Abstract
Background and aims
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was developed as a feasible and reliable treatment for gastrointestinal mucosal or submucosal lesions. Bacteremia may occur after ESD. Currently, the use of prophylactic antibiotics after gastric ESD is controversial. This study was designed to explore the value of prophylactic antibiotics in the treatment of gastric mucosal and submucosal lesions after ESD.
Methods
In this prospective study, in total, 103 patients who underwent gastric ESD were included, and the frequency of bacteremia and changes in inflammation-related indicators before and after the procedure were investigated. The patients did not receive prophylactic antibiotics.
Results
The body temperature (T), white blood cell count (WBC), and procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels did not significantly differ between the perforation group (N = 40) and nonperforation group before gastric ESD (N = 63) (all P > 0.05). The T, WBC, and CRP levels (all P < 0.05) in the patients with perforation were significantly higher than those in the patients without perforation 24 h after gastric ESD. The incidence of bacteremia did not significantly differ between the two groups (all P > 0.05). In total, 6 of 309 blood cultures were cultured with bacteria. The total frequency of bacteremia in the perforation and nonperforation groups was 2.5% and 3.2%, respectively. No sepsis occurred in any patients.
Conclusion
Regardless of whether perforation occurred after gastric ESD, the incidence of bacteremia was transient and low. Therefore, based on our single-center study in China, prophylactic antibiotics may not be necessary in patients with intraoperative perforation during gastric ESD.
Trial registration
A single-center prospective study at chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR1800019668).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Association J G C (2017) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer 20(1):1–19
Ono H, Yao K, Fujishiro M et al (2016) Guidelines for endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer. Dig Endosc 28(1):3–15
Yamashita K, Shiwaku H, Ohmiya T et al (2016) Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection under general anesthesia. World J Gastrointest Endosc 8(13):466–471
Chun HJ, Keum B, Kim JH et al (2011) Current status of endoscopic submucosal dissection for the management of early gastric cancer: a Korean perspective. World J Gastroenterol 17(21):2592–2596
Chiu PW, Teoh AY, Wong SK et al (2012) Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) compared with gastrectomy for treatment of early gastric neoplasia: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 26(12):3584–3591
Saito I, Tsuji Y, Sakaguchi Y et al (2014) Complications related to gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection and their managements. Clin Endosc 47(5):398–403
Watari J, Tomita T, Toyoshima F et al (2013) Clinical outcomes and risk factors for perforation in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective pilot study. World J Gastrointest Endosc 5(6):281–287
Hirota WK, Petersen K, Baron TH et al (2003) Guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 58(4):475–482
Rey JR, Axon A, Budzynska A et al (1998) Guidelines of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (E.S.G.E.) antibiotic prophylaxis for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Eur Soc Gastrointest Endosc 30(3):318–324
Rahman N, Rogers S, Ryan D et al (2008) Infective endocarditis prophylaxis and the current AHA, BSAC, NICE and Australian guidelines. J Ir Dent Assoc 54(6):264–270
Nelson DB, Sanderson SJ, Azar MM (1998) Bacteremia with esophageal dilation. Gastrointest Endosc 48(6):563–567
Fernandez-Esparrach G, Calderon A, De-La-Pena J et al (2014) Endoscopic submucosal dissection. Sociedad Espanola de Endoscopia Digestiva (SEED) clinical guideline. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 106(2):120–132
Hoteya S, Yamashita S, Kikuchi D et al (2011) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for submucosal invasive gastric cancer and curability criteria. Dig Endosc 23(1):30–36
Itaba S, Iboshi Y, Nakamura K et al (2011) Low-frequency of bacteremia after endoscopic submucosal dissection of the stomach. Dig Endosc 23(1):69–72
Kato M, Kaise M, Obata T et al (2012) Bacteremia and endotoxemia after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasia: pilot study. Gastric Cancer 15(1):15–20
Lee TH, Hsueh PR, Yeh WC et al (2000) Low frequency of bacteremia after endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc 52(2):223–225
Janssen J, Konig K, Knop-Hammad V et al (2004) Frequency of bacteremia after linear EUS of the upper GI tract with and without FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 59(3):339–344
Li G, Zeng S, Chen Y et al (2015) Bacteremia after endoscopic submucosal excavation for treating the gastric muscular layer tumors. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015:306938
Wu Q, Yang H, Kang Y (2018) Comparison of diagnostic accuracy among procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and interleukin 6 for blood culture positivity in general ICU patients. Crit Care 22(1):339
Nijman RG, Moll HA, Smit FJ et al (2014) C-reactive protein, procalcitonin and the lab-score for detecting serious bacterial infections in febrile children at the emergency department: a prospective observational study. Pediatr Infect Dis J 33(11):e273–e279
Qin C, Zhang H, Gu J et al (2016) Dynamic monitoring of platelet activation and its role in post-dissection inflammation in a canine model of acute type A aortic dissection. J Cardiothorac Surg 11(1):86
Le VB, Schneider JG, Boergeling Y et al (2015) Platelet activation and aggregation promote lung inflammation and influenza virus pathogenesis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 191(7):804–819
Weinstein MP, Mirrett S, Van Pelt L et al (1998) Clinical importance of identifying coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from blood cultures: evaluation of MicroScan Rapid and dried overnight Gram-positive panels versus a conventional reference method. J Clin Microbiol 36(7):2089–2092
Weinstein MP (2003) Blood culture contamination: persisting problems and partial progress. J Clin Microbiol 41(6):2275–2278
Kawata N, Tanaka M, Kakushima N et al (2016) The low incidence of bacteremia after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) obviates the need for prophylactic antibiotics in esophageal ESD. Surg Endosc 30(11):5084–5090
Acknowledgements
The authors are indebted to the staff of the Digestive Endoscope Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University for their assistance in the implementation of this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Drs Yang Liu, Youxiang Chen, Xu Shu, Yin Zhu, Guohua Li, Junbo Hong, Conghua Song and Yue Guan, and Xiaojiang Zhou have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, Y., Chen, Y., Shu, X. et al. Prophylactic antibiotics may be unnecessary in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection due to the low incidence of bacteremia. Surg Endosc 34, 3788–3794 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07143-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07143-9