Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic major hepatectomy is a technically challenging procedure requiring a steep learning curve. The liver hanging maneuver is a useful technique in liver resection, especially for large or invasive tumors, a relative contraindication of the laparoscopic approach. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy using the liver hanging maneuver and extended indications.
Methods
Patients who underwent laparoscopic major hepatectomy using the liver hanging maneuver by a single surgeon from January 2013 and September 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Our hanging technique involves placing the hanging tape along the inferior vena cava for right-sided hepatectomy or the ligamentum venosum for left-sided hepatectomy.
The upper end of the tape was placed at the lateral side of the major hepatic veins. The learning curve for operating time and blood loss was evaluated using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method.
Results
Among 53 patients, 18 underwent right hepatectomy, 26 underwent left hepatectomy, and 9 underwent right posterior sectionectomy. CUSUM analysis showed that operative time and blood loss improved after the 30th laparoscopic major hepatectomy.
The 53 consecutive patients were divided into two groups (early, patients 1–30; late, patients 31–53). The median operative time was lower in the late group, but the difference was not statistically significant (270 vs. 245 min, p = 0.261). The median blood loss was also significantly lower in the late group (350 vs. 150 ml, p < 0.001).
Large tumors (measuring > 10 cm) and tumors in proximity to major vessels were significantly higher in the late group (0 vs. 17.4%, p = 0.018; 3.3 vs. 21.7%, p = 0.036; respectively).
Conclusion
This study shows that laparoscopic major hepatectomy using the modified liver hanging maneuver has a learning curve of 30 cases. After procedure standardization, the indications have gradually been extended to large or invasive tumors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS, Asbun H, O’Rourke N, Tanabe M, Koffron AJ, Tsung A, Soubrane O, Machado MA, Gayet B, Troisi RI, Pessaux P, Van Dam RM, Scatton O, Abu HM, Belli G, Kwon CH, Edwin B, Choi GH, Aldrighetti LA, Cai X, Cleary S, Chen KH, Schon MR, Sugioka A, Tang CN, Herman P, Pekolj J, Chen XP, Dagher I, Jarnagin W, Yamamoto M, Strong R, Jagannath P, Lo CM, Clavien PA, Kokudo N, Barkun J, Strasberg SM (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261:619–629
Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2804 patients. Ann Surg 250:831–841
Vigano L, Laurent A, Tayar C, Tomatis M, Ponti A, Cherqui D (2009) The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection: improved feasibility and reproducibility. Ann Surg 250:772–782
van der Poel MJ, Besselink MG, Cipriani F, Armstrong T, Takhar AS, van Dieren S, Primrose JN, Pearce NW, Abu Hilal M (2016) Outcome and learning curve in 159 consecutive patients undergoing total laparoscopic hemihepatectomy. JAMA Surg 151:923–928
Nomi T, Fuks D, Kawaguchi Y, Mal F, Nakajima Y, Gayet B (2015) Learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy. Br J Surg 102:796–804
Lee W, Woo JW, Lee JK, Park JH, Kim JY, Kwag SJ, Park T, Jeong SH, Ju YT, Jeong EJ, Lee YJ, Choi SK, Hong SC, Jeong CY (2016) Comparison of learning curves for major and minor laparoscopic liver resection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26:457–464
Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Ni M, Darzi AW, Hanna GB (2010) Systematic review on mentoring and simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 252:943–951
Wilson E, Janssens S, McLindon LA, Hewett DG, Jolly B, Beckmann M (2019) Improved laparoscopic skills in gynaecology trainees following a simulation-training program using take-home box trainers. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 59:110–116
Kim JH, Ryu DH, Jang LC, Choi JW (2016) Lateral approach liver hanging maneuver in laparoscopic anatomical liver resections. Surg Endosc 30:3611–3617
Kim JH, Choi JW (2017) A modified liver hanging maneuver in pure laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy with preservation of the middle hepatic vein: video and technique. J Gastrointest Surg 21:1181–1185
Kim JH (2019) Pure laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy using the Glissonean approach and a modified liver hanging maneuver (video). Gastrointest Surg 23:825–826
Kwon Y, Han HS, Yoon YS, Cho JY (2015) Are large hepatocellular carcinomas still a contraindication for laparoscopic liver resection? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25:98–102
Ai JH, Li JW, Chen J, Bie P, Wang SG, Zheng SG (2013) Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with a tumor size of 5–10 cm. PLoS ONE 8:e72328
Shelat VG, Cipriani F, Basseres T, Armstrong TH, Takhar AS, Pearce NW, AbuHilal M (2015) Pure laparoscopic liver resection for large malignant tumors: does size matter? Ann Surg Oncol 22:1288–1293
Yoon YS, Han HS, Cho JY, Kim JH, Kwon Y (2013) Laparoscopic liver resection for centrally located tumors close to the hilum, major hepatic veins, or inferior vena cava. Surgery 153:502–509
Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H, Otsuka Y, Nitta H, Abe Y, Hasegawa Y, Katagiri T, Takagi C, Itano O, Kaneko H, Wakabayashi G (2014) A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21:745–753
Kawaguchi Y, Fuks D, Kokudo N, Gayet B (2018) Difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: proposal for a new classification. Ann Surg 267:13–17
Hasegawa Y, Nitta H, Takahara T, Katagiri H, Kanno S, Otsuka K, Sasaki A (2018) Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy is suitable as a first step in pure laparoscopic major hepatectomy. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2:376–382
Belli G, Gayet B, Han HS, Wakabayashi G, Kim KH, Cannon R, Kaneko H, Gamblin T, Koffron A, Dagher I, Buell JF (2013) Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy a consideration for acceptance as standard of care. Surg Endosc 27:2721–2726
Kim JH (2018) Pure laparoscopic right hepatectomy using modified liver hanging maneuver: technical evolution from caudal approach toward ventral approach. J Gastrointest Surg 22:1343–1349
Kim JH (2018) Modified liver hanging maneuver focusing on outflow control in pure laparoscopic left-sided hepatectomy. Surg Endosc 32:2094–2100
Araki K, Conrad C, Ogiso S, Kuwano H, Gayet B (2014) Intraoperative ultrasonography of laparoscopic hepatectomy: key technique for safe liver transection. J Am Coll Surg 218:e37–41
Villani V, Bohnen JD, Torabi R, Sabbatino F, Chang DC, Ferrone CR (2016) “Idealized” vs. “True” learning curves: the case of laparoscopic liver resection. HPB (Oxf) 18:504–509
Belghiti J, Guevara OA, Noun R, Saldinger PF, Kianmanesh R (2001) Liver hanging maneuver: a safe approach to right hepatectomy without liver mobilization. J Am Coll Surg 193:109–111
Shindoh J, Hasegawa K, Aoki T, Beck Y, Sugawara Y, Makuuchi M, Kokudo N (2011) Significance of liver hanging maneuvers for invasive liver lesions in no-routine anterior approach policy. J Gastrointest Surg 15:988–995
Liu CL, Fan ST, Cheung ST, Lo CM, Ng IO, Wong J (2006) Anterior approach versus conventional approach right hepatic resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled study. Ann Surg 244:194–203
Kim JH, Cho BS, Jang JH (2018) Pure laparoscopic anatomical segment VI resection using the Glissonean approach, Rouviere’s sulcus as a landmark, and a modified liver hanging maneuver (with video). Langenbecks Arch Surg 403:131–135
Funding
No funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Ji Hoon Kim and Hyeyoung Kim have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, J.H., Kim, H. Modified liver hanging maneuver in laparoscopic major hepatectomy: the learning curve and evolution of indications. Surg Endosc 34, 2742–2748 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07248-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07248-1