Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Similar hematologic and nutritional outcomes after proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction in comparison to total gastrectomy for early upper gastric cancer

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Proximal gastrectomy offers theoretical benefits over total gastrectomy in terms of hematologic and nutritional outcomes. However, little evidence confirming these benefits has been reported. The aim of this study was to assess the hematologic and nutritional outcomes of proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction in comparison to those of total gastrectomy.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data from 80 patients with stage I gastric cancer who underwent proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (n = 38) or total gastrectomy (n = 42) from September 2014 to December 2015. We compared hematologic (including hemoglobin, ferritin, vitamin B12, etc.) and nutritional outcomes [including body mass index (BMI), serum total protein, albumin, total cholesterol, and total lymphocyte count] between the two groups.

Results

We found no significant differences in changes in hemoglobin (P = 0.250) or cumulative incidence of iron deficiency anemia (P = 0.971) during a median follow-up period of 24 months (range 18–30 months) after surgery. Cumulative incidence of vitamin B12 deficiency also did not differ significantly between the proximal and total gastrectomy groups (P = 0.087). BMI changes from baseline were not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.591). Likewise, there were no statistically significant differences in nutritional outcomes.

Conclusions

Proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction exhibited similar outcomes in terms of hematologic and nutritional features in comparison to total gastrectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Botterweck AA, Schouten LJ, Volovics A, Dorant E, van Den Brandt PA (2000) Trends in incidence of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastric cardia in ten European countries. Int J Epidemiol 29(4):645–654

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Devesa SS, Blot WJ, Fraumeni JF Jr (1998) Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States. Cancer 83(10):2049–2053

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Information Committee of Korean Gastric Cancer A (2016) Korean Gastric cancer association nationwide survey on gastric cancer in 2014. J Gastric Cancer 16(3):131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hiki N, Nunobe S, Kubota T, Jiang X (2013) Function-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 20(8):2683–2692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nomura E, Okajima K (2016) Function-preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer in Japan. World J Gastroenterol 22(26):5888–5895

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sano T, Hollowood A (2006) Early gastric cancer: diagnosis and less invasive treatments. Scand J Surg 95(4):249–255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Takiguchi N, Takahashi M, Ikeda M, Inagawa S, Ueda S, Nobuoka T, Ota M, Iwasaki Y, Uchida N, Kodera Y, Nakada K (2015) Long-term quality-of-life comparison of total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy by postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale (PGSAS-45): a nationwide multi-institutional study. Gastric Cancer 18(2):407–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hu Y, Kim HI, Hyung WJ, Song KJ, Lee JH, Kim YM, Noh SH (2013) Vitamin B(12) deficiency after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an analysis of clinical patterns and risk factors. Ann Surg 258(6):970–975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee JH, Hyung WJ, Kim HI, Kim YM, Son T, Okumura N, Hu Y, Kim CB, Noh SH (2013) Method of reconstruction governs iron metabolism after gastrectomy for patients with gastric cancer. Ann Surg 258(6):964–969

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim DJ, Kim W (2016) Laparoscopy-assisted Proximal gastrectomy with double tract anastomosis is beneficial for vitamin B12 and iron absorption. Anticancer Res 36(9):4753–4758

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ohashi M, Morita S, Fukagawa T, Oda I, Kushima R, Katai H (2015) Functional advantages of proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition over total gastrectomy with roux-en-y esophagojejunostomy for early gastric cancer. World J Surg 39(11):2726–2733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Masuzawa T, Takiguchi S, Hirao M, Imamura H, Kimura Y, Fujita J, Miyashiro I, Tamura S, Hiratsuka M, Kobayashi K, Fujiwara Y, Mori M, Doki Y (2014) Comparison of perioperative and long-term outcomes of total and proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective study. World J Surg 38(5):1100–1106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nozaki I, Hato S, Kobatake T, Ohta K, Kubo Y, Kurita A (2013) Long-term outcome after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for gastric cancer compared with total gastrectomy. World J Surg 37(3):558–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hosoda K, Yamashita K, Katada N, Moriya H, Mieno H, Shibata T, Sakuramoto S, Kikuchi S, Watanabe M (2016) Potential benefits of laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with esophagogastrostomy for cT1 upper-third gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 30(8):3426–3436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wen L, Chen XZ, Wu B, Chen XL, Wang L, Yang K, Zhang B, Chen ZX, Chen JP, Zhou ZG, Li CM, Hu JK (2012) Total vs. proximal gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatogastroenterology 59(114):633–640

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pu YW, Gong W, Wu YY, Chen Q, He TF, Xing CG (2013) Proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy for proximal gastric carcinoma. A meta-analysis on postoperative complications, 5-year survival, and recurrence rate. Saudi Med J 34(12):1223–1228

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Aikou T, Natsugoe S, Shimazu H, Nishi M (1988) Antrum preserving double tract method for reconstruction following proximal gastrectomy. Jpn J Surg 18(1):114–115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ahn SH, Jung DH, Son SY, Lee CM, Park DJ, Kim HH (2014) Laparoscopic double-tract proximal gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 17(3):562–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nomura E, Lee SW, Kawai M, Yamazaki M, Nabeshima K, Nakamura K, Uchiyama K (2014) Functional outcomes by reconstruction technique following laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: double tract versus jejunal interposition. World J Surg Oncol 12

  20. Nomura E, Lee SW, Tokuhara T, Kawai M, Uchiyama K (2012) Functional outcomes according to the size of the gastric remnant and type of reconstruction following open and laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 59(118):1677–1681

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hyung WJ, Lim JS, Song J, Choi SH, Noh SH (2008) Laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph node dissection during total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Am Coll Surg 207(2):e6–e11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Marano A, Hyung WJ (2012) Robotic gastrectomy: the current state of the art. J Gastric Cancer 12(2):63–72

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang K, Bang HJ, Almadani ME, Dy-Abalajon DM, Kim YN, Roh KH, Lim SH, Son T, Kim HI, Noh SH, Hyung WJ (2016) Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction by intracorporeal anastomosis with linear staplers. J Am Coll Surg 222(5):e39–e45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. American Society of Anesthesiologists (2014) ASA physical status classification system, Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Edge SB, American Joint Committee on Cancer (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lauren P (1965) The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma. an attempt at a histo-clinical classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 64:31–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Organization WH (1968) Nutritional anaemias. Report of a WHO scientific group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 405:5–37

    Google Scholar 

  28. Weiss G, Goodnough LT (2005) Anemia of chronic disease. N Engl J Med 352(10):1011–1023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cook JD (2005) Diagnosis and management of iron-deficiency anaemia. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 18(2):319–332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Son MW, Kim YJ, Jeong GA, Cho GS, Lee MS (2014) Long-term outcomes of proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer. J Gastric Cancer 14(4):246–251

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhao P, Xiao SM, Tang LC, Ding Z, Zhou X, Chen XD (2014) Proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition and TGRY anastomosis for proximal gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 20(25):8268–8273

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kosuga T, Ichikawa D, Komatsu S, Okamoto K, Konishi H, Shiozaki A, Fujiwara H, Otsuji E (2015) Feasibility and nutritional benefits of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the upper stomach. Ann Surg Oncol 22(Suppl 3):S929–S935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hayami M, Hiki N, Nunobe S, Mine S, Ohashi M, Kumagai K, Ida S, Watanabe M, Sano T, Yamaguchi T (2017) Clinical outcomes and evaluation of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-flap technique for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Ann Surg Oncol 24(6):1635–1642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jung DH, Lee Y, Kim DW, Park YS, Ahn SH, Park DJ, Kim HH (2017) Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction is superior to laparoscopic total gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 31(10):3961–3969

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Woodward ER (1987) The history of vagotomy. Am J Surg 153(1):9–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Skikne BS, Lynch SR, Cook JD (1981) Role of gastric acid in food iron absorption. Gastroenterology 81(6):1068–1071

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Choi E, Roland JT, Barlow BJ, O’Neal R, Rich AE, Nam KT, Shi C, Goldenring JR (2014) Cell lineage distribution atlas of the human stomach reveals heterogeneous gland populations in the gastric antrum. Gut 63(11):1711–1720

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Adams JF, Glen AI, Kennedy EH, Mackenzie IL, Morrow JM, Anderson JR, Gray KG, Middleton DG (1964) The histological and secretory changes in the stomach in patients with autoimmunity to gastric parietal cells. Lancet 1(7330):401–403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Burclaff J, Osaki LH, Liu D, Goldenring JR, Mills JC (2017) Targeted apoptosis of parietal cells is insufficient to induce metaplasia in stomach. Gastroenterology 152(4):762–766.e767

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kumagai K, Shimizu K, Yokoyama N, Aida S, Arima S, Aikou T (2012) Questionnaire survey regarding the current status and controversial issues concerning reconstruction after gastrectomy in Japan. Surg Today 42(5):411–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Park DJ (2016) Comparison of Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02892643?term=KLASS&cntry=KR&rank=7

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea

    Minah Cho, Taeil Son, Hyoung-Il Kim, Sung Hoon Noh, Seohee Choi, Won Jun Seo, Chul Kyu Roh & Woo Jin Hyung

  2. Gastric Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, South Korea

    Taeil Son, Hyoung-Il Kim, Sung Hoon Noh & Woo Jin Hyung

  3. Robot and Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, South Korea

    Taeil Son, Hyoung-Il Kim & Woo Jin Hyung

Authors
  1. Minah Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Taeil Son
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hyoung-Il Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sung Hoon Noh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Seohee Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Won Jun Seo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Chul Kyu Roh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Woo Jin Hyung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Woo Jin Hyung.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Minah Cho, Taeil Son, Hyoung-Il Kim, Sung Hoon Noh, Seohee Choi, Won Jun Seo, Chul Kyu Roh, and Woo Jin Hyung have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cho, M., Son, T., Kim, HI. et al. Similar hematologic and nutritional outcomes after proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction in comparison to total gastrectomy for early upper gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 33, 1757–1768 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6448-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6448-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation