Skip to main content
Log in

Prevalence of anatomic landmarks for orientation during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

We sought to determine the prevalence of common anatomic landmarks around the gallbladder that may be useful in orienting surgeons during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods

The subhepatic anatomy of 128 patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy was recorded. We searched and recorded the presence of five anatomic landmarks: the bile duct (B), the Sulcus of Rouviere (S), the left hepatic artery (A), the umbilical fissure (F), and the duodenum (E). These are the previously described B-SAFE landmarks.

Results

We found that the duodenum and umbilical fissure were present reliably in almost all patients. The position of the left hepatic artery could be reliably determined by its pulsation in 84% of patients. A portion of the bile duct could be seen in 77% and the Sulcus of Rouviere was present in 80%. Furthermore, the hepatobiliary triangle was always found superior or at the same level as the Sulcus of Rouviere.

Conclusions

We found that these five anatomic landmarks were reliably present. This suggest that using the B-SAFE landmarks may allow a surgeon to more easily orient before and during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and prevent bile duct injuries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Strasberg SM, Hertz M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180:101–125

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Morgenstern L, Wong L, Berci G, Twelve hundred open cholecystectomies before the laparoscopic era (1992) A standard for comparison. Arch Surg 127:400–403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. The Southern Surgeons Club (1991) A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med 324:1073–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vollmer CM Jr, Caller MP (2007) Biliary injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: why still a problem? Gastroenterology 133:1039–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Strasberg SM, Brunt LM (2010) Rationale and use of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 211:132–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hugh TB (2002) New strategies to prevent laparoscopic bile duct injury-surgeons can learn from pilots. Surgery 132:826–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hugh TB, Kelly MD, Mekisic A (1997) Rouviere; s sulcus: a useful landmark in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84:1253–1254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hunter JG (1991) Avoidance of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 162:71–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Diamond T, Mole DJ (2005) Anatomical orientation and cross-checking- the key to safer laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 92:663–664

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sutherland F, Ball C (2015) The Heuristics and psychology of bile duct injuries. In: Dixon E, Vollmer CMJ, May GR (eds) Management of benign biliary stenosis and injury. Springer, New York, pp 191–204

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Patkin M (2008) Surgical heuristics. ANZ J Surg 78:1065–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Madani A, Watanabe Y, Feldman L, Vassiliou M, Barkun J, Fried GM, Aggarwal R (2015) Expert Intraoperative judgment and decision-making: defining the cognitive competencies for safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 221:931–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Saxon JC, Perry W, Nathanson L, Hugh TB, Hugh TJ (2014) Using a standardized method for laparoscopic cholecystectomy to create a concept operation-specific checklist. HPB 16:422–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stewart L (2015) Perceptual errors leading to bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In: Dixon E, Vollmer CMJ, May GR (eds) Management of benign biliary stenosis and injury. Springer, New York, pp 165–186

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Singh M, Prasad N (2017) The anatomy of Rouviere’s sulcus as seen during cholecystectomy: a proposed classification. J Minim Access Surg 13:89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Neychev V, Saldinger PF (2011) Raising the thinker: new concept for dissecting the cystic pedicle during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 146:1441–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sutherland F, Dixon E (2017) The importance of cognitive map placement in bile duct injuries. Can J Surg 60:424–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francis Sutherland.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

Dr. J Schendel has no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. Dr. C Ball has no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. Dr. E Dixon has no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose, Dr. F Sutherland has no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schendel, J., Ball, C., Dixon, E. et al. Prevalence of anatomic landmarks for orientation during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surg Endosc 34, 3508–3512 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07131-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07131-z

Keywords

Navigation