Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for superficial esophageal neoplastic lesions: a meta-analysis

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

The emerging endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD) is becoming an alternative method for superficial esophageal neoplastic lesions. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of ESTD for superficial esophageal neoplastic lesions.

Methods

A comprehensive literature review was conducted to search relevant studies through PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science before 1 December 2018. Studies relating to ESTD for superficial esophageal neoplastic lesions were included. Rates of effectiveness (en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, and curative resection rate), rates of feasibility (muscular damage rate, perforation rate, postprocedural bleeding rate, and emphysema rate), and rates of follow-up (recurrence rate and stricture rate) were pooled and analyzed. Forest plots were constructed based on the random-effects model. Sensitivity analyses were also performed if significant heterogeneity existed.

Results

Six studies including 414 patients and 436 superficial esophageal neoplastic lesions that underwent ESTD were available for analysis. The pooled estimates of en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, and curative resection rate were 98% (95% CI 95.8–99.0%), 87.0% (95% CI 78.2–92.5%), and 87.6% (95% CI 67.4–96.0%), respectively. The pooled outcomes of muscular damage rate, perforation rate, postprocedural bleeding rate and emphysema rate were 19.1% (95% CI 9.8–33.8%), 2.2% (95% CI 1.1–4.1%), 1.6% (95% CI 0.7–3.5%), and 12.2% (95% CI 4.3–29.9%), respectively. Finally, the pooled results of recurrence and stricture were 4.7% (0.9–20.5%) and 20.9% (11.3–35.2%), respectively.

Conclusions

ESTD appears to be an effective and feasible approach for treating superficial esophageal neoplastic lesions. However, future research is needed for new and comprehensive methods to decrease the stricture rate after ESTD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Inoue H, Minami H, Kaga M, Sato Y, Kudo SE (2010) Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal dysplasia and carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 20(25–34):v–vi

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhai YQ, Li HK, Linghu EQ (2016) Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for large superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasms. World J Gastroenterol 22:435–445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Linghu E, Feng X, Wang X, Meng J, Du H, Wang H (2013) Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for large esophageal neoplastic lesions. Endoscopy 45:60–62

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arantes V, Albuquerque W, Freitas Dias CA, Demas Alvares Cabral MM, Yamamoto H (2013) Standardized endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for management of early esophageal tumors (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 78:946–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pioche M, Mais L, Guillaud O, Hervieu V, Saurin JC, Ponchon T, Lepilliez V (2013) Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for large esophageal neoplastic lesions. Endoscopy 45:1032–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle–Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25:603–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 327:557–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang W, Zhai Y, Chai N, Linghu E, Li H, Feng X (2018) Single- and double-tunnel endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for large superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasms. Endoscopy 50:505–510

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang JL, Gan T, Zhu LL, Wang YP, Yang L, Wu JC (2017) Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection: a feasible solution for large superficial rectal neoplastic lesions. Dis Colon Rectum 60:866–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang X, Shi D, Yu Z, Li R, Chen W, Bai F, Wu X, Cheng C, Shi R, Liu P (2018) A multicenter retrospective study of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for large lesser gastric curvature superficial neoplasms. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6471-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gan T, Yang JL, Zhu LL, Wang YP, Yang L, Wu JC (2016) Endoscopic submucosal multi-tunnel dissection for circumferential superficial esophageal neoplastic lesions (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 84:143–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ye LP, Zheng HH, Mao XL, Zhang Y, Zhou XB, Zhu LH (2016) Complete circular endoscopic resection using submucosal tunnel technique combined with esophageal stent placement for circumferential superficial esophageal lesions. Surg Endosc 30:1078–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang R, Cai H, Zhao X, Lu X, Liu M, Lv W, Liu Z, Wu K, Han Y (2017) Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 86:831–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang J, Zhu XN, Zhu LL, Chen W, Ma YH, Gan T, Yang JL (2018) Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and precancerous lesions. World J Gastroenterol 24:2878–2885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang W, Zhai Y, Chai N, Linghu E, Lu Z, Li H, Feng X (2018) Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for large superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasm: efficacy and safety study to guide future practice. Surg Endosc 32:2814–2821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang AY (2013) Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection: the space between. Gastrointest Endosc 78:953–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ma MX, Bourke MJ (2018) Endoscopic submucosal dissection in the West: current status and future directions. Dig Endosc Off J Jpn Gastroenterol Endosc Soc 30:310–320

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Dr. Bin Ma for his selfless teaching and help for Dr. Peiwen Li to conduct this study.

Funding

This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (Grant No. 2015020561), The Fund for Scientific Research of The First Hospital of China Medical University (Grant No. fsfh1514), and Wu Jieping Medical Foundation Grant No. 320.6750.18293).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenya Li.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Peiwen Li, Dr. Bin Ma, Dr. Shulei Gong, Dr. Xinyu Zhang, and Dr. Wenya Li have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, P., Ma, B., Gong, S. et al. Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for superficial esophageal neoplastic lesions: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 34, 1214–1223 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06875-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06875-y

Keywords

Navigation