Skip to main content
Log in

Can we better predict readmission for dehydration following creation of a diverting loop ileostomy: development and validation of a prediction model and web-based risk calculator

  • 2019 SAGES Oral
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Dehydration is the most common morbidity following creation of a diverting loop ileostomy (DLI). We aimed to develop and validate a prediction model and web-based risk calculator for readmission for dehydration following DLI creation.

Methods

After institutional review board approval, we retrospectively reviewed the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database between 2012 and 2017. Adult patients (> 18 years) who underwent DLI with a resection for colorectal cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, or diverticulitis were identified. Patient demographics, operative and postoperative data were collected. The final prediction model, developed in 60% of the cohort (training set) and which modeled the 30-day cumulative incidence of readmission for dehydration, was selected using highest area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) criterion. Model calibration was assessed with the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. The model was then assessed in validation and test sets, using 20% of the cohort for each.

Results

Of 25,638 patients in the ACS-NSQIP database who met inclusion criteria, 15,222 patients were randomly selected for the training set. The incidence of readmission for dehydration in this cohort was 2.1%. The final model with the highest AUC retained 12 candidate variables: age, sex, smoking status, diabetes, hypertension, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, type of admission, underlying diagnosis, procedure performed, operative time, index admission length of stay, and major morbidity. The model demonstrated good discrimination (AUC 0.76, 95% CI 0.74–0.79) and the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test confirmed good calibration (p = 0.50). Five-thousand and seventy-three patients were available for the validation and test sets, respectively, and the model remained strong in both the validation and test sets (AUCs of 0.73 and 0.73, respectively). The prediction model was then converted into a web-based risk calculator.

Conclusions

A prediction model and web-based risk calculator for readmission for dehydration after DLI creation was developed and validated, demonstrating good predictive capabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Garlipp B, Ptok H, Schmidt U, Meyer F, Gastinger I, Lippert H (2010) Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal carcinoma: effects on anastomotic leak rate and postoperative bladder dysfunction after non-emergency sphincter-preserving anterior rectal resection. Results of the quality assurance in rectal cancer surgery multicenter observational trial. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395:1031–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Luglio G, Pendlimari R, Holubar SD, Cima RR, Nelson H (2011) Loop ileostomy reversal after colon and rectal surgery: a single institutional 5-year experience in 944 patients. Arch Surg 146:1191–1196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chadi SA, Fingerhut A, Berho M, DeMeester SR, Fleshman JW, Hyman NH, Margolin DA, Martz JE, McLemore EC, Molena D, Newman MI, Rafferty JF, Safar B, Senagore AJ, Zmora O, Wexner SD (2016) Emerging trends in the etiology, prevention, and treatment of gastrointestinal anastomotic leakage. J Gastrointest Surg 20:2035–2051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Huser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M, Schuster T, Rosenberg R, Kleeff J, Friess H (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 248:52–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li W, Stocchi L, Cherla D, Liu G, Agostinelli A, Delaney CP, Steele S, Gorgun E (2017) Factors associated with hospital readmission following diverting ileostomy creation. Tech Coloproctol 21:641–648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bakx R, Busch OR, Bemelman WA, Veldink GJ, Slors JF, van Lanschot JJ (2004) Morbidity of temporary loop ileostomies. Dig Surg 21:277–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Messaris E, Sehgal R, Deiling S, Koltun W, Stewart D, McKenna K, Poritz LS (2012) Dehydration is the most common indication for readmission after diverting ileostomy creation. Dis Colon Rectum 55:175–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fish DR, Mancuso CR, Garcia-Aguilar JE, Lee SW, Nash GM, Sonoda T, Charlson ME, Temple LK (2017) Readmission after ileostomy creation: retrospective review of a common and significant event. Ann Surg 265:379–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Phatak UR, Kao LS, You YN, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, Feig BW, Nguyen S, Cantor SB, Change GJ (2014) Impact of ileostomy-related complications on the multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21:507–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li L, Lau KS, Ramanathan V, Orcutt ST, Sansgiry S, Albo D, Berger DH, Anaya DA (2017) Ileostomy creation in colorectal cancer surgery: risk of acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease. J Surg Res 210:204–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Paquette I, Solan P, Rafferty JF, Ferguson MA, Davis BR (2013) Readmission for dehydration or renal failure after ileostomy creation. Dis Colon Rectum 56:974–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheung WY, Neville BA, Earle C (2009) Etiology of delays in the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and their impact on outcomes for stage II and III rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1054–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG (2015) Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. J Clin Epidemiol 68:134–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shiloach M, Frencher SK Jr, Steeger JE, Rowell KS, Bartzokis K, Tomeh MG, Richards KE, Ko CY, Hall BL (2010) Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 210:6–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Justiniano CF, Temple LK, Swanger AA, Xu Z, Speranza JR, Cellini C, Salloum RM, Fleming FJ (2018) Readmissions with dehydration after ileostomy creation: rethinking risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum 61:1297–1305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gessler B, Haglind E, Angenete E (2014) A temporary loop ileostomy affects renal function. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:1131–1135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The elements of statistical learning. Model assessment and selection. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Gonella F, Valenti A, Massucco P, Russolillo N, Mineccia M, Fontana AP, Cucco D, Ferrero A (2019) A novel patient-centered protocol to reduce hospital readmissions for dehydration after ileostomy. Surgery 1:8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-019-00643-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nagle D, Pare T, Keenan E, Marcet K, Tizio S, Poylin V (2012) Ileostomy pathway virtually eliminates readmission for dehydration in new ostomates. Dis Colon Rectum 55:1266–1272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Grahn SW, Lowry AC, Osborne MC, Melton GB, Gaertner WB, Vogler SA, Madoff RD, Kwaan MR (2019) System-wide implementation for transitions after ileostomy surgery: can intensive monitoring of protocol compliance decrease readmissions? A randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 63:363–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen SY, Stem M, Cerullo M, Canner JK, Gearhart SL, Safar B, Fang SH, Efron JE (2018) Predicting the risk of readmission from dehydration after ileostomy formation: the dehydration readmission after ileostomy prediction score. Dis Colon Rectum 61:1410–1417

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Collins GS, de Groot JA, Dutton S, Omar O, Shanyinde M, Tajar A, Voysey M, Wharton R, Yu LM, Moons KG, Altman DG (2014) External validation of multvariable prediction models: a systematic review of methodological conduct and reporting. BMC Med Res Methodol 14:40

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Sarah Sabboobeh, Marie Demian, and Georgia Rigas for their administrative support and assistance.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marylise Boutros.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Alqahtani, Garfinkle, Zhao, Vasilevsky, Morin, Ghitulescu, Faria and Boutros have no conflicts of interest or financial disclosures to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alqahtani, M., Garfinkle, R., Zhao, K. et al. Can we better predict readmission for dehydration following creation of a diverting loop ileostomy: development and validation of a prediction model and web-based risk calculator. Surg Endosc 34, 3118–3125 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07069-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07069-2

Keywords

Navigation