Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Association of high ligation versus low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery on anastomotic leak, postoperative complications, and mortality after minimally invasive surgery for distal sigmoid and rectal cancer

  • 2019 SAGES Oral
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In the treatment of distal sigmoid and rectal cancer, the appropriate level for the ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) remains unresolved. High ligation divides the IMA proximally at its origin, and low ligation ligates the IMA distal to the origin of left colic artery. We assessed the association of level of ligation in scheduled minimally invasive resection of sigmoid and rectal cancers on anastomotic leak, postoperative complications, and death within 30 days.

Methods

We identified all patients with primary sigmoid and rectal cancer treated with scheduled minimally invasive resection and primary anastomosis between January 2002 and June 2018 using linked institutional and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databases. We assessed the association of level of ligation with each outcome by fitting individual univariable and multivariable logistic regression models, adjusting for surgical approach, tumor location, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and Charlson comorbidity index.

Results

We included 158 patients treated with high ligation and 123 patients treated with low ligation. Overall, 12 patients had an anastomotic leak requiring intervention within 30 days: 5 in the high ligation group (3.2%, 95% CI 1.4–7.2%) and 7 in the low ligation group (5.7%, 95% CI 2.8–11.3%). There was no association between the level of ligation and anastomotic leak (unadjusted OR 1.85, 95% CI 0.58–6.38; adjusted OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.16–2.55). Similarly, there was no association between the level of ligation and reoperation for anastomotic leak (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.15–10.9), major complications (Clavien-Dindo III–V; OR 2.22, 95% CI 0.90–5.77), minor complications (Clavien-Dindo I–II; OR 1.51, 95% CI 0.88–2.60), and all complications (OR 1.58, 95% CI 0.94–2.67). No deaths occurred in either group.

Conclusions

There was no association of level of ligation of the IMA with anastomotic leak, postoperative complications as a composite, or death. The choice of high or low ligation of the IMA should be made based on technical factors such as length for the creation of a tension-free anastomosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2017) Cancer statistics, 2018 CA: a cancer. J Clin 68:7–30

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lee GH, Malietzis G, Askari A, Bernardo D, Al-Hassi HO, Clark SK (2015) Is right-sided colon cancer different to left-sided colorectal cancer?–a systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol 41:300–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vogel JD, Eskicioglu C, Weiser MR, Feingold DL, Steele SR (2017) The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 60:999–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh D, Luo J, Liu X, Ma Z, Cheng H, Yu Y, Yang L, Zhou Z-G (2017) The long-term survival benefits of high and low ligation of inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer surgery: a review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 96(47):e8520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Matsuda K, Yokoyama S, Hotta T, Takifuji K, Watanabe T, Tamura K, Mitani Y, Iwamoto H, Mizumoto Y, Yamaue H (2017) Oncological outcomes following rectal cancer surgery with high or low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery. Gastrointest Tumors 4:45–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Matsuda K, Hotta T, Takifuji K, Yokoyama S, Oku Y, Watanabe T, Mitani Y, Ieda J, Mizumoto Y, Yamaue H (2015) Randomized clinical trial of defaecatory function after anterior resection for rectal cancer with high versus low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery. Br J Surg 102:501–508

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mari GM, Crippa J, Cocozza E, Berselli M, Livraghi L, Carzaniga P, Valenti F, Roscio F, Ferrari G, Mazzola M (2018) Low ligation of inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer reduces genitourinary dysfunction: results from a randomized controlled trial (HIGHLOW Trial). Ann Surg 269(6):1018–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Park MG, Hur H, Min BS, Lee KY, Kim NK (2012) Colonic ischemia following surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer: a study of 10 cases and a review of the literature. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:671–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dworkin MJ, Allen-Mersh TG (1996) Effect of inferior mesenteric artery ligation on blood flow in the marginal artery-dependent sigmoid colon. J Am Coll Surg 183:357–360

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sciuto A, Merola G, De Palma GD, Sodo M, Pirozzi F, Bracale UM, Bracale U (2018) Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Gastroenterol 24:2247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Raval MV, Pawlik TM (2018) practical guide to surgical data sets: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) and Pediatric NSQIP. JAMA Surg 153:764–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Benchimol EI, Smeeth L, Guttmann A, Harron K, Moher D, Petersen I, Sorensen HT, von Elm E, Langan SM (2015) The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement. PLoS Med 12:e1001885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Charlson M, Pompei P, Ales K, MacKenzie C (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, Fushimi K, Graham P, Hider P, Januel J-M, Sundararajan V (2011) Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol 173:676–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kulu Y, Ulrich A, Bruckner T, Contin P, Welsch T, Rahbari NN, Buchler MW, Weitz J (2013) Validation of the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer definition and severity grading of anastomotic leakage. Surgery 153:753–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W et al (2010) Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 147:339–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Edwardes M (1994) Confidence intervals for a binomial proportion by S. E. Vollset, Statistics in Medicine, 12, 809-824 (1993). Stat Med 13:1693–1698

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Greenland S, Pearl J, Robins JM (1999) Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology 10:37–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lederer DJ, Bell SC, Branson RD et al (2019) Control of confounding and reporting of results in causal inference studies. guidance for authors from editors of respiratory, sleep, and critical care journals. Ann Am Thorac Soc 16:22–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Suttorp MM, Siegerink B, Jager KJ, Zoccali C, Dekker FW (2015) Graphical presentation of confounding in directed acyclic graphs. Nephrol Dial Transplant 30:1418–1423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. RStudio Team (2016) RStudio: integrated development for R. http://www.rstudio.com/. Accessed 21 Mar 2018

  24. Walker KG, Bell SW, Rickard MJFX, Mehanna D, Dent OF, Chapuis PH, Bokey EL (2004) Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 240:255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fujita S, Teramoto T, Watanabe M, Kodaira S, Kitajima M (1993) Anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery: a risk factor for recurrence and poor prognosis. Jpn J Clin Oncol 23:299–302

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang Y, Wang G, He J, Zhang J, Xi J, Wang F (2018) High tie versus low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg 52:20–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lange MM, Buunen M, van de Velde CJH, Lange JF (2008) Level of arterial ligation in rectal cancer surgery: low tie preferred over high tie. A review. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1139–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zedan A (2016) High or low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery during curative surgery for rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 42:S141

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rutegård M, Hemmingsson O, Matthiessen P, Rutegård J (2012) High tie in anterior resection for rectal cancer confers no increased risk of anastomotic leakage. Br J Surg 99:127–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yasuda K, Kawai K, Ishihara S et al (2016) Level of arterial ligation in sigmoid colon and rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg Oncol 14:99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zeng J, Su G (2018) High ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery during sigmoid colon and rectal cancer surgery increases the risk of anastomotic leakage: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 16:157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Singh PP, Zeng ISL, Srinivasa S, Lemanu DP, Connolly AB, Hill AG (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of use of serum C-reactive protein levels to predict anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 101:339–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Fujii S, Ishibe A, Ota M, Watanabe K, Watanabe J, Kunisaki C, Endo I (2018) Randomized clinical trial of high versus low inferior mesenteric artery ligation during anterior resection for rectal cancer. BJS Open 2:195–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fayez A. Quereshy.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Arman Draginov, Tyler R. Chesney, Humzah A. Quereshy, Sami A. Chadi, and Fayez A. Quereshy have no conflicts of interest or financial disclosures.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Draginov, A., Chesney, T.R., Quereshy, H.A. et al. Association of high ligation versus low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery on anastomotic leak, postoperative complications, and mortality after minimally invasive surgery for distal sigmoid and rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 34, 4593–4600 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07203-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07203-0

Keywords

Navigation