Skip to main content
Log in

Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy and endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with superficial esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been performed in a high proportion of patients with superficial esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. Endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy (EAM) is a more straightforward technique that is easier to perform. We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of EAM and ESD to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of each procedure.

Methods

A total of 374 patients (423 lesions) who underwent endoscopic resection were retrospectively studied. The following variables were evaluated (1) procedure time and adverse events as safety, and (2) en bloc complete resection rate, local recurrence rate, lymph node recurrence rate, overall survival rate, and cause-specific survival rate as efficacy.

Results

EAM was performed in 134 patients (149 lesions), and ESD was performed in 240 patients (274 lesions). The procedure times of EAM and ESD were 31.0 ± 22.4 and 85.7 ± 46.5 min (p < 0.001), respectively. The perforation rates were 0 and 6.2% (p = 0.002), respectively. The en bloc complete resection rates were 48.3 and 91.6% (p < 0.001), respectively. The local recurrence rates were 5.5 and 0% (p < 0.001), respectively. For lesions measuring less than 15 mm in diameter, EAM had a relatively good en bloc complete resection rate (EAM, 76.1% vs. ESD, 100%) and a significantly short procedure time (EAM, 25.2 ± 15.2 min vs. ESD, 62.7 ± 35.2 min; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

ESD has a higher en bloc complete resection rate and a better local control rate than EAM. For lesions measuring less than 15 mm in diameter, EAM may be a treatment option.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Makuuchi H (2001) Endoscopic mucosal resection for mucosal cancer in the esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 11:445–458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Inoue H, Endo M (1990) Endoscopic esophageal mucosal resection using a transparent tube. Surg Endosc 4:198–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tanabe S, Koizumi W, Mitomi H, Kitamura T, Tahara K, Ichikawa J, Higuchi K, Sasaki T, Nakayama N, Kida M, Saigenji K (2004) Usefulness of EMR with an oblique aspiration mucosectomy device compared with strip biopsy in patients with superficial esophageal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 59:558–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yamashita T, Zeniya A, Ishii H, Tsuji T, Tsuda S, Nakane K, Komatsu M (2011) Endoscopic mucosal resection using a cap-fitted panendoscope and endoscopic submucosal dissection as optimal endoscopic procedures for superficial esophageal carcinoma. Surg Endosc 25:2541–2546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tanabe S, Koizumi W, Higuchi K, Sasaki T, Nakatani K, Hanaoka N, Ae T, Ishido K, Mitomi H, Saigenji K (2008) Clinical outcomes of endoscopic oblique aspiration mucosectomy for surperficial esophageal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 67:814–820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Higuchi K, Tanabe S, Azuma M, Katada C, Sasaki T, Ishido K, Naruke A, Katada N, Koizumi W (2013) A phase II study of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplasms (KDOG 0901). Gastrointest Endosc 78:704–710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ishihara R, Iishi H, Uedo N, Takeuchi Y, Yamamoto S, Yamada T, Masuda E, Higashino K, Kato M, Narahara H, Tatsuta M (2008) Comparison of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for en bloc resection of early esophageal cancers in Japan. Gastrointest Endosc 68:1066–1072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Inoue H, Endo M, Takeshita K, Kawano T, Goseki N, Takiguchi T, Yoshino K (1991) Endoscopic resection of early-stage esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 5:59–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang YM, Boerwinkel DF, Qin X, He S, Xue L, Weusten BL, Dawsey SM, Fleischer DE, Dou LZ, Liu Y, Lu N, Bergman JJ, Wang GQ (2016) A randomized trial comparing multiband mucosectomy and cap-assisted endoscopic resection for endoscopic piecemeal resection of early squamous neoplasia of the esophagus. Endoscopy 48:330–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Oyama T, Tomori A, Hotta K, Morita S, Kominato K, Tanaka M, Miyata Y (2005) Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early esophageal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:S67–S70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ishihara R, Iishi H, Takeuchi Y, Kato M, Yamamoto S, Yamamoto S, Masuda E, Tatsumi K, Higashino K, Uedo N, Tatsuta M (2008) Local recurrence of large squamous-cell carcinoma of the esophagus after endoscopic resection. Gastrointest Endosc 67:799–804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Urabe Y, Hiyama T, Tanaka S, Yoshihara M, Arihiro K, Chayama K (2011) Advantages of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic oblique aspiration mucosectomy for superficial esophageal tumors. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 26:275–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Guo HM, Zhang XQ, Chen M, Huang SL, Zou XP (2014) Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 20:5540–5547

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kakushima N, Kodashima S, Muraki Y, Ono S, Yamamichi N, Tateishi A, Shimizu Y, Oka M, Ogura K, Kawabe T, Ichinose M, Omata M (2006) Endoscopic submucosal dissection of esophageal squamous cell neoplasms. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:688–694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Oka S, Tanaka S, Kaneko I, Mouri R, Hirata M, Kawamura T, Yoshihara M, Chayama K (2006) Advantage of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with EMR for early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 64:877–883

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Takahashi H, Arimura Y, Masao H, Okahara S, Tanuma T, Kodaira J, Kagaya H, Shimizu Y, Hokari K, Tsukagoshi H, Shinomura Y, Fujita M (2010) Endoscopic submucosal dissection is superior to conventional endoscopic resection as a curative treatment for early squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 72:255–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Katada C, Muto M, Tanabe S, Higuchi K, Sasaki T, Azuma M, Ishido K, Masaki T, Nakayama M, Okamoto M, Koizumi W (2013) Surveillance after endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Dig Endosc 25:39–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Japan Esophageal Society (2017) Japanese classification of esophageal cancer, 11th edition. Esophagus 14:37–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang W, Ma Z (2015) Steroid administration is effective to prevent strictures after endoscopic esophageal submucosal dissection: a network meta-analysis. Medicine 94:e1664

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Mizutani T, Tanaka M, Eba J, Mizusawa J, Fukuda H, Hanaoka N, Takeuchi M, Aoyama I, Kojima T, Takizawa K, Ono H, Muto M (2015) A Phase III study of oral steroid administration versus local steroid injection therapy for the prevention of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection (JCOG1217, Steroid EESD P3). Jpn J Clin Oncol 45:1087–1090

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sato H, Inoue H, Kobayashi Y, Maselli R, Santi EG, Hayee B, Igarashi K, Yoshida A, Ikeda H, Onimaru M, Aoyagi Y, Kudo SE (2013) Control of severe strictures after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal carcinoma: oral steroid therapy with balloon dilation or balloon dilation alone. Gastrointest Endosc 78:250–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Katada C, Muto M, Momma K, Arima M, Tajiri H, Kanamaru C, Ooyanagi H, Endo H, Michida T, Hasuike N, Oda I, Fujii T, Saito D (2007) Clinical outcome after endoscopic mucosal resection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma invading the muscularis mucosae-a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Endoscopy 39:779–783

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Akutsu Y, Uesato M, Shuto K, Kono T, Hoshino I, Horibe D, Sazuka T, Takeshita N, Maruyama T, Isozaki Y, Akanuma N, Matsubara H (2013) The overall prevalence of metastasis in T1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of 295 patients. Ann Surg 257:1032–1038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chikatoshi Katada.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Yasuaki Furue, Chikatoshi Katada, Satoshi Tanabe, Kenji Ishido, Yuki Kondo, Yo Kubota, Natuko Kawanishi, Sakiko Yamane, Akinori Watanabe, Hiromitsu Moriya, Keishi Yamashita, Takuya Wada, Takafumi Yano, Mizutomo Azuma, and Wasaburo Koizumi have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Furue, Y., Katada, C., Tanabe, S. et al. Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy and endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with superficial esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. Surg Endosc 33, 1433–1440 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6418-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6418-3

Keywords

Navigation