) Lymph node metastasis of carcinomas of transverse colon including flexures. Consideration of the extramesocolic lymph node stations. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:1223–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Isik O, Benlice C, Gorgun E (2017) A novel approach for robotic mobilization of the splenic flexure. Tech Coloproctol 21:53–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Carlson RM, Roberts PL, Hall JF, Marcello PW, Schoetz DJ, Read TE, Ricciardi R (2014) What are 30-day postoperative outcomes following splenic flexure mobilization during anterior resection? Tech Coloproctol 18:257–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This project has not received any financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vicent Primo Romaguera.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Alvaro Garcia-Granero, Vicent Primo Romaguera, Monica Millan, Gianluca Pellino, Delfina Fletcher-Sanfeliu, Matteo Frasson, Blas Flor-Lorente, Noelia Ibañez-Canovas, Omar Carreño Saenz, Luis Sanchez-Guillen, Jorge Sancho Muriel, Eduardo Alvarez Sarrado, Alfonso A. Valverde-Navarro have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 Supplemental data file 1. The different ligaments that need to be dissected and cut to achieve a complete SFM are described. 1) Splenocolic ligament, 2) Phrenicocolic ligament, 3) Gastrocolic ligament, 4) Pancreatocolic ligament (MP4 9708 kb)

Supplementary file2 (MP4 150033 kb)

Supplementary file3 (MP4 249900 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garcia-Granero, A., Primo Romaguera, V., Millan, M. et al. A video guide of five access methods to the splenic flexure: the concept of the splenic flexure box. Surg Endosc 34, 2763–2772 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07423-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07423-9

Keywords

Navigation