Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic balloon dilation in inflammatory bowel disease: results of the large multicenter study of the ENEIDA registry

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 18 June 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

There is no information regarding the outcome of Crohn’s disease (CD) patients treated with endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) in non-referral hospitals, nor on the efficacy of EBD in ulcerative colitis (UC). We report herein the results of the largest series published to date.

Aim

To assess the efficacy and safety of EBD for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) stenosis performed in 19 hospitals with different levels of complexity and to determine factors related to therapeutic success.

Methods

We identified IBD patients undergoing EBD in the ENEIDA database. Efficacy of EBD was compared between CD and UC and between secondary and tertiary hospitals. Predictive factors of therapeutic success were assessed with multivariate analysis.

Results

Four-hundred dilations (41.2% anastomotic) were performed in 187 IBD patients (13 UC/Indeterminate colitis). Technical and therapeutic success per dilation was achieved in 79.5% and 55.3%, respectively. Therapeutic success per patient was achieved in 78.1% of cases (median follow-up: 40 months) with 49.7% requiring more than one dilation. No differences related to either diagnosis or hospital complexity was found. Technical success [OR 4.12 (95%CI 2.4–7.1)] and not receiving anti-TNF at the time of dilation [OR 1.7 (95% CI 1.1–2.6)] were independently related to therapeutic success per dilation. A stricture length ≤ 2 cm [HR 2.43 (95% CI 1.11–5.31)] was a predictive factor of long-term success per patient. The rate of major complications was 1.3%.

Conclusions

EBD can be performed with similar efficacy and safety in hospitals with differing levels of complexity and it might be a suitable treatment for UC with short stenosis. To achieve a technical success and the short length of the stenosis seem to be critical for long-term therapeutic success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 18 June 2019

    Javier P. Gisbert was listed incorrectly as Javier Pérez-Gisbert.

Abbreviations

ASGE:

The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

CD:

Crohn’s disease

COMBO:

Combined treatment (immunosuppressant plus biological treatment)

EBD:

Endoscopic balloon dilation

ENEIDA:

Estudio Nacional en Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal sobre Determinantes genéticos y Ambientales (Spanish Study of Genetic and Environmental Determinants in Inflammatory Bowel Disease)

GETECCU:

Grupo Español de Trabajo en Enfermedad de Crohn y Colitis Ulcerosa (The Spanish Working Group in Crohn’s Disease and Colitis)

IBD:

Inflammatory bowel disease

IC:

Indeterminate colitis

IFX:

Infliximab

IMM:

Immunosuppressant’s alone

IPAA:

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

TNF:

Tumour Necrosis Factor

UC:

Ulcerative colitis

References

  1. Reimund JM, Wittersheim C, Dumont S, Muller CD, Kenney JS, Baumann R et al (1996) Increased production of tumour necrosis factor-alpha interleukin-1 beta, and interleukin-6 by morphologically normal intestinal biopsies from patients with Crohn’s disease. Gut 39(5):684–689

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McKaig BC, Hughes K, Tighe PJ, Mahida YR (2002) Differential expression of TGF-beta isoforms by normal and inflammatory bowel disease intestinal myofibroblasts. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 282(1):C172–C182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rieder F, Lawrance IC, Leite A, Sans M (2011) Predictors of fibrostenotic Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 17(9):2000–2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pucilowska JB, Williams KL, Lund PK (2010) Fibrogenesis IV. Fibrosis and inflammatory bowel disease: cellular mediators and animal models. Am J Physiol 279(4):653–659

    Google Scholar 

  5. Szabò H, Fiorino G, Spinelli A, Rovida S, Repici A, Malesci AC et al (2010) Review article: anti-fibrotic agents for the treatment of Crohn’s disease—lessons learnt from other diseases. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 31(2):189–201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cosnes J, Gower-Rousseau C, Seksik P, Cortot A, Gower-Rousseau C, Seksik P et al (2011) Epidemiology and natural history of inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology 140(6):1785–1794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Solberg IC, Vatn MH, Høie O, Stray N, Sauar J, Jahnsen J et al (2007) Clinical course in Crohn’s disease: results of a Norwegian population-based ten-year follow-up study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:1430–1438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Peyrin-Biroulet L, Loftus EV, Colombel J-F, Sandborn WJ (2010) The natural history of adult Crohn’s disease in population-based cohorts. Am J Gastroenterol 105(2):289–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rutgeerts P, Geboes K, Vantrappen G, Beyls J, Kerremans R, Hiele M (1990) Predictability of the postoperative course of Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 99:956–963

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wibmer AG, Kroesen AJ, Gröne J, Buhr H-J, Ritz J-P (2010) Comparison of strictureplasty and endoscopic balloon dilatation for stricturing Crohn’s disease–review of the literature. Int J Colorectal Dis 25(10):1149–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hassan C, Zullo A, DeFrancesco V, Ierardi E, Giustini M, Pitidis A et al (2007) Systematic review: endoscopic dilatation in Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 26:1457–1464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Thienpont C, D’Hoore A, Vermeire S, Demedts I, Bisschops R, Coremans G et al (2010) Long-term outcome of endoscopic dilatation in patients with Crohn’s disease is not affected by disease activity or medical therapy. Gut 59(3):320–324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gustavsson A, Magnuson A, Blomberg B, Andersson M, Halfvarson J, Tysk C (2012) Endoscopic dilation is an efficacious and safe treatment of intestinal strictures in Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 36(2):151–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bhalme M, Sarkar S, Lal S, Bodger K, Baker R, Willert RP (2014) Endoscopic balloon dilatation of Crohn’s disease strictures: results from a large United kingdom series. Inflamm Bowel Dis 20(2):265–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Morar PS, Faiz O, Warusavitarne J, Brown S, Cohen R, Hind D et al (2015) Systematic review with meta-analysis: endoscopic balloon dilatation for Crohn’s disease strictures. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 42(10):1137–1148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Navaneethan U, Lourdusamy V, Njei B, Shen B (2016) Endoscopic balloon dilation in the management of strictures in Crohn???s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized trials. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 30(12):5434–5443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Atreja A, Aggarwal A, Dwivedi S, Rieder F, Lopez R, Lashner BA et al (2014) Safety and efficacy of endoscopic dilation for primary and anastomotic Crohn’s disease strictures. J Crohn’s Colitis. 8(5):392–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, Baron TH, Hutter MM, Jacobson BC et al (2010) A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop Gastrointest Endosc. Am Soc Gastrointest Endosc 71(3):446–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Silverberg MS, Satsangi J, Ahmad T, Arnott IDR, Bernstein CN, Brant SR et al (2005) Toward an integrated clinical, molecular and serological classification of inflammatory bowel disease: report of a Working Party of the 2005 Montreal World Congress of Gastroenterology. Can J Gastroenterol 19(Suppl A):5A–36A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dear KLE, Hunter JO (2001) Colonoscopic hydrostatic balloon dilatation of Crohn’ s strictures. J Clin Gastroenterol 33(4):315–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Blomberg B, Rolny P, Järnerot G (1991) Endoscopic treatment of anastomotic strictures in Crohn’s disease. Endoscopy. 23(4):195–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ferlitsch A, Reinisch W, Püpök A, Dejaco C, Schillinger M, Schöfl R et al (2006) Safety and efficacy of endoscopic balloon dilation for treatment of Crohn’s disease strictures. Endoscopy 38(5):483–487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Thomas-Gibson S, Brooker JC, Hayward CMM, Shah SG, Williams CB, Saunders BP (2003) Colonoscopic balloon dilation of Crohn’s strictures: a review of long-term outcomes. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 15(5):485–488

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaplan GG, McCarthy EP, Ayanian JZ, Korzenik J, Hodin R, Sands BE (2008) Impact of hospital volume on postoperative morbidity and mortality following a colectomy for ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 134(3):680–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Feldman M, Friedman LS, Brandt LJ (2016) Sleisenger and Fordtran’s gastrointestinal and liver disease, vol 2, 10th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 2616

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sonnenberg A, Genta RM (2015) Epithelial Dysplasia and Cancer in IBD Strictures. J Crohns Colitis. 9(9):769–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fumery M, Pineton de Chambrun G, Stefanescu C, Buisson A, Bressenot A, Beaugerie L, Amiot A, Altwegg R, Savoye G, Abitbol V, Bouguen G, Simon M, Duffas JP, Hébuterne X, Nancey S, Roblin X, Leteurtre E, Bommelaer G, Lefevre JH, Brunetti F, Guillon F, Bouhn P-BL (2015) Detection of dysplasia or cancer in 3.5% patients with inflammatory bowel disease and colonic strictures. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 13(10):1770–1775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Khan F, Shen B (2019) Inflammation and neoplasia of the pouch in inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 21(4):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bemelman WA, Warusavitarne J, Sampietro GM, Serclova Z, Zmora O, Luglio G et al (2018) ECCO-ESCP consensus on surgery for Crohn’s disease. J Crohn’s Colitis 12(1):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  30. East JE, Brooker JC, Rutter MD, Saunders BP (2007) A pilot study of intrastricture steroid versus placebo injection after balloon dilatation of crohn’s strictures. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5(9):1065–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Loras C, Pérez-Roldan F, Gornals JB, Barrio J, Igea F, González-Huix F et al (2012) Endoscopic treatment with self-expanding metal stents for Crohn’s disease strictures. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 36(9):833–839

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

On the behalf of the ENEIDA registry of GETECCU (in addition to the authors): Julià Panés, MD PhD (Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona), Míguel Mínguez, MD PhD (Hospital Clínico de Valencia, Valencia), Valle García Sánchez, MD PhD (Hospital Reina Sofía, Córdoba), Javier Pérez-Gisbert, MD PhD (Hospital La Princesa, Madrid), Fernando Gomollón, MD PhD (Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza), Marta Piqueras, MD (Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Barcelona), José Luís Cabriada, MD PhD (Hospital de Galdakao, Bizkaia), Montserrat Andreu, MD PhD (Hospital del Mar, Barcelona).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

CL: design of the study, study coordination, acquisition of data, statistical analysis and interpretation of data, manuscript writing, critical revision of the manuscript, and approval of the final draft submitted. XA: study coordination, acquisition of data, statistical analysis and interpretation of data, manuscript writing, critical revision of the manuscript, and approval of the final draft submitted. ME: design of the study, study coordination, critical revision of the manuscript, and approval of the final draft submitted. FFB, YZ: statistical analysis and interpretation of data, critical revision of the manuscript, and approval of the final draft submitted. BG, MS, VS, MB, ED, MC, ER, BS, XC, JB, JG, EI, JPG, MJC, YB, DM, ALS, IR, LB, MA, LM, MDM: acquisition of data, approval of the final draft submitted.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carme Loras.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Xavier Andújar, Carme Loras, Begoña González, Milena Socarras, Vicente, Maia Boscà, Eugeni Domenech, Margalida Calafat, Esther Rodríguez, Beatriz Sicilia, Xavier Calvet, Jesús Barrio, Jordi Guardiola, Eva Iglesias, María José Casanova, Yolanda Ber, David Monfort, Antonio López-Sanromán, Iago Rodríguez, Luís Bujanda, Lucía Márquez, María Dolores Martín-Arranz, Yamile Zabana, Fernando Fernández-Bañares and María Esteve have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The members of the ENEIDA registry of GETECCU are listed in the “Acknowledgement” section.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Andújar, X., Loras, C., González, B. et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic balloon dilation in inflammatory bowel disease: results of the large multicenter study of the ENEIDA registry. Surg Endosc 34, 1112–1122 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06858-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06858-z

Keywords

Navigation